Danabayeva Rauan
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Santiago de Compostela University,
Phd student
Shedenov Utegaly
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, doctor of economy sciences
Sustainable
innovation strategies
Today there is a
predominant strategy based on competitiveness and
sustainability which is shared by nations, international organisms and
companies throughout the world. That is, there is a shared understanding that
today’s society is immersed in a complex globalization process, growing and
uneven, and is therefore facing a time of great challenges and opportunities
that need to be tackled, at least in part, through placing innovation and
sustainability at the center of the agenda. This means that competitiveness is
no longer the sole driving factor of the world economy. Competition must be
accompanied by being responsible, by pursuing sustainable development and
minimizing potential negative impacts of our actions, through innovating
products and services, processes and models.
Innovation is
certainly a key competitiveness factor for firms as it can help to
significantly increase performance by improving products and services,
processes, business models and marketing strategies. It is, however, unclear
how to measure it. This is why it is very important to take a broad perspective
on innovation and not see it solely as a linear process based on an investment,
a R&D activity and an output or return on the original investment.
Thus, focusing on
sustainability and innovation as two central factors to achieve a competitive
advantage in the long run has also become central to private firms throughout
the world. For instance, in June of 2010, Accenture presented the results of a
survey conducted on over 750 CEOs worldwide which concluded, among other
things, that 93% of CEOs see sustainability as a key competitiveness factor for
their firm, that 91% understand will be a key factor in developing
sustainability in the coming years, and that 96% assume that sustainability in
the future will be fully integrated into their firm’s operations and strategies
[1]. So, we are in a context of uncertainty that is being faced by nations,
regions and companies alike, at least in part, through sustainable innovation
strategies.
Different
companies use different terminologies when referring to social and
environmental policies, such as Responsibility, Corporate Social Responsibility
(or CSR), Sustainability, Compliance, Accountability, Corporate Citizenship, or
Business in the Community to a name a few. Furthermore, some companies use
these terms as synonymous, others define their policies under a single terms
and place the others as sub-categories, yet others invent their own terms. In
many cases, when companies talk about sustainability they refer to
environmental policies, while when they talk about CSR, they focus on social
issues.
As we can see in
Figure 1, we can understand that there
is a central goal, which is sustainable development, and that regardless of the
terminology, the private sector suggests an approach to contribute to this
common goal .
Figure 1. The Sustainable development organizational
framework [2].
0
Sustainability in
corporate setting is often understood as the voluntary integration of social,
environmental and economic concerns in business operations and stakeholder
relations. The problem with this definition is that no widely accepted
integrated framework exists to clarify which are the social and environmental
concerns, how a company can integrate them in its operations and relationship
with its stakeholders and, most importantly, how this can be carried out from a
strategic perspective.
Many initiatives
have appeared in the last few years to try to solve this problem by proposing
some sort of framework on sustainability. However, as in the case of
innovation, these initiatives use different nomenclatures, classifications and
definitions. Generating confusion rather than helping to clarify the issue.
Nevertheless, sustainability seems to focus on central aspects such as
corporate vision, community relations; workplace policies, accountability, and
incorporating sustainability in products and services, particularly in terms of
research and development and innovation. At the center of the debate on
innovation as a linear versus a dynamic, complex and unpredictable process in
the question of what drives innovation. Ultimately, innovation has been
generally about generating profits for the firm, while today there seems to be
a tendency to understand innovation as the effective application of new
processes and products designed to benefit the company as well as its
stakeholders [3].
The innovation
drivers are very important because there is some evidence that the manner in
which the firm innovates determines what the firm innovates. In other words, a
firm that uses exploration throughout its ranks understands that the basic unit
of innovation is no a department, but rather a network which aims to generate
public and private good. As Prahalad
and Rangaswami proposed in 2009, ‘we find that smart companies now treat
sustainability as innovation’s new frontier’.
References
1. Accenture 2010 Global Consumer
Research executive summary.
2. Mascarenhas, B. 2009. The
emerging CEO agenda. Journal of International Management.
3.Ram Nidumolu, C.K.Prahald,
M.R.Rangaswami 2009. Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation,
Harvard business review.