THE BASIC DIRECTIONS OF IMPROVEMENT OF QUALITY THE UAV EXTERNAL SURFACES

Prof. Nickolay Zosimovych

Sharda University, Uttar Pradesh, India

nzosimovich@yandex.ru  

 

As a result of perfection of forms modern and perspective UAV probes of typical geometrical parameters of a surface have been made and the technique of appointment of admissions on external surfaces is offered.

Key words: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), surface, aerodynamic quality, sinuosity, technological roughness’s, ledge, indent, constructive and technological actions, fuselage, fuel consumption, specifications, flying vehicle (FV).

 

Introduction. Increase of efficiency UAV is caused, on the one side, by a problem of fuel resources, and with another side a tendency of change of structure of expenses for life cycle aside reduction of a share of initial FV cost. Aircraft engineering practice marks following basic ways of increase of FV efficiency [312]:

1.     Application of essentially new constructive decisions and materials (10…20%).

2.     Perfection of engines (20…30 %).

3.     Aerodynamics perfection (to 40 %).

The importance and urgency of improving the aerodynamic efficiency by improving the forms of modern and advanced FV, including by improving the quality of exterior surfaces, confirmed by the entire history of aviation.

Detailed consideration of dependence of resistance from quality of performance of external surfaces by manufacture shows that additional resistance can reach 2…10% at zero upward force [315]. The greatest share is brought by the deviations increasing a lateral section, details for example acting in a stream (approximately 5 %). Nearby 1.2 … 1.5 % are necessary on rivets and bolts connections; 0.5 % on joints of sheets; leaky position of shutters and hatches gives 1.0…1.5 %; rough coloring (over 20 microns) – up to  

At speed from above М=1.5 the size of all components increases approximately twice and resistance from a sinuosity - more than in 5 times. For the reasons specified above the resistance increase through technological roughness’s for subsonic FV makes approximately 5…6 %, and for supersonic (М=2-3) - 10…16% [315].

Perfection of quality of external surfaces probably at the expense of constructive and technological actions that in turn can lead to additional expenses. Therefore an important question at definition of quality of external surfaces is the choice of criterion for quantitative estimations of similar actions. As such criterion for a quantitative estimation of losses from additional resistance it is possible to accept the expense or fuel cost. The expediency of an estimation of such kind is obvious, as fuel consumption is unique precisely measured parameter at the given design stage UAV, directly reflecting infringement of aerodynamics of a surface, both in manufacture, and in operation [313].

Problem statement. In development of designs FV and, accordingly, technologies of their manufacture always crucial importance had constant increase in speeds of flight [312]. Growth of speeds of flight not only causes of application of new, more and more heat-resistant materials (fig. 1), but also is accompanied still nearby important for development of the production technology of tendencies [234].

Рис. 1. Growing of speeds of flight of FV: 1) for aluminum designs; 2) for titanium designs; 3) for designs from special steels; 4) for designs from special alloys; 5) for subsonic UAV

 

It first of all concerns change of forms of units FV [316, 317]. Simple rectilinear forms of surfaces of units of a glider in process of growth of speeds pass in complex surfaces of double curvature. To the production technology the total disappearance of cylindrical formations of fuselages is essential almost at speeds from above М=0.85 and linear surfaces of wings and plumage, since the speeds from above М=2.0. On change by their surfaces characterized by complex enough laws of formation of the form come [315].

The proceeding increase in speeds (at least to М=3,5…4,5) causes toughening of requirements to accuracy of the external contours, interfaced to serious problems in the field of technology and designing of units [317].

Deviation of elements of a surface from a theoretical contour, a raising of heads of bolts, rivets, screws in a stream, steps, a roughness etc. on everyone concrete FV or group of planes are appointed in specifications developers.

Maximum deviations on elements of aerodynamic surfaces are defined proceeding from admissible sizes of additional resistance and flow conditions on various modes. As a rule, specifications on the form and quality of a surface of the airplane provide division of units into zones according to their importance in formation of a streamline stream. Typical requirements to parameters of quality of surfaces UAV are in a range of  мм [312].

To the first zone carry surfaces of units to which increased requirements on quality of a flow are shown. Higher requirements are accepted for a wing  мм, less high ones for a fuselage at great numbers and thickness of an interface. Conditions of preservation of a laminar flow are put in a basis of requirements at small numbers as there is an opinion that roughness’s start to influence, if their height exceeds a thickness of a laminar local layer [134].

Additional resistance from a surface sinuosity is in sedate dependence on size of a deviation of a surface and its position concerning a forward edge [35]. This circumstance is considered in specifications at definition of zones of surfaces of units.

Taking into account similar reasons restrictions of size of local roughness’s of type of ledges, ledges, cracks and fixture heads are generated мм [312]. 

Results of researches. By working out of constructive and technological decisions it is necessary to define the requirements shown to quality of object of manufacture and technological processes, in particular to appoint maximum deviations of aerodynamic surfaces.

