Doctor of Science Medvedev A., postgraduate student Maltseva T.

Siberian State Aerospace University named after Academician M. F. Reshetnev

On a new approach to the identification of complex processes

Introduction. It is expedient to use all measurable variables while of multidimensional discrete-continuous processes modeling and control but it requires a detailed analysis of not only the process itself, but also the control tools and techniques of all the available variables, as well as a priori information that can correspond to different levels [3]. The omission of variables, nature and the discreteness of measurement and control of different types of a priori information, as well as some «liberty» in making certain assumptions that are inevitable when a mathematical formulation of the problem can lead finally to negative consequences. All these questions due to a large number of variables and the high complexity of the internal connections of the studied processes (Fig. 1) are often omitted in the modeling problems investigation from a theoretical point of view.

Ïîäïèñü: Input signalsÏîäïèñü: Output signals
 

 


                    

 

 

 

 

Fig. 1. General scheme of the multidimensional multiply process

It is simply impossible when solving the same applied problems when the investigated process is for sure multidimensional and multiply connected. In this paper we will present models of this type processes.

Nonparametric combined models. Often while studying the real process we are facing the situation when information about the form of some of its correlations is missed that leads to the greater complexity in obtaining their parametric models. However, some correlations technical, technological features, can be described parametrically or even can follow the known laws of physical, chemical, electrical, mechanical and other phenomena. Thus, different communication process can be studied in different degrees, i.e. a priori information can belong to different levels. As a consequence, the various mathematical problem statement from the mathematical point of view in the framework of one of the modeling problem of the interested process.

The objective necessity to get models of the similar processes, a lack of a priori information, the random factors influence, with unknown characteristics, discrepancy  by sampling for measuring, and a lack and imperfection of measuring complexes leads to assumptions and hypotheses about the investigated process that often have little connection to the reality. The “ignorance” about the structure must be unfortunately replaced, saying, «Let the process be described by the equation of the following form...» and the restriction of the control means by «Let such factors are not changed /do not influence the process…» and so on. If our assumptions are close enough to the reality, so we can rely on success in the problem solving (indeed, a large number of the processes based on fundamental laws and can be described with a high degree of accuracy), and if the assumptions are too rough, it seems, there exist two methods. The first one is to fill our «ignorance» about the process, when it will be possible to make an accurate problem from a mathematical point of view. The second one is development of the mathematical approach adequate to the level of a priori information we have. In this paper, we will follow the second method.
Mathematical models of processes built in conditions, when a priori information about the investigated process may simultaneously belong to several levels, and be based on the three pillars: fundamental laws, parameterized dependencies and connections reflecting only the dependence nature of some process variables from others and will be called
Ê-models[3].

Let’s take an example of Ê- models building of some technological process which complexity is represented not only in the large dimension of the vector variables, but in the presence of backward and cross flows in technological complex (Fig. 2). This may be the company united in industrial complexes, and a set of different production stages, trade and bank networks, and others.

xi, i = 1,…,5 – input and reduced variables;

OBJECT 3

 

OBJECT 1

 
 yi, i = 1,…,8 – input variables;

OBJECT 5

 

OBJECT 4

 

OBJECT 2

 
ξ, h – random noise with zero mathematical expectation and bounded variance influencing objects and measurement channels

 

Ðèñ. 2. Conditional block diagram of the multiply connected object

As we can see in Fig. 2, feedbacks lead to the fact that some of the vector components of the output depends on other its components, and the investigated class of objects is described not in the traditional form of «input - operator - out», but in the form of equations system that determines the appropriate implicit functions. The complex nature of internal correlations leads us  to the concept of compound vectors, i.e. vectors composed of some components of the corresponding vectors of input and output variables [3]. For example, for an object 1 in Fig. 2 compound vectors are  and .

Let's formulate the problem. Let for a multidimensional static object influenced by uncontrolled disturbances with random errors having zero mathematical expectation and limited dispersion, the following observations {X[t], Y[t]}, t=1,2,...,N of the state vector {X, Y} may be conducted. The  probability density p(X), p(Y) are unknown. It is known that the variables {X, Y} on the object are connected by some relations, some of which are known exactly (on the basis of the fundamental laws)

,others are known with accuracy to the parameter set
 
, and some ones due to the lack of a priori information about the structure cannot be parameterized and presented as high-quality ratios of input - output.

Then, having an observation sample {X[t], Y[t]}, t=1,2,...,N, we need to find such a value of the output, corresponding to a given input impact - that is, to make the forecast of the system output according to a given input impact.

Let’s present a model of the system in the form [3]

                          (1)

where

         (2)

- nonparametric estimation of quality dependencies according to the observations of the state vector of the object;  - an equations found on the basis of the known fundamental laws; - parameterized components of the corresponding vector functions; X(j), Y(j) -vectors composed of various components of the corresponding vectors of input and output variables used in the description of the preferred correlations [2], Φ(.)  - bell-shaped function, parameters of fuzziness C satisfies conditions of convergence [3].

Undoubtedly, the offered Ê-models have a complex enough form (1), but reflect more accurately properties of the run process in this or that object. They are fundamentally different from the well-known models that combine equations, obtained on the basis of the fundamental laws, technical, constructive peculiarities of the process and its parametric and non-parametric components as a whole.

     The model simplification of the discrete-continuous process will inevitably lead to a deterioration of its quality, and it is possible that the simplified model, in contrast to the models of the type (1), are not suitable for the production of high-quality forecast systems of automatic control because of its roughness.
Note that we do not belittle the value of the classical models: they work well in situations in which it is foreseen to their applicability. The application of 
Ê-models are not available for the of the many processes description, say, for  mechanical or electrical ones, such as electrical machinery, turbines, reactors and generators as they are controlled well enough and required classical models. In reality, however, we have to face situations when it is unable to receive such models for control required for the adequate application. We want to emphasize that, in fact, a Ê-model is not uncommon and it is not fiction, they are applied in a wide variety of natural, technological, and social and economic processes, and that the application of the model of such a complex form is justified. As an example we consider the process of oil geofiltaring in a porous medium because of a spill from a pipeline.

