Ýêîíîìè÷åñêèå íàóêè/13.Ðåãèîíàëüíàÿ ýêîíîìèêà.
Nassakayeva B.E., ñandidate
of economical sciences
Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsouz Republic of Kazakhstan
ECOLOGICAL
ASPECT OF A SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: REGIONAL LEVEL
Summary
One of aspects of a sustainable development is ecological. In article
the current ecological state of the Karaganda region which has negative impact
on an ecological situation of all Central Kazakhstan is considered. Sustainable
regional development requires the solution of environmental issues.
Here already tens
years in the world there are discussions about optimum model of eco-economic
development, concepts of eco-development, ecological safety, a sustainable
development are discussed. The broad movement for a sustainable development of
mankind arose in many respects thanks to the mathematical analysis by J. Forrester, D. and D. Medouzami and
other researchers of tendencies of the growing society within system and
dynamic approach. The matters were discussed in Bogdanov A. and Bukharin N.
works in the twenties of the XX century within, so called, theories of balance:
"Progress of society is development of its productive forces, economic
basis, a superstructure, and also direct and their return connections,
interferences - objectively is defined by intensity of interaction between
society and the nature". This theory of balance laid the foundation of
formation of the general theory of systems of L. Bertalaffi. Connection of the
system engineering, last with algorithms, allowed J. Forester to develop model
of development of society in global scales.
According to the
decision of the United Nations General Assembly the International commission on
environment and development (ICED) which was urged to open the problems uniting
ecological and social and economic aspects of world development was created. In
the report of ICED called "Our General Future" was published definition
"sustainable development". It is used in scientific literature as
"sustainable development". By definition of ICED "the
sustainable development” represents process of large-scale changes in which
intensity of operation of natural and resource potential, the directions of use
of financial means, orientation of scientific and technical development and
institutional changes have to be coordinated with present and future
requirements that assumes existence of political will, legislative activity and
mutually beneficial international cooperation" [1].
According to it,
within the concept of a sustainable development, there are 3 independent
directions:
1. the economic -
improvement of quality of life, the consumed goods and services and
other;
2. the ecological
- preservation of the life-supporting environment (ecosystems) and a resource
basis for satisfaction of economic and social requirements;
3. the social -
welfare improvement, expansion of access of educational and medical services,
and also providing the minimum standards of safety, including and ecological.
Therefore, that
long-term development has to ensure at the same time social stability,
ecological safety and economic efficiency is fundamental. Thus each country has
own idea of a sustainable development, the concepts and programs of the state
development are created. In 2006 in Kazakhstan the Concept of transition to a
sustainable development for 2007-2024 with a long-term outlook, the
quantitative purposes and indicators of measurement of the reached results was
accepted. The concept sets a task of achievement of balance between the
economic, social and ecological targets without causing damage of
competitiveness of economy at the international level. The main functional
directions of transition to a sustainable development are: solution of global
environmental problems (fight against desertification, preservation of
biological diversity, climate change and preservation of an ozone layer of
Earth), use of new ecologically safe technologies, radiation and chemical
safety and waste management, ensuring access to drinking water and solution of
cross-border environmental problems [2].
The Karaganda
region is the large industrial region with rich resource base. Primary activity
of the industrial enterprises of area is development of mineral deposits,
negatively influencing all elements of the biosphere. The strongest technogenic
influence appears on the atmosphere, the general emissions from stationary and
mobile sources make over one million tons per year. In this regard the main
ecological indicators of a sustainable development, such as emissions of the
polluting substances (table 1), dumpings and production wastes were considered.
Table
1 - Emissions of the harmful substances in the atmosphere departing from the
stationary pollution sources (RK/region/region’s cities)
|
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
|
All in Kazakhstan thous. tones |
2 643,1 |
2 320,0 |
2 226,5 |
2 346,2 |
2 384,3 |
|
strong substances |
688,7 |
639,1 |
639,3 |
631,0 |
593,8 |
|
gaseous and liquid substances |
1
954,4 |
1
680,9 |
1
587,2 |
1715,2 |
1790,5 |
|
Karaganda area |
991,6 |
687,7 |
661,2 |
691,3 |
641,4 |
|
Karaganda |
46,3 |
43,0 |
47,7 |
49,1 |
51,1 |
|
Balkhash |
424,3 |
134,9 |
107,3 |
116,7 |
99,9 |
|
Zhezkazgan |
96,9 |
79,0 |
80,8 |
80,5 |
75,8 |
|
Temirtau |
294,5 |
309,2 |
296,0 |
309,1 |
271,0 |
|
Note - It is
made on the basis of a source [3] |
|||||
Temirtau and
Balkhash, the making 57,8% (respectively 42,2% and 15,6%) of all emissions on
area have the most polluted atmosphere. From the enterprises of area the
greatest volumes of emissions have JSC Arcelormittal Temirtau,
"Zhezkazgantsvetmet". In total emissions from these enterprises
determines an ecological situation not only by area, but also by the Central
Kazakhstan.
The production
activity practically of all industrial enterprises has negative impact on land
resources. In RK the area of the broken lands made 245 thousand hectares from
whom 49 thousand hectares, on area the area of the broken lands - 43101
hectares, are worked the broken lands - 9360 hectares. For our area quite
considerable capital investments and the current costs of conservation, but of
recultivation of lands are characteristic there are 3,9% of all sum (table 2). Therefore
the level of remediation works lags behind qualifying standards that influences
ecological intensity of area [4].
