Ôèëîëîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè/1. Ìåòîäèêà ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ ÿçûêà è ëèòåðàòóðû
Ðÿáóõà Ò. Â.
Ìåëèòîïîëüñêèé
ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèé óíèâåðñèòåò
èìåíè Áîãäàíà Õìåëüíèöêîãî
The internet
as a source of information
in English
Language Teaching
The internet is probably one of the richest sources of
information which is readily available just a search or two away. One can find
practically any information in online encyclopedias, dictionaries, articles,
blogs, news archives, online versions of newspapers, journals and virtual
libraries.
However, this availability means that the
information comes from all sorts of sources and needs to be thoroughly checked
before using it in the classroom.
First of all, if you decide to use a website for teaching,
it needs to be checked for credibility. Normally, there is a big
difference in the degree of credibility between an article on language written,
say, by the world-renown expert David Crystal and the views of a tourist
expressed in a travel blog. Some information can be biased depending on the
views of the owner of the site. Thus, some websites are used to promote the
views of a religious, or a financial or a political group and therefore may not
be acceptable for teaching children. To find out who the owner of a website is
you may look for copyright notices at the bottom of the page or the owner's
contact information.
Even when the information on a website is edited
publicly, there are chances that its credibility is not so well-established.
Wikipedia — the publicly-edited online encyclopedia — can be used as a good
example of this statement. Since the information in Wikipedia can be edited by
any of its readers who wish to do so, every article can undergo minor changes
at any time. Although research shows that most of the information in Wikipedia
is fairly accurate, in some articles not only the details are different, but
also the attitude to those details is influenced by the attitudes of those who
wrote and edited those articles. Therefore it is always a good idea to check this
information in other sources like Encyclopedia Britannica or others.
Reliability is another issue
to look for in information from the internet. Even though the source of information
itself is credible, the information may not be very reliable simply due to the
fact that it is outdated. For example, if the information on a website has not
been updated for 3-5 years, it may already be too old to be reliable. So
looking for the date of the last update to the website is always a good idea.
Apart from checking a website's credibility and reliability,
the information needs to be selected according to how suitable it is for the
class on conceptual, linguistic and pedagogical levels. If the
information is too complex for the students to understand the ideas, it would
hardly be suitable to use in class unless some preliminary work is done by the
teacher. Likewise, a piece of information can be too difficult linguistically
for the students to understand, or, although seemingly interesting, will not
add much to the flow and the overall objectives of the lesson.
Still, even if some piece of information is too
difficult conceptually and language-wise but can be useful for reaching the
objectives of the lesson, there are some techniques that a teacher can use to
easify work with this information.
Here are some differences in arranging classroom work
with information when it is printed out from a website and in working with
information online. In the following table possible ways of overcoming the
conceptual, linguistic and pedagogical difficulties of information from
websites are enlisted:
|
Issues |
Work with printouts |
Online work |
|
Conceptual
difficulty |
Using
pre- teaching, explanation of concepts before starting work with the texts,
using warming-up to relate the ideas from the texts to the students' personal
experience and interests. |
Using
pre-teaching, explanation of concepts before starting work with the texts,
using warming-up to relate the ideas from the texts to the students' personal
experience and interests, providing links to online encyclopaedias. |
|
Linguistic
difficulty |
Breaking
the text into smaller chunks, numbering paragraphs and designing tasks and
exercises for each paragraph, designing tasks for different types of reading,
using a glossary to help students understand difficult words without having
to learn them by heart. |
Providing
links to online dictionaries and encyclopedias, asking questions on certain
bits of information from the webpage, illustrating new words by providing
links to pictures online, assisting students with internet search. |
|
Pedagogical
difficulty |
Presenting
the information as a fun activity, something which is interesting to learn
about even if not directly related to students' personal goals, using the
information to arrange a reading for pleasure activity or as a time-filler,
focusing on ways of organising information inside the text rather than
working with detailed understanding of information from the text. |
The
goals of the lesson shift from working with information to understand it and
pick up new vocabulary and grammar as well as ideas to working with the
internet as a source of information, for example: "On this webpage you
will find information about… Find additional information to complete the
table on the handouts" — an exercise based on information gap may help
students to build information literacy and help us in our further work with
the internet. |
So, as we see, the methodology of working with online
information versus printouts is slightly different, although essentially it
serves the same purpose and alongside with the main work on building language
proficiency, allows us to develop students' information skills.