Ê-models the oil pollution process of the porous medium. The human activity associated with the oil use as a primary source of energy, led to the pollution of the environment. The most serious soil pollution by petroleum products arises from various emergency situations. Withheld porous media hydrocarbons represent a serious problem for the environment due to their toxicity and the potential to serve as a long-current source of pollution. In this regard, the investigation of the filtration processes in the models of porous media, the most adequate to the natural conditions, is a topical issue, which will allow receiving the forecast of forming the front of pollution and estimate the   polluted zone.

The monitoring process is of considerable complexity, because at oil pollution interact three groups of factors to consider in assessing the effects of soil pollution with oil and oil products: multicomponent composition of oil; the heterogeneity of the composition and structure of soil ecosystems; the diversity and variability of the external factors [5]. Moreover a significant role in the formulation of modeling problems belongs to the control tools and technology of variables control; and the investigated geofiltaring process is unavailable to the direct investigated field (oil pollution). These difficulties lead to the fact that at the stage of problem formulation an investigator has to use the assumptions having little relation to reality.
Mathematical modeling is always accompanied by some assumptions that are useful from the practical point of view in making the problem solvable. The adopted assumptions in the general may be too «rough» and lead to the fact that the model will be inadequate the reality. The present paper presents an attempt to formulate the task of the modeling production process releasing some assumptions due to the lack of a priori information. It is offered to use a new type of mathematical models
Ê-models for this purpose:

Fig. 3. Scheme of the process geofiltaring in a porous medium

 

The input variables (analogues of X in the previously proposed problem formulation) are defined by the parameters of three interacting systems: soil (Q1), oil (Q2) and environment (Q3); at the output, the model produces the spatial oil (parameters Π and L, defining parameters of three-dimensional cylindrical surface) and the pollution level (α) (analogues of Y). Variables Π and L are different output variables, because they are determined by different physical processes, and have different measurement discreetness (a size of the spill is controlled quite often by the aerial, a depth of penetration is measured once by carrying out prospecting ensures after the fire season, during which the actively in the process of evaporation of light oil fractions from the soil surface). ξ(t) – vector random effects. - variables of the process (saturation, filtration rate, depth of oil pollution), determined by the model based on the equation of continuity and  Darcy’s law [5] and the additional information about the process; H – communication channels corresponding to different variables, which include control measurement tools of the observed variables; Q1t, Q2t, Q3t, Dt, Ït, Lt, αt - measurement of the corresponding variables in discrete time t; h(t) is random noise variables measurements of the process.
We also note the significant difference of output variables
Π(t), L(t) and α(t). The output variable Π(t) is controlled by time intervals Δt, for example, on the basis of aerial data; L(t) – through significantly large time intervals ΔT (by drilling holes by the accepted  technology),) α(t) - through T (T > ΔT>> Δt) (with the help of chemical analysis of soil samples by the obtained pitting [1]). The variables control α(t) for the investigated process is often the most important from the  practical point of view [1]. Despite the fact that the process of geofiltaring is dynamic, the existing  control tools were forced to consider as a static delay, however the choice of this models class does not contradict the modeling objectives because the simulation result has practical value at the time when the transition process is over and passed in the established mode.

Thus, the geofiltaring model suggested to be built on the basis of physical laws, equations of the two-phase filtration theory [5] (fundamental dependencies), methodologies of the main parameters calculation applied by services of ecological safety [1], and the information about the phenomenon under consideration obtained in earlier studies [5] (parameterized dependencies) but also the qualitative information that can currently be presented parametrically due to the  lack of information about the form of the relationship (non-parameterized dependencies), that leads to Ê-models.

Conclusion. The paper presents a new type of models of a complex stochastic process, combining the equations obtained on the basis of the fundamental laws, technical, constructive peculiarities of the process and its parametric, and non-parametric components as a unit. The presented models are fundamentally different from those ones used in identification. The simulation problem formulation  is carried out in conditions close to real conditions of the similar processes, depending on the available a priori information. For example, the process of oil geofilaring in a porous medium shows the real necessity for the proposed models application for the complex processes description, as proposed models make it possible to depart from a number of assumptions on the stage of problems formulation and to get the forecasted values of the  interested process variables in the information situation, which is really  observed for such a process.

 

References

1. Zagvozdkin V. K., Zaikin I. A., Bikov A. A., Makiev U. D., Makishev D. V., Nazarov V. B. Metodika ocenki jekologo-jekonomicheskih posledstvij zagrjaznenija zemel' neft'ju i nefteproduktami // Problemy analiza riska.– Moscow, 2005. – Vol. 1(2), pp. 6–28.

2. Maltseva T. V., Medvedev A. V. O komp'juternom issledovanii K-modelej // Krasnoyarsk, 2013. – Vol. 3 (49).

3. Medvedev A. V. Teorija neparametricheskih sistem. Modelirovanie //Krasnoyarsk, 2010. – Vol. 4., pp. 4–9.

4. Medvedev A. V. Computer Modeling of Active Processes // Modern Scientific Research and Their Practical Application. – Ukraine, 2013. – Vol. J11307.

5. Molokova N. V., Konnykh M. A. Modeling of the Dynamics of Spreading of Spilled Hydrocarbons Taking into Account the Gravity-Capillary Interaction // Krasnoyarsk: SFU, 2012. – Vol. 5(4), pp. 462–470.