To typical deviations of geometrical parameters of elements carry out next [312]:

1) smooth deviations from the theoretical contour, measured by comparison of an actual surface from the ideal. In practice as the ideal accept a surface set in one of systems:

а) the measuring machine on the basis of mathematical model of a surface;

б) reference surface in the form of its breadboard model;

в) flat carriers of the form and the sizes at use plaza and sample methods, means of spatial coordination, control templates or assembly equipment;

2) eminence of one part of a surface over another against a stream (so-called ‘step’) or on a stream (‘ledge’). Geometrical parameters appreciate by results of excess measurements;

3) smoothness of transition of one part of a surface in another (so-called ‘sinuosity’), characterized in the length of a wave and amplitude. The sinuosity is classified on character of display [321] - cylindrical or spatial. This kind of an error of an external surface is defined by discrepancy of manufacturing and design assemblage in which result there are the internal pressure covering all sections or its parts. Local deformations occur owing to formation of connections (rivets, welded seams). Sinuosity measure or concerning a base line, a tangent to the maximum roughness (ruler), or by results of comparison of an actual surface with ideal [312]. At a smooth deviation of contours on sinuosity size on base makes where is scope of an error. At the set size of the admission it is necessary to accept

4) local excess of elements of a surface in the form of acting (sinking down) heads of fixture. These errors are registered by means of universal and special measuring instruments. The basic geometrical parameters of deviations are the height and diameter [321];

5) cracks through or without an exit between elements of a surface of the unit. These errors also are measured by universal tools or special templates and characterized by the relation of width to depth т.е.  or the admission for width of a through crack [321];

6) punching of an external surface of the unit owing to defects of a surface. These errors are limited by an equivalent aperture on area unit [312] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. The typical geometrical parameters of a surface limited to admissions: 1) cylindrical sinuosity; 2) spatial sinuosity; 3) crack (a backlash); 4) ledge against a stream; 5) ledge on a stream; 6) punching

 

Admissions on a relative positioning of global surfaces of separate units and units among themselves in this case are not considered.

Technique of appointment of admissions on external contours of flying vehicles. For the purpose of definition of a generality of the constructive and technological decisions accepted in specifications, revealing of the reasons defining size of the admission have been analyzed specifications for more 30 FV various types and appointment.

Fig. 2. Dependence of change of the admission on a deviation from a contour of the unit from speed

Fig. 3. Dependence of change of the admission on parameters of a sinuosity of a surface from speed

Fig. 4. Dependence of change of the admission on parameters of a ledge of a surface from speed

Fig. 5. Dependence of change of the admission on parameters of a crack of a surface from speed

Fig. 6. Dependence of change of the admission on immersing parameters in a surface from speed

Fig. 7. Dependence of change of the admission on parameters of a ledge from a surface in from speed

 

On Fig. 2-7 the schedules constructed by results of statistical processing set in specifications of admissions are presented.

Conclusion. The analysis of appointment of admissions on external surfaces of units FV, practice of their appointment and realization in manufacture allow to draw following conclusions:

1.     Practically FV in one interval of numbers admissions on performance of geometrical elements of an external surface are identical to all and decrease with growth  Admissions for supersonic UAV approximately twice it is less, than admissions for the subsonic ones. The general feature is the task of various requirements for a wing, plumage, a fuselage, gondolas and flows. The highest requirements to quality of an external surface are shown to a wing, as to the unit creating carrying force.

2.     Necessity of decrease in weight and durability increase has caused transition from a traditional modular design for power compartments to the monolithic. Application of composite materials that has led to change of conditions of realization of the admissions set on external contours extends. In due to manufacture automation methods of the task and means of reproduction of surfaces forming contour UAV will change. In these circumstances of a condition of realization of admissions it is necessary to consider in two aspects: in design, i.e. according to the possibilities of formation of the set accuracy of contours put in a design, and in industrial and technological, i.e. according to possibilities of existing and perspective technological processes and the equipment providing set accuracy.

3.     Experimental researches of the isolated roughness are put in a basis of calculation of resistance from roughness’s taking into account its site in the boundary layer. The roughness height is defined by admissible size of additional resistance . Practical technique to an establishment of dependences and functional communications between values of admissions and expenses by the generalized criterion and consequently, and to a choice of economically optimum admissions, still it is not defined unequivocally. Therefore for the generalized criterion accept additional fuel consumption because of resistance of roughnesses, as influence of additional resistance on speed almost slightly.

 

References

1.      Негреба В.А., Фирсов В.А., Бобрыкин Ю.А. Технологические основы проектирования конструкций самолетов. – М.: МАИ, 1986. – 43 с.                                                                                               

2.      Краснов Н.Ф., Захарченко В.Ф., Кошевой В.Н. Основы аэродинамического расчета. Трение и теплопередача. Управление обтеканием летательных аппаратов / Под ред. Проф. Н.Ф. Краснова: Учебное пособие для студентов втузов. – М.: Высш. шк., 1984. – 264 с.                                          

3.      Мероприятия зарубежных авиакомпаний по экономии топлива. – Техническая информация ЦВГИ, 1981, № 9, с. 30-32.    

4.      Горобець С.М. Основи комп’ютерної графіки: Навч. пос. / За ред.. М.В. Лемківського. – К.: Центр навчальної літератури, 2006. – 232. 

5.      Вигдорчик С.А. Технологические основы проектирования и конструирования самолетов. Часть 1. – М.: МАИ, 1974. – 140 с.

6.      Проблемы строительной механики и прочности ЛА: Тем. сборник науч. тр. / МАИ. – М.: МАИ, 1990. – 72 с.                     

7.      Зосимович М.В., Шелудченко Б.А., Войцицький А.П. Еколого-економічне обґрунтування проекту утилізації радіоактивних відходів в далекий космос при міжнародній співпраці // Вісник Сумського державного аграрного університету. - 2001. -  Т. 1 - Суми:  вид-во “Козацький вал”.- С. 75-80.                                 

8.      Прочность, устойчивость, колебания: Справочник в 3-х т. / Под ред. И.А. Биргера и Я.Г. Пановко. – М.: Машиностроение, 1968. – Т. 3.                                                                                                    

9.       Фирсов В.А. Воспроизведение обводов самолета в системе автоматизированного проектирования. – М.: МАИ, 1978. – 72 с.