Ôèëîëîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè/5.Ìåòîäû è ïðèåìû êîíòðîëÿ óðîâíÿ
âëàäåíèÿ èíîñòðàííûì ÿçûêîì.
PhD Konyaeva L.A
Kemerovo State University,
Russia
Interactive
foreign language teaching and
learning
Language
teaching came into its own as a profession in the last century. The emergence
of the concept of methods of
language teaching was central to this process. The method concept in language
teaching—the notion of a systematic set of teaching practices based on a particular theory of language and language
learning—is a powerful one, and the quest for better methods preoccupied
teachers and applied linguists throughout the 20th century. Foreign language learning is basically a process of
mechanical habit formation. Good habits are formed by giving correct
responses, by memorising dialogues and performing pattern drills, the chances
of producing mistakes are minimised. Language is verbal behaviour that is the automatic production and
comprehension of utterances and can be learned by inducing students to do
likewise. Language skills are learned more effectively if the items to be learned in the
target language are presented in spoken form before they are seen in written
form. Explanation of rules is
not given until students have practised a pattern in a variety of
contexts. Drills can enable learners to form correct analogies.
The concept of interaction is presumed to be fundamental for the
development of communicative methods of foreign language teaching. It is widely
recognized that communication, which proves to be an indispensible part of
language learning, is realized more successfully in the contexts of interactive
classes. So, interaction can be defined as a tool used to organize
communication between the learners. A more or less classical formulation of methodology suggests that it
links theory and practice. Within methodology a distinction is often made
between methods and approaches, in which methods are held to be fixed teaching
systems with prescribed techniques and practices, and approaches are language
teaching philosophies that can be interpreted and applied in a variety of
different ways in the classroom [4].
Teaching
a language involves teaching aspects of the cultural system of the target
language. According to R. Allwright, interaction may be understood
as the social nature of school pedagogics [1, p.18]. What is more, interaction
is necessarily involved into the social behavior, and, therefore, into the
nature of the processes of teaching and learning. Furthermore, interaction requires
a simultaneous participation on the part of learners and a teacher in the
process of education. One of the teachers’ major concerns while planning a
lesson is how to create comfortable and favorable conditions for students’
interaction.
The approach to the teaching of grammar is inductive rather than
deductive.The meanings of the words are learned only in word clusters, the
linguistic and cultural context are not in isolation.
Short range objectives include training in
listening comprehension, accurate pronunciation, recognition of speech symbols
as graphic signs, and ability to produce these symbols in writing. Long range
objectives must be the language as the native speaker uses it. Analogy supplemented by
analysis provides a better foundation for learning.
Learners and teachers play different roles. Learners play a reactive role by responding to stimuli; they are
learning a new form of verbal communicative behaviour; are encouraged to initiate interaction. Teacher
models the language; controls the direction and pace of leaning
and corrects the learner’s performance; êeeps the learner’s attentiveness by varying the teaching
styles, drills and tasks and choosing relative situations to practise structures.
The team-teaching approach
allows for more interaction between teachers and students. Faculty evaluates
students on their achievement of the learning goals; students evaluate faculty
members on their teaching proficiency. Emphasis is on student and faculty
growth, balancing initiative and shared responsibility, specialization and
broadening horizons, the clear and interesting presentation of content and
student development, democratic participation and common expectations, and
cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes. This combination of analysis,
synthesis, critical thinking, and practical applications can be done on all
levels of education, from kindergarten through graduate school.
Working as a team, teaches model
respect for differences, interdependence, conflict-resolution skills and
personal responsibility. Team members together set the course goals and
content, select common materials such as texts, newspaper articles and films,
and develop tests and final examinations for all students. They set the
sequence of topics and supplemental materials. They also give their own
interpretations of the materials and use their own teaching styles. The greater
the agreement on common objectives and interests, the more likely that teaching
will be interdependent and coordinated [2].
To conclude, consideration of the aspects mentioned above every time while
a teacher is planning a lesson may facilitate a team’s work organization and
greatly improve the quality of the target material acquisition. Deciding upon
which method to implement the teacher should consider a lot of impinging
factors. Research suggests that the best approach is principled
eclecticism. This is not a method in
itself but the use of different methods and/or different techniques depending
on factors such as learner’s age and needs; the goals and objective set, the
available materials, and the teacher’s views about what learning and teaching
encompasses.
Literature:
1. Allwright R.
L. The importance of interaction in Classroom Language Learning / R.L. Allwright // Applied Linguistics. – ¹ 5/2.
– 1984. – P. 156 – 171.
2. Jones L. The student-centered
classroom / Leo Jones. – Cambridge University Press, - 2007. – 41 p.
3. Richards J. C. Professional Development for
Language Teachers: Strategies for Teacher Learning. -
Cambridge University Press. -
2005. – P. 202
4. Rodgers T. S.
Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching/ T.S. Rodgers /Cambridge Language Teaching Library, Washington, DC. – 2001. – P. 278
5. ECRIF: Seeing Learning – Overview - [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.ecrif.com/