Филологические науки / 9. Этно-, социо- и психолингвистика

Morel Morel D.A., candidate of philology

Melnkova O.V.

National Research University “BelSU”, Russia

Drinks in the senior pupils’ picture of the world: towards problem statement

 

The present paper is within the scope of the research the authors have been carrying out to reveal national peculiarities of the universal concept “Drinks” (see for example [3]).

Here we are to specialize our subject confining ourselves to the study of this concept featuring in the Russian teenagers’ picture of the world.

This group picture existing within the national one is somewhat distinguishing due to the specificity of this age when many stereotypes including gender ones, that will impact social behavior at a mature age, are forming and consolidating (for details see [2]). The latter circumstance makes for dramatic movements in the teenagers’ picture of the world within this age limits.

Studying senior pupils’ age group has a special social significance because of this period’s importance in virtue of its borderline—and somewhat existential—character. This short period usually indicated by the transition from high school to higher one serves as an edge symbolically separating childhood from adulthood. Therefore it is very important to know the features of consciousness matured by that time.

We have elaborated the research program of complex studying the whole system of verbal means representing the concept “Drinks” in the contemporary Russians’ linguistic picture of the world (see [1]). Such a study involves collection, processing, analyze, clusterization of materials, interpretation and modeling of derived results concerning the following aspects of the concept in question and of its representation means:

– nominative field;

– interpretational field [4: 63-64] (including any kinds of utterances—proverbs, sayings, aphorisms, precedential phrases, etc.—or even their discoursive series—parables, anecdotes, written texts [ibid.: 130]);

– associative field;

– ways of categorization;

– ways of defining descriptor;

– prototypes and stereotypes (national, age, and gender specific ones);

– axiological concept constituent (representing personal systems of values, likes and dislikes);

– praxiological concept constituent (representing personal practical experience);

– regulative concept constituent (representing personal and national behavior regulations and social prescriptions, “unwritten law”).

The “pilot” survey of two groups of Russian senior pupils—14-15 and 16-17 years old (the 9th and 11th graduation classes, respectively)—lets us reveal several important points for the further, more thorough examination:

1) formation of gender specifics in the age groups’ systems of verbal means representing the concept;

2) considerable share of references to alcoholic drinks in the linguistic picture of the world regardless the age nor gender;

3) tendency to drift away from traditional regulations, to mock them with age;

4) stable attitude to vodka as the national stereotype regardless the age nor gender.

Thus if we are concerning manifestations of gender specifics in the fragment in question of the senior pupils’ picture of the world we have to state the following. The models of nominative and interpretational fields established for the younger group of respondents (see Fig. 1) are quasi gender balanced, slightly gender differentiated meanwhile the senior group’s system of verbal means representing the concept “Drinks” becomes gender asymmetric at different tiers.

 

Fig. 1. Models of the nominative (left) and interpretational (right) fields of the concept “Drinks”: the younger group of respondents (14-15 years old)

 

In the diagrams above light sectors refer to female gender specific verbal reactions, dark sectors refer to male ones, horizontal hatching denotes common, gender undifferentiated reactions, vertical hatching marks verbal means related to alcoholic drinks.

If we try to reveal the role of alcoholic drinks in the senior pupils’ picture of the world it turns out that they are of considerable importance. Thus alcoholic drinks denominations (types) are quite numerous and frequent (tokens) in all gender subgroups’ systems of drinks denominations (see Table 1) but it is hard to draw up any trend in the age depending dynamics (cf. Table 2) by virtue of minor sample.

Table 1

Percentage of alcoholic drinks denominations

 

14-15 years old

16-17 years old

fem.

masc.

fem.

masc.

types

tokens

types

tokens

types

tokens

types

tokens

Strong liquors

10,4

9,8

15,6

14,3

15,1

11,8

23,7

23,4

Wines

7,3

9,8

4,4

6,6

8,1

8,3

7,9

7,8

Beers

4,2

5,9

12,2

8,7

1,2

3,9

2,6

4,7

Cocktails

5,2

5,9

6,7

4,6

2,3

3,1

2,6

1,6

Misc.

