PhD, Associate professor Ilina L.A.
Samara State Technical University, Russia
MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES:
FORMATION OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES
Efficient management of human
resources becomes especially important along with efficient management of
technology of the enterprise in modern condition. It is very important to spend
essential updating of economic strategy and to realize a number of
organizational-structural decisions.
Management of human resources
is one of the most difficult and significant subsystems of any manufacturing
production. The key factor of a successful activity of an enterprise in the
conditions of market relations is the use of labor potential of workers. In
aspiration to increase of management efficiency by the personnel the reference
to experience of other countries, studying and generalization of achievements
of foreign scientific thought and economic practice is reasonably useful.
Human Resource Management is a
set of interrelated functions and processes undertaken to attract, develop,
motivate and maintain a high performing workforce within an organization. The
essence of HRM therefore is to bring different people with various
socio-cultural backgrounds to work together to achieve the organization's
objectives. This is achieved by ensuring the congruence of organizational
objectives with the needs of the employees. Employees are the most important
resource of an organization since they possess capabilities, knowledge, skills
and competencies that allow the organization to achieve their objectives.
Michael Armstrong defined HRM
as the strategic and coherent approach to the management of the organization's
most valued assets - the people working there who individually and collectively
contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the business.
The recent interest in the HR
research–practice “gap” has evolved from speculation to empirical evidence.
Other authors distinguish
three major subfields of human resource management: micro HRM (MHRM), strategic
HRM (SHRM) and international HRM (IHRM).
Micro HRM covers the
subfunctions of HR policy and practice and consists of two main categories: one
with managing individuals and small groups for example recruitment, selection,
induction, training and development, performance management, and remuneration.
Strategic HRM covers the
overall HR strategies adopted by business units and companies and tries to
measure their impacts on performance. Within this domain both design and
execution issues are examined.
International HRM covers HRM
in companies operating across national boarders.
Sustainable development over
the long term, one of oil and gas industry Companies key priorities, depends on
constant improvement of responsible work practices throughout the Company’s
operations and enhancement of the overall labor efficiency. Therefore,
Companies is focused on implementing the highest standards of business conduct,
relevant compensation and performance incentive schemes, as well as
comprehensive social measures to improve the quality of life of its employees
and their families. Effective motivation of personal effort is central to
Companies HR policy, and is crucial to continuously improving overall Company
performance.
Let's take JSC Rosneft as an
example. One of the Company's key priorities is constant improvement of
responsible work practices throughout the Company’s operations and enhancement
of the overall labor efficiency. Therefore, the Company focuses on
implementation of the highest standards of business conduct, relevant
compensation and performance incentive schemes, as well as comprehensive social
measures to improve the quality of life of its employees and their families.
Effective motivation of personal effort is the focus of the Company's HR
policy, and is crucial to continuously improving overall Company performance. A
need in JSC Rosneft dynamic development in the competitive medium, demographic
situation in the country made support and development of youth one of the
high-priority tasks. The special place in personnel selection of the
organizations is occupied with work with young experts. Introduction of the
status of the young expert is aimed at creation of conditions for their
professional growth and the maximum realization of creative potential.
Growth of deficiency of a
manpower aims many large enterprises already now as much as possible to
increase a share of young experts and workers in total of accepted workers.
Deficiency of highly skilled experts promotes that employers show the
increasing interest to students and young experts. Young experts are potential
which yet in a due measure is used by the majority of the companies and the
organizations.
The Company offers their
employees equal opportunities to continuously develop their skills and
abilities. A comprehensive strategy of personnel development is crucial in the
Company’s HR policy. The Company's belief is that professional excellence can
be achieved through continuous training of their staff. Training programs,
which are available for all groups of employees, are developed in cooperation
with leading national and international educational establishments.
Success of the leading
companies in the developed countries shows that they have effective mechanisms
of HR-management at the organization level.
Problems in the area of a
management of human resources and daily work with shots in immediate prospects
will constantly be in the center of attention of a management, according to
experts. With development of scientific and technical progress, the maintenance
and working conditions will be got greatest by value, than a material interest,
in the future.
Management of human resources
is a system of theoretic and methodological sights at understanding and
definition of essence, the maintenance, the purposes, problems, principles and
management methods a professional training, and also organizational-practical
approaches to formation of the mechanism of its realization in concrete
operating conditions of the organization.
References
1. Armstrong, Michael (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource
Management Practice (10th ed.). London: Kogan Page. ISBN 0-7494-4631-5.
OCLC 62282248).
2. Boxall, P., Purcell, J., & Wright, P. M.
(2007). Human resource management: Scope, analysis and significance. In P.
Boxall, J. Purcell, & P. M. Wright (Eds.), The handbook of human resource
management (pp. 1−16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Burke, M. J., Drasgow, F., & Edwards, J. E.
(2004). Closing science-practice knowledge gaps: Contributions of psychological
research to human resource management. Human Resource Management, 43(4),
299−304.
4. Cascio, W.F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Industrial
and organizational psychology 1963–2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 93, 10621081.
5. Deadrick, D. L., & Gibson, P. A. (2007). An
examination of the research–practice gap in HR: Comparing topics of interest to
HR academics and HR practitioners. Human Resource Management Review, 17(2),
131−139.
6. Deadrick, D. L., & Gibson, P. A. (2009). Revisiting the
research–practice gap in HR: A longitudinal analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 19 (2009) 144–153.
7. Lengnick-Hall M. L., Lengnick-Hall C. A., Andrade
L.S., Drake B. (2009). Strategic human resource management: The evolution of
the field. Human Resource Management Review 19 (2009) 64–85.
8. Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (1999). Knowing
“what” to do is not enough: Turning knowledge into action. California
Management Review, 42(1), 83−109.
9. Rynes, S. L., Colbert, A. E., & Brown, K. G.
(2002). HR practitioners' beliefs about effective human resource practices:
Correspondence between research and practice. Human Resource Management, 41(2),
149−174.
10. Rynes, S. L., Giluk, T. L., & Brown, K. G.
(2007). The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in
HRM: Implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal,
50(5), 987−1008.
11. Óïðàâëåíèå ÷åëîâå÷åñêèìè ðåñóðñàìè îðãàíèçàöèè: ôîðìèðîâàíèå êîíêóðåíòíûõ
ïðåèìóùåñòâ è ôîðìèðîâàíèå ñòðàòåãèè ïðåäïðèÿòèé ñôåðû óñëóã: ìîíîãð. / Ã.Ï.
Ãàãàðèíñêàÿ, Ë.À. Èëüèíà, Î.Þ. Êàëìûêîâà, À.Â. Áûêîâà. – Ñàìàðà: Ñàìàð. ãîñ.
òåõí. óí-ò, 2010. – 460 ñ.