Presented by:

 Romana Levytska

                                                                                     Scientific advisor:

                                                                                    Onchulenko M.I.

Êàôåäðà ãåðìàíñüêîãî, çàãàëüíîãî

òà ïîð³âíÿëüíîãî ìîâîçíàâñòâà

×åðí³âåöüêèé íàö³îíàëüíèé

óí³âåðñèòåò ³ì.. Þ. Ôåäüêîâè÷à

âóë.. Êîöþáèíñüêîãî, 2, ì. ×åðí³âö³, 58012   

 

Clitics in Politic Discourse

     During the last few decades, contracted forms have been studied by scholars with different aims. Some have focused on grammatical and register-related factors, conditioning the use of contractions in corpora of spoken and written English (Black (1977), Forsheden (1983), Hiller (1984), Kjellmer (1995)); others, within the framework of generative syntax, have concentrated on ‘knock-out’ factors, blocking contraction of auxiliaries (Zwicky (1970), King (1970), Kaisse (1983) and (1985)). It is generally accepted that contracted forms are primarily a feature of spoken, informal English. The role of contracted not in spoken American English characterized by discoursensituationsnandnspeakerninteractionnofndifferentnkindsnhasnbeenninvestigatednbynYaeger-Drorn(1996). The object of the present article is contracted forms, theirnclassificationnandnpeculiarmfeaturesminmpoliticalmdiscourse.                                                                                                                       The subject of the investigation is the usage of clitics in political discourse.                                      The actuality of the chosen topic is caused by necessity:

1)     To observe the contracted forms and their classification;

2)     To determine what discourse(political discourse) is;

3)     To study the frequency of usage of clitics in political discourse.

The aim of the present work is to determine the frequency of usage of contracted forms in political discourse, on the basis of B. Obama’s discourse.

     The clitic is called a bound morph and it seems to occupy an intermediate position between an affix and a word. The clitic is divided into two groups, proclitic and enclitic [3]. A subgroup of clitic which is attached at the beginning of a stem is called a proclitic. Another group of clitic which is attached at the end of a stem is called an enclitic (e.g. I’ve been to that house. =I have been to that house. It’s hard to believe. = It is hard to believe.). Other types of clitic are mesoclitic and endoclitic. Mesoclitic is a clitc which appears between the stem of the host and other affixes (e.g. rock'n'roll). Endoclitic is a clitic which splits apart the root and is inserted between the two pieces [2].

     We also can distinguish informal (which are short forms of other words that people use when speaking casually, e.g. gimme = give me, ya = you, lemme = let me) and formal contractions. We may divide clitics into positive (e.g. I’m, he’s, we’ve) and negative (don’t, isn’t, won’t). Contracted forms may also be divided into positive (aux-contractions) and negative (not-contractions). Aux-contraction or verb-contraction is a shortened form of two words one of which is a verb (e.g. I’ll, he’s, and we’re). Not-contraction are contracted forms in which verb is used with not (isn’t, wasn’t, hadn’t).

Contracted forms are used either in informal or formal communication, e.g. political discourse.

     Discourse (L. discursus, "running to and from") means either "written or spoken communication or debate" or "a formal discussion or debate [7]."                      Political discourse-is a discourse the purpose of which is to create consensus among citizens as to which course of action will best solve a problem. To define the frequency of usage of clitics in political discourse, we will use discourses of American President B. Obama.

     In discourses of B. Obama positive contracted forms have a higher frequency of usage than negative contractions. In general B Obama used 78 positive contracted forms.  The most prominent positive contraction used by B. Obama is I’m (13.78 %). A high frequency of usage also has such positive contractions as I’ll (8.58 %), we’re (7.8 %) ( e.g. But we are certainly taking into account what we are hearing in the field, from mid-level officers and a general assessment that we’re receiving from them, is the same assessment that you’re reporting in the newspapers, which is that the surge has had some impact that is to be hoped for [4].), it’s (7.02 %) (According to reports, it's reached a tentative deal with Senate Democrats that would make it much harder for opposition Republicans to block the reforms being proposed in next year's budget [5].) and I’ve, we’ve (6.24 %). More rarely B. Obama uses such positive contractions: you’ve, you’ll (4.68 %), we’ll, you’ve (3.9 %), it’ll (3.12 %), it’d, they’re (2.34 %) and they’ve (1.56 %). In general B. Obama used in his speeches 61 negative contracted forms.  The most prominent negative contraction (not-contraction) used by B. Obama is shouldn’t (7.32 %). A high frequency of usage also has such not-contractions as hasn’t (6.1 %), isn’t, don’t (5.49 %) (e. g. It would appear that the White House isn't prepared to sacrifice its plans to reform the country's health care system on the altar of bi-partisanship [5]. "Don't be discouraged by what's happened in the last few weeks," Mr. Obama told a large audience who applauded and cheered when he first appeared before them [6].), wasn’t, didn’t (4.88 %), aren’t, doesn’t, mustn’t and weren’t (4.27 %). And more rarely B. Obama uses such negative contracted forms: needn’t, hadn’t, can’t (3.66 %), won’t (3.05 %) and couldn’t (2.44 %). 

Bibliography

1.     Compact Oxford Dictionary, Thesaurus and Wordpower Guide. - New York: OUP, 2001. - 121 p.

Illustrative Sources:

2.     www.supaproofread.com

3.     EnglisnClub.com

4.     Hishman Melhem. Interview of the President. http://news.bbc.co.uk

5.     Obama diary: The first 100 days. http://news.bbc.co.uk

6.     Marc Ambinder. Obama Reaffirms Support for CIA. http://news.bbc.co.uk