The doctoral candidate of PhD, ZH.S. Bulkhairova

Management chair,   Kazakh Agro Technical University of S.Seifullin, Kazakhstan

Economic assessment of human capital management in Kazakhstan agrarian sector

 

The agricultural economic sector is the main industry not only to ensure food security in Kazakhstan, but also for sustainable economic growth, because villages are the source of growth human resources for all economic sectors [1]. In modern conditions of economic development the person is not only objective, but also a resource for social and economic development. The resource is important, growing, which is able to take one of the most important place among the other development factors.

Today human capital as an investment becomes as important as basic capital, technology, that speaks about human values as economic capital. Human capital is the foundation; the base being formed in modern world, including Kazakhstan, innovation economy and knowledge society. This understanding its role is growing all over the world and there is a gradual reversal of policy towards the world to strengthen and increase human potential. Thus, human capital becomes the core axis around which revolves the most other factors of business transformation [2].

At the present moment, it is possible to allocate the following definitions of human capital:

-The human capital is formed as the result of investments and the accumulated human knowledge, abilities, skills, motivations, skills and health, which contributes to promoting the growth of labor productivity and population's incomes.

The human capital (HC) is a universal, independent component "production process", which provides additional cost of the product, including: biological aspects; social dimension; the economic aspect [3].

- The human capital is intensive productive and social factor, which is accumulated through investment in intellectual property, information equipment, labor and livelihoods, education, training, knowledge, innovation and institutional capacities, economic freedom, entrepreneurial ability and entrepreneurial climate, science, culture and art, the safety and health of the population [4].

The main elements of human capital include the following items: capital education, including general and special knowledge; the capital of training on the work (qualifications, skills, work experience); capital health; having economically relevant information (for example, price, revenue; trends); capital migration to workers mobility; motivation of labor activity.

Today on socio-economic conditions of human capital development in the agrarian sector can say the following:

- the growth of the rural population occurred at 240,40 thousand people in 2012, compared with 2008, while the total population in Kazakhstan during the same period increased by 1101,57 thousand people (table 1);

- increase of employment in rural area on 96 thousand people in 2012, compared with 2008, but in the same year, a decline of employed population in agriculture, forestry and fisheries on 195,6 thousand people (table 1).

 

Table 1 - Dynamics of human capital development in the agrarian sector in Kazakhstan (thousand people)

 

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Absolution

increase 2012

by 2008 yy.

The employed rural population

3 800,40

3 790,90

3 873,80

3 892,30

3 896,40

96,00

Employed population in agriculture, forestry and fisheries rural population

2 369,70

2 326,40

2 294,90

2 196,10

2 174,10

-195,60

Rural population

7 305,57

7 319,45

7 383,66

7 466,70

7 545,97

240,40

The total population in Kazakhstan Republic

15 572

15 982

16 203

16 440

16 673

1 101,57

The share of rural population in total population, %

46,92

45,80

45,57

45,42

45,26

-1,66

Source: compiled by the author based on the data of the statistics agency in  Kazakhstan

 

According to data of the statistics agency in Kazakhstan [6] in 2012, compared with 2008, it is a reduction in the share of wage workers in agriculture (hunting and forestry) from 676,0 to 653.2 thousand persons, i.e. by 22.8 thousand people. Also during this period, it is a decrease of employed population in farms from 387,3 to 347,4 thousand people in Kazakhstan, where the relative growth is 0,90 in 2012, compared with 2008. Self-employed people in agriculture, forestry and fisheries decreased by 140,8 thousand people in 2012, compared with 2008. In relation to the number of the unemployed population in agriculture, forestry and fisheries, it is a decrease by 8.2 thousand respectively for the studied period.

At the present time, according to data of the statistics agency in Kazakhstan [6], there was an absolute increase of the average nominal wage in agriculture in 2012, compared with 2008, on 2014 tenge, but when compared to the level of wages in the economy as a whole for the same year throughout the country, the absolute increase will have negative dynamics -0,46%. As for the growth of nominal wage in 2012 to 2008 in agriculture to the subsistence minimum of working population, there is an increase on 53.4%.

