Rajabov Nariman Sharifbaevich PhD, Associate Professor
Senior science researcher at Tashkent state university of law, 
SOME LEGAL QUESTIONS OF RATIONING WITHDRAWAL OF MINERALS IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN
Abstract: The article analyzes the issues of further improving the environmental regulatory system in the field of subsoil use. Special attention is given to the procedure for establishing environmental standards with seizures minerals.
Keywords: environmental standard, environmental valuation. Types of environmental standards, the subsoil, subsoil, quotas and limits subsoil withdrawal.
In the Republic of Uzbekistan in order to regulate the relations arising from the possession, use and disposal of mineral resources, the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan adopted it. «On Subsoil», which is the main tasks, is to ensure the rational and integrated use of mineral resources to meet the needs in the mineral raw materials and other needs. 
The question of rationing the use of resources if the subsoil be considered sufficiently developed, we can say it's a moot point, because in science, and at this time the issue is particularly also of strategic importance. Questions of environmental regulation exemption subsurface is complex and beyond the scope of its own legal decisions. Accordingly, the establishment of environmental standards for maximum permissible extraction of minerals or subsurface resources in the economic and investment positions do not take into account the laws of the market in modern times. 
Actually, the introduction of standards in the field of subsoil use can meet the objections and in the political aspect. Therefore, the natural question arises about how it will react to foreign consumers or investors to reduce their supply due to the introduction of standards. Considering that, in accordance with Art.55 of the Constitution, mineral resources constitute the national wealth, and shall be rationally used and protected by the state. In this context, investors will be forced to seek other supplier countries, and therefore in addition to the sales market losses will decrease government revenue that is highly undesirable. Therefore, taking into account the current state of the global economy and the economy of its voluntary renunciation of mineral resources supply or reduce the volume of their improbable. 
Further, removal of subsurface resources regulations are to limit the extraction of these mineral resources, which, in turn, will affect the budget. Moreover, in the end the success of the policy implemented in the country is directly related to income from the sale of mineral resources, and the establishment of these standards. They inevitably reduce and reduce the investment attractiveness of deposits, the interest of users of mineral resources. In investing in the development of production and infrastructure. In legal literature, the concept of ecological regulation refers to the procedure established by the authorized bodies of environmental regulations and their application in practice, as well, is to find the limit values ​​of environmental loads. In order to be able to set limits to control actions on the valuation object, at which the valuation purpose.
The scientific literature has repeatedly made proposals on the feasibility of the introduction of legislation on subsoil and special regulations seizure of minerals in the context of mineral resource security.
For example accurate economic indicators according R.Yamaletdinova "To ensure that in the aspect of the mineral resources security based on the valuation of withdrawal of minerals should be: a) the needs of the internal market in mineral resources by type, data in recent years and the projected level of development of these indicators over the next 10 - 15 years; b) external market demands with regard to the obligations to supply the export of energy resources; c) data on the total amount of proven reserves by type of minerals (alone and off balance sheet).
As well as scientists from different countries argue rationing is called among the principal legal environmental protection measures. According A.I.Perchik, the main objective standards of permissible extraction of minerals is to regulate the depletion process. Scientists believe that the valuation of withdrawal of subsoil resources aimed at protecting not bowels themselves, and the vital interests of enterprises, people from the threat of depletion (lack of natural resources).
On this basis, the emergence of standards for exemption minerals actually means banning the procedure for obtaining super-profits in the mining industry or in the field.
It can be emphasized in the current environmental legislation enshrined the general provisions on the rationing of permissible extraction of natural environment components are contained in Art. 16 of the Law " On Environmental Protection " according to which nature is allowed, provided the safety of habitable natural environment , use of natural resources within the limits set by the relevant regulations , and to ensure the regeneration of renewable and renewable natural resources . 
In a number of natural resource legislation provisions on the standardization of permissible extraction of natural resources available, and in the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan " On Subsoil " position on normalization of withdrawal minerals are missing and does not contain any provisions on the removal of regulations minerals , or on the order of their establishment and use. Therefore, in our opinion should establish rules also amend about rationing mining. 
In this sense, to develop a mechanism for the implementation of a sub- environmental regulation. In addition, in terms of increasing the investment attractiveness of optimum standards could be established by agreement, pre-negotiate the contract terms. 
In addition, some scientists, experts suggest criteria that for each field, by type of mineral allowable exemption regulations can be installed separately. In any case, standards will have to be installed so that the payback period in the development of investor funds deposits was foreseeable real. That is, the removal of regulations may not only serve the interests of protection of mineral resources. Also to become an effective instrument of state policy in the sphere of subsoil use. Therefore, we believe that, in future mining operations should be carried out sparingly, and mining industry needs to focus on the interests of future generations, sustainable development is not only modern, but also the future of our country.