4,2

3,5

3,3

1,5

2,3

1,2

2,6

1,6

Total:

31,3

34,9

42,2

35,7

29,1

28,3

39,5

39,1

 

Table 2

Percentage of alcoholic drinks denominations

(19-20 years old respondents)

 

fem.

masc.

types

tokens

types

tokens

Strong liquors

13,1

17,1

15,3

21,1

Wines

7,8

12,1

5,6

9,1

Beers

1,3

3,2

11,9

8,1

Cocktails

3,9

1,9

6,2

2,5

Misc.

2,0

1,2

6,2

3,5

Total:

28,1

35,4

45,2

44,3

 

The most frequent alcoholic drinks denominations are—

 14-15, fem.: ‘водка’, ‘пиво’ (4,31% each; II), ‘шампанское’ (3,53%; IV), ‘вино’ (3,14%; V);

 14-15, masc.: ‘водка’, ‘пиво’ (3,57% each; IV), ‘вино’ (2,55%; VI);

 16-17, fem.: ‘пиво’ (3,94%; V), ‘вино’ (3,15%; VII), ‘шампанское’ (2,76%; VIII);

 16-17, masc.: ‘водка’, ‘пиво’, ‘вино’, ‘коньяк’ (4,69% each; II), ‘виски’, ‘ликер’ (3,13% each; III).

Figures above in Arabic numerals stand for a share in the gender subgroups’ answers; figures in Roman numerals refer to the frequency range of the denomination in the given field.

The situation turns out to be quite similar while considering senior pupils’ associative fields (see Table 3). There we can find out two kinds of associations referring to the concept “Drinks”: denominations of alcoholic drinks and their classes (see Denominations) and associations referring to different aspects of alcohol consumption (see References): psychophysiological states attending alcohol consumption (‘опьянение’, ‘головная боль’, ‘похмелье’ etc.), establishments providing alcoholic drinks (‘бар’, ‘винный супермаркет’, ‘дьюти-фри’ etc.), social drinking and concomitant (‘драка’). All the representatives of the latter group of associations are single, thereby having the minimal frequency (1).

Table 3

Percentage of references to alcoholic drinks in the associative fields

 

14-15 years old

16-17 years old

fem.

masc.

fem.

masc.

types

tokens

types

tokens

types

tokens

types

tokens

Denominations

22,2

16,9

17,6

15,2

10,3

12,6

21,6

20,8

References

1,4

0,7

8,1

5,4

3,4

2,3

16,2

12,5

Total:

23,6

17,6

25,7

20,6

13,7

14,9

37,8

33,3

 

We can see that the total shares of references to alcoholic drinks are rather considerable in all subgroups’ associative fields but not as big as in the corresponding nominative ones. As in the latter case it is hard to draw up any trend in the age depending dynamics (cf. Table 4) by virtue of minor sample but it is evident that in any age the share of alcohol mentioning is noticeably bigger in male respondent answers than in female ones.

Table 4

Percentage of references to alcoholic drinks in the associative field

(19-20 years old respondents)

 

fem.

masc.

types

tokens

types

tokens

Denominations

15,2

14,5

13,7

19,5

References

5,8

2,8

12,6

7,6

Total:

21

17,3

26,3

27,1

 

The most frequent associations referring to alcoholic drinks are quite similar—

 14-15, fem.: ‘алкоголь’ (3,38%; IV);

 14-15, masc.: ‘алкоголь’ (2,68%; IV);

 16-17, fem.: ‘алкоголь’, ‘алкогольные’ (2,29% each; IV);

 16-17, masc.: ‘алкоголь’, ‘пиво’ (4,17% each; II).