Also it is increase the wage fund in agriculture (hunting and forestry) in 2012, compared with 2008, by 18 284 tenge, which, according to the author, is a slight increase. Because agriculture is characterized by difficult working conditions, seasonal agricultural work, low level of infrastructure in rural areas, there is a need to increase salaries to encourage older workers and involving in this industry new employees. It leads to a decrease in the share of rural population in the total population: there was a decrease in 2012, compared with 2008, by 1.66%, a gradual process of reducing the population living in rural areas.

Regarding the structure of employed population in agriculture (hunting and forestry) for the working age, it is a reduction the population, especially in working age (25-54 years), i.e. the absolute increase in 2012, compared with 2008, amounted to a negative trend -77,00 thousand people. And, as you know, this dynamics has a negative impact on the growth of agricultural production and, finally, will lead to even greater decline in the agricultural sector.

Thus, there is a disproportionate increase in the level of the qualitative parameters human capital employed in agriculture, as often it happens a decreasing tendency.

Thus, modernization in the agricultural sector increases the degree of intensity and tension labor in the agricultural organizations, which significantly improves the quality requirements the human capital. At the moment in Kazakhstan farms growth has been observed load the resource potential for human capital an average of almost 2 times in 2012, compared with 2008. For example, if you take the index - average annual employee's gross output in agriculture is in 2012 compared to 2008, the increase in 1,88 (can say almost in 2 times). That is, despite the crisis and other various symptoms, still in agriculture, namely in farms it is growing.

Therefore, to ensure the competitiveness of agrarian sector in economy is possible only on condition, in which formed a sufficient high level of human capital and its effective usage [5]. The  development human capital requires constant and volume cost. The share of domestic expenditure on research and development in Kazakhstan to GDP amounted 0,17% in 2012 and decreased absolute increase on 0.05% in comparison with 2008. As for domestic expenditure on agriculture, the growth dynamic in 2012 (5018,4 KZT million) compared with 2008 (2 620,2 million tenge), namely, the absolute increase is 2398,2 million tenge. That is, there is a need to increase domestic expenditures on research and development in order to further improvement and development of human capital in Kazakhstan.

 

So, to ensure the full human capital development it is possible, on the one hand, only when a significant level of living, and on the other, it is the high level life creates favorable conditions for the human capital development and its further improvement. And only the high level of human capital development is able to create conditions for further economic growth and competitiveness of the country, the growth of rural life quality in the conditions of modern trends and the world requirements. To solve these problems it is necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the implementation system (human resources management), namely: investment in human capital development in rural areas; increasing the competitiveness of agricultural producers and, consequently, their profitability; to ensure sustainable development in rural areas; reduce the level of unemployment in rural areas; increase the life quality in rural residents.

 

The list of the used literature:

1. Карнаухов Е. В. Повышение качества человеческого капитала в агропромышленном комплексе России как способ повышения качества жизни сельского населения / Е. В. Карнаухов // Молодой ученый. — 2011. — №4. Т.1. — С. 151-153.

2. Сагадиев К.А. Человеческий капитал и факторы роста в Казахстане,//Международная научная конференция «Человеческий капитал в Казахстане: состояние и перспективы роста», - Астана, 2013

3. Человеческий капитал Красноярского края: Форсайт-исследование – 2030// Аналитический доклад; под ред. В.С.Ефимова. Красноярск: Сибирский федеральный университет, - 2010,- 127 с.

4. Корчагин Ю.А. Человеческий капитал и процессы развития на макро и микроуровнях// Воронеж: ЦИРЭ,- 2004, - 122 с.

5. Каменева К.П. Человеческий капитал аграрного сектора экономики: особенности оценки и направления развития// Теоретический и научно-практический журнал «Вестник ОрелГАУ», - №6(21), - декабрь 2009 г.- с.33-37.

6. Интернет источник – официальный сайт Агентства Статистики РК: stat.gov.kz