SOCIAL COMPETENCE AS THE KEY COMPETENCE OF A STUDENT

According to the conclusions of home and foreign experts, content and technologies of teaching in modern educational establishment not to a full degree «take into account the change of procedural educational paradigm into result-aimed and competency-based» [1] and not enough oriented onto development of students’ social competence.

Taking into account aforesaid, it is necessary to correct modern educational process in lyceum and to create conditions for development of social competence of its students.

In the process of research it is found out that home and European scientists and practices distinguish different groups of key competencies, that are «interdisciplinary, supersubject, multicomponent» (G. Levitas, О. Pometun, О. Ovcharuk) and «link together personal and social in education, represent a complex mastering the aggregate of activity methods» (N. Bibik) [2] and must provide graduating student of secondary education establishment with successful vital functions and professional productivity, namely: competence in the spheres of activity – educational-cognitive, motivational, civilly-public, social-labour, domestic, cultural; competence, related to the profession; political and social competence, related to life of man in multicultural society, to oral and writing communication, informatization of society.

Ideas, models and basic thoughts of competence approach, methods of its implementation into secondary education practice, theoretical comprehension of different approaches to analysis and understanding of essence of competence as to the didactics category of competency based education is reflected in works of the modern Ukrainian and foreign scientists: I. Bekh, N. Bibik, V. Bondar, I. Zimniaya, М. Yevtukh, L. Kalinina, V. Krayevskiy, G. Callahan, V. Ledniov, О. Lyashenko, N. Nichkalo, B. Oscarsson, М. Sadker, О. Savchenko, О. Sukhomlinska, О. Pometun, О. Topuzov, G. Halazh, N. Khomskiy, A. Khutorskoy, V. Hutmacher, S. Shishov, S. Shoh and others.

Philosophical fundamentals of individual social competence in the context of socialization, social development, social experience mastering, social subject-subject co-operation and interaction were investigated by E. Adler, L. Buyeva, E. Erikson, C. Kelly, A. Leont’yev, T. Parsons, C. Rogers, N. Smelser, and others. Sociological and psychological approaches to solution of problem of lyceum student social competence forming and development are represented in the works of G. Asmolov, A. Brushlinskiy, J. P. Dupuy, I. Zyazyun, L. Petrovs’ka, Ph. Perrenoud, S. Selevko, L. Sokhan’, H. Haste and others.

Modern scientists give a social competence that inherent characteristic signs of social context, in the structure of key competencies of a person, and examine in three foreshortening: as a common collapsible concept that testifies to the level of person’s socialization, as a key competence of a person and as personal integrative property of individual.

Study and analysis of scientistific works show that social competence has different types: social-psychological, sociocultural, social-professional, social-labour, social-lingustic, social-communicative. Some scientists identify social competence according to its essence with existential and civil – representing a forming sphere, providing realization of social and socially-public activity; and they are just in aspect reflected in philosophy, social philosophy, sociology, pedagogics, linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguodidactics in the context of our research subject. Thus, grounding on the analysis of essence and concepts of the social competence types we can understand them sustatially and structurally interconnected. Considering them to be the «cells of the coordinate directed space of social reality», we shall designate schematically their connection as the centred circle (Fig.) with basic research concept «social competence of lyceum student» in the centre.

Sharing the point of view of the most Ukrainian educationalists, we examine the social competence of lyceum students as difficult integral formation of personality; holistic and dynamic system of cognitive, activity and personality features.

 

Fig. Chart of connection of basic concepts

 

Social competence of lyceum student (SCLS) we shall understand as integral property of personality, represented by the system of personal traits and features, capabilities and socially meaningful faculties providing accordance of individual to his social group and determines the achievement of successful realization of own and publicly meaningful aims in heterogeneous society.

Applying four-level analysis after I. Blowbergh and E. Yudin for categories «social competence» and «key competence» we did such conclusions:

-  all the competences are social (in wide sense of this word), because they are produced, formed and function in society, their substance is social as well;

-  social competence is a key one, as it is generalized complex of the obtained knowledge, abilities and relations that is set in the process of mastering of all content of education and provides the normal vital functions of a person in society;

-  social competence is formed and appears in social, educational, public activity;

-  social competence (in the narrow understanding of word) characterizes a person as social creature, as a subject of vital functions, having mutual relations with society,  relationships with other people.

Thus SCLS can be regarded as the key competence of any person necessary to perform successfully functions of a citizen, family member, individual in heterogeneous society.

Literature

1.      Компетентностный подход в педагогическом образовании : коллект. моногр. / под ред. В. А. Козырева, Н. Ф. Родионовой, А. П. Тряпициной. – СПб. : Изд-во РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена, 2005. – С.– 77.– 392 с.

2.      Пометун О.І. Теорія і практика послідовної реалізації компетентнісного підходу в досвіді зарубіжних країн / О.Пометун // Компетентнісний підхід у сучасній освіті: світовий досвід та українські перспективи : колект. монографія / під заг. ред. О.В.Овчарук. – К. : К.І.С., 2004. – С.17.