Table
2 - The current costs of environmental protection in 2012
(RK/the
Karaganda region)
|
|
All |
Protection of air and
problems of climate changing |
Sewage treatment |
Manage with waste |
protection and rehabilitation
of the soil, underground and surface water |
reservation of a
biodiversity and habitat |
|
Republic of Kazakhstan |
196458926,7 |
58841143,4 |
55938336,7 |
42276896,4 |
24243902,7 |
1254731,6 |
|
Karaganda region |
27016554,6 |
11865347,5 |
8852647,2 |
5098242,2 |
1043859,1 |
3994,5 |
|
Note - It is
made on the basis of a source [3] |
||||||
Influence of
activity of the industrial enterprises on a condition of land resources is
diverse in forms of the manifestation, there is a reduction of fertile lands,
considerable changes of structure and structure of a blanket of crust.
Not less problems
developed in the field of protection and rational use of water resources. The
qualitative composition of the dumped sewage is diverse, on many ingredients
there is an excess of standards of maximum-permissible concentration,
maximum-permissible dumpings. Impurity is connected, generally by that at many
enterprises high-quality sewage treatment isn't provided, there is a pollution of
underground waters from stores of municipal, industrial and agricultural
facilities, important value has secondary pollution of water sources. Data on a
sanitary condition of drinking water (table 3) testify to ecological wellbeing.
Table 3 - Quality of
drinking water in the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2013
unit weight
of water tests nonqualifying to standarts%
|
|
Quality of drinking water of
objects of the decentralized water supply |
Quality of drinking water of
objects of the centralized water supply |
||
|
chemical indica-tors |
microbiological indicators |
chemical indicators |
microbiological indicators |
|
|
Republic of Kazakhstan |
2,5 |
1,56 |
0,67 |
0,66 |
|
Note - It is
made on the basis of a source [3] |
||||
These
tables testify that on chemical and microbiological indicators water meets
standard, on area the corresponding indicators are lower than national average
values. About access for the population to clear water data aren't analyzed,
but it is possible to tell that across Kazakhstan and in the region access is
reduced in connection with reduction of reserves of fresh water. This factor is
a brake to advance of regional system to a sustainable development. In the
Report of the World commission on environmental protection and development
"Our general future" is allocated with key area of a sustainable
development the environmental problem connected with deterioration of natural
base. Here the problem of access for the population to clear water is high on
the list.
Negatively
the waste which is formed in the course of a production activity of the
enterprises and activity of the population (table 4) influences environment.
Table 4 - Formation of waste
|
Waste |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
|
Volume of the dangerous |
453373,1 |
227555,0 |
303116,6 |
420668,3 |
355952,5 |
|
waste, from them |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use |
4840 |
330 |
1960 |
4500 |
9472 |
|
dangerous wastes on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
enterprises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neutralization |
61 |
52 |
63 |
61 |
82 |
|
dangerous wastes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
household |
|
|
|
|
|
|
waste |
3411,9 |
3928,3 |
3784,7 |
3919,3 |
3588,3 |
|
Total amount the formed waste |
456785,0 |
2314833,3 |
306901,3 |
424587,6 |
359540,7 |
|
Volume of the formed waste counting on GDP,
kg/tenge |
0,028 |
0,014 |
0,014 |
0,015 |
0,012 |
|
Note - It is
made on the basis of a source [3] |
|||||
Generally
stores of waste of our area are presented by pedigree dumps of the coal and
mining industry, tailings dams of concentrating factories, dumps of slags of
nonferrous and ferrous metallurgy, of the enterprises of power system. At the
present stage extent of use and recycling is very small, their absolutely small
part is used in production. Though in the Karaganda region favorable
prerequisites for development of ecobusiness in use of waste of local
productions are created. Some waste is valuable raw materials (in some cases
multicomponent) for receiving other final and intermediate products in this
connection their public usefulness can change.
Weaklysustainable
development of ecology is explained by that the area takes the II place in the
republic on emissions, formation of waste is also great. High anthropogenous
loadings in area are connected with prevalence of outdated, inefficient
processing equipment therefore there are enormous losses of raw materials not
only in the course of production, but also at a production stage. In a subsoil
there is not less than a third of the extracted coal, a large amount of iron ore,
losses of associated gas are great, the mountain weight taken from a subsoil is
used approximately for 10%. It must be kept in mind that export goods of area
are, generally raw materials and semi-finished products demand on which often
fluctuates in the world markets that demands development of processing
industries of economy.
The
current ecological state of area, intensive use of not renewable mineral raw
material resources and their not complex use call into
question an inalienable right of all future generations to have the same
opportunities for access to resources what existed at the previous
generations.Though the fundamental principle of a sustainable development is
the balance between current and future state of mankind with preservation of
vital resources of the nature for descendants. Therefore, long-term prospects
of development of the Karaganda region are connected with the solution of
environmental issues.
LIST OF LITERATURE
1.
Agenda of 21 centuries. The report
of a conference of the OUN on environment to development - Rio de Janeiro, on
June 3-4, 1992
2.
The concept of transition of RK to a
sustainable development on 2007-2024
3.
Statistical collection
"Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development of Kazakhstan
2008-2012" - Agency of RK, Astana, 2013
4.
Strategy of territorial development
of the Karaganda region to 2015yeara. Karaganda, 2007