Compare with

 19-20, fem.: ‘алкоголь’ (2,1%; IX);

 19-20, masc.: ‘пиво’(3,81%; IV), ‘водка’ (3,14%; V);

Figures above in Arabic numerals stand for a share in the gender subgroups’ answers; figures in Roman numerals refer to the frequency range of the denomination in the given field.

Another important way to objectivize the concept “Drink” to be considered here is its representational field consisting of sayings with different structure, nature and origin. Like in the associative field there are two kinds of sayings referring to the concept “Drinks”: the ones including denominations of alcoholic drinks and the others referring to different aspects of alcohol consumption.

The first group representatives are—

 proverbs: «истина в вине» («in vino veritas»); «без чашки бражки гость гложи кость»;

 antiproverbs: «сколько водки не бери, всё равно два раза бегать»; «100 грамм водки убивают лошадь»;

 precedential sayings (quotations from different sources): «и я там был, мёд-пиво пил, по усам текло, в рот не попало»; «губит людей не пиво, губит людей вода»; «лучше водки хуже нет»;

 respondents private opinion: «Ягуар – делает дырки в животе».

The second group is represented by the following types of sayings:

 proverbs: «пей – не упивайся, ешь – не объедайся»;

 antiproverbs: «между первой и второй перерывчик (промежуток) небольшой»; «после первой не закусывают»;

 antiproverbial-like transforms: «Не надо печалиться, вся жизнь впереди! Вся жизнь впереди!.. Напейся и жги!»;

 toasts: «второй <тост> за родителей»; «третий тост за любовь»; «Во все года, во все века четвертый тост за мужика. И хоть ты царь, и хоть ты бог, ты все равно у наших ног»; «пятый тост за тех, кого с нами нет»; «пей до дна!»;

 idioms: «на посошок».

The percentage of both groups representatives in the age interpretational fields (to compare with seniors’ rates) are adduced in Table 5.

Table 5

Percentage of references to alcoholic drinks in the interpretational fields

 

14-15

16-17

19-20

sayings

tokens

sayings

tokens

sayings

tokens

Denominations

15,8

23,7

14,3

30

26,8

32,4

References

11,7

25

21,4

20

35,1

31,2

Total:

27,5

48,7

35,7

50

61,9

63,6

 

The most frequent representatives of the interpretational field in question that refer to alcohol drink(ing) are «между первой и второй перерывчик небольшой» (the 2nd rate in 14-15 years old respondents’ answers; 10% of tokens), and «истина в вине» (the 1st rate in 16-17 years old respondents’ answers; 25% of tokens).

 

In conclusion it should be noted that the problem points revealed above are relevant not only to linguistics but also to psychology, sociology, anthropology as well as to their crossovers, and demand further advanced, interdisciplinary study.

 

References

1. Морель Морель, Д. А. Напитки в картине мира российских подростков [Текст] / Д. А. Морель Морель, Л. Б. Кузнецова, Д. В. Русалева // Современные исследования социальных проблем. – 2011. – № 1. – С. 187–191.

2. Морель Морель, Д. А. Некоторые гендерные особенности вербализации концепта «напитки» в старшем подростковом возрасте [Электронный ресурс] / Д. А. Морель Морель, Л. Б. Кузнецова // Современные исследования социальных проблем. – 2011. – № 3. – Режим доступа : http://sisp.nkras.ru/issues/2011/3/morel.pdf.

3. Морель Морель, Д. А. Структурирование и динамика концепта «Алкогольные напитки»: сопоставительный аспект исследования [Электронный ресурс] / Д. А. Морель Морель, Ю. А. Пургина, О. В. Мельникова // Мат. межрег. науч.-практ. конф. «Динамика языковой картины мира». – Воронеж : АНО МОК ВЭПИ, 2009. – Ч. 1. – С. 25–38. – Режим доступа к изд. : http://vepi.ru/science/materials.

4. Попова, З. Д. Очерки по когнитивной лингвистике [Текст] / З. Д. Попова, И. А. Стернин. – Воронеж : Истоки, 2001. – 191 с.