Ñåëüñêîå õîçÿéñòâî/3. Çåìëåäåëèå,
ãðóíòîâåäåíèå è àãðîõèìèÿ.
N.V. Kozlova
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution
“Russian Research Institute of Floriculture and Subtropical Crops”, c.
Sochi, Russia, e-mail: agro-pochva@vniisubtrop.ru.
Macronutrient
composition in vine components and nutrients consumption during the cultivation
of Actinidia
deliciosa in Russian subtropics
The
paper studies peculiarities of chemical composition in Actinidia deliciosa (Hayward cv.) and presents average
removal of major nutrients during crop formation. Also, it determines the
average economic and biological macronutrient removal in fruit-bearing plants.
The annual economic removal of nutrients, which requires compensation by
fertilizers, makes up on average (g/plant): N – 105, P2O5
– 35, K2O – 160. The paper includes fertilizers norms appropriate
for application, and recommended during the cultivation of Actinidia deliciosa (Hayward cv.) in Russian subtropics,
based on the economic removal of the main nutrients and non-deficit balance. It
is shown that since there are no significant varietal differences in the
macronutrient composition, these norms can be applied to other cultivars
(Bruno, Monty Abbott, Allison), taking into account the removal of a certain
cultivar.
Key
words:
Actinidia deliciosa, chemical
composition, macronutrients, economic removal of nutrients, varietal
characteristics, fertilizer doses.
Actinidia deliciosa is one of the newest and most promising subtropical fruit crops for
Russian subtropics, where climatic conditions suggest that it can be cultivated
successfully not only in the amateur gardening, but also on an industrial
scale. The first commercial plantation was established on the Adler
experimental station (Sochi, Adler district) in 1988. There is a positive
experience of cultivation in other farms, including farms and orchards, located
in different areas on the Black Sea coast of the Krasnodar region and Abkhazia.
The total area of plantations is not large - about 40 hectares [9]. Average
long-term productivity of the most common cvs. is 20-40 kg/plant (100 - 160
kg/ha): for the early ripening cvs. (Abbott
and Allison) - 20-25 kg/plant (94 and
105 kg/ha, respectively); for middle ripening cvs. (Bruno and Monti) - 30-40
kg/plant (152 and 163 kg/ha, respectively); for late ripening cvs. (Hayward
group) - 22-27 kg/plant (111 kg/ha - for Hayward cv.) [2]. The study of Actinidia
deliciosa chemical composition, together with its needs, absorption
and yield of biogenic elements during fruit formation is of a great interest in
terms of defining mineral fertilizer norms, considering the requirements of
crops and soil-climatic conditions in Russian subtropics.
The
most of field and laboratory studies was conducted for Actinidia deliciosa (Hayward
cv., planted in 1996) in one of Sochi farms (LLC "Verlioka", v.
‘Yakornaya chshel’). The study was conducted on the basis of field experience
with fertilizers, carried out in 2007. Experimental options included 7
different combinations of NPK doses in the ranges: N 0-250-375-500, P 0-125,
and K 0-375-500-625 g of active substance/plant with a 3-fold repetition (5-7
plants). In the pilot area of Adler Experiment Station we studied varietal
characteristics of the chemical composition in certain cvs. (Hayward, Allison Abbott, Monty, Bruno),
along with the annual fertilizer application of N 180-220, P 180-220, and K
180-220 g of active substance/plant. Alluvial slightly loamy well-drained soils
and potting soils on their basis with middle and high humus content, slightly
acid or close to neutral reaction, as well as with average saturation by
nitrogen, high and very high saturation by phosphorus and potassium provided
favorable soil conditions to cultivate crops that meet their basic
requirements.
Chemical
analysis of the plants was carried out by wet ashing method (in sulfuric acid
with the addition of hydrochloric acid) [4, 5], followed by determination of
nitrogen and phosphorus - calorimetrically; potassium - flame photometrically.
The experimental data was carried out by methods of descriptive statistics in
the program Microsoft Excel.
While
determining the amount of accumulation and removal of the main nutrition
elements in Actinidia
deliciosa (Hayward cv.), we used data on vines macronutrient
composition selected during fruit ripening (Table 1) [5]. The accumulation of
minerals in the plant achieved during this period corresponds to the concept of
"plant requirements" and allows us to evaluate their removal
arbitrarily, and therefore their need for fertilizers [1]. In order to
characterize the composition of fruits and leaves, we used averaged data of the
experiment with fertilizers. The data on the chemical composition in other
plant parts (roots, monocyclic shoots, branches of various orders, and so on)
were obtained for a model plant – which was normally developed and typical for
plantation (by habit). The calculations took into account approximate weight of
vine components and total biomass (established for the model plant), as well as
the average yield (30 kg/plant), obtained in the experiment with fertilizers.
The
studies have shown that potassium predominates in fruit composition; as for the
leaves, both nitrogen and potassium were high there. Young growing plant parts
(annual and perennial shoots, small and medium-sized roots) contain more NPK,
than the old ones (skeletal branches, large roots). From the studied
macronutrients, potassium is most expropriated by Actinidia deliciosa, because
it removal by fruits represents the major part of economic removal, requiring
compensation with fertilization (Table 1). This is common for all fruit and
berry crops, so in their fertilizer system one should give great importance to potassium.
Table
1 - The average content of major macronutrients in different parts and total
plant biomass of Actinidia deliciosa (Hayward cv.) during fruit ripening.
|
Plant parts |
N |
P2O5 |
K2O |
N |
P2O5 |
K2O |
|
|
% from
dry mass |
g/plant |
||||||
|
Fruits* |
1,16 |
0,35 |
2,81 |
53 |
16 |
127 |
|
|
Leaves |
1,90 |
0,68 |
2,30 |
55 |
20 |
67 |
|
|
Trunk |
0,68 |
0,32 |
0,42 |
135 |
64 |
83 |
|
|
Branches |
Skeletal |
0,68 |
0,32 |
0,42 |
45 |
21 |
28 |
|
1-2-order |
0,83 |
0,30 |
0,47 |
17 |
6 |
10 |
|
|
3-4-order |
1,59 |
0,36 |
0,60 |
49 |
12 |
19 |
|
|
annual shoots |
1,00 |
0,31 |
0,69 |
30 |
9 |
21 |
|
|
Roots |
large |
0,83 |
0,36 |
0,95 |
31 |
14 |
22 |
|
medium |
1,75 |
0,94 |
1,55 |
37 |
20 |
14 |
|
|
small |
1,28 |
1,08 |
2,28 |
15 |
13 |
15 |
|
|
Total number fixed in one plant, g/plant |
467 |
195 |
406 |
||||
|
The number fixed in plant biomass from the plantations (500 plants per
1 hectare), kg/ha |
233,5 |
97,5 |
203,0 |
||||
|
Biological removal ** g/plant The ratio of elements |
175 2,6 |
67 1 |
243 3,6 |
||||
|
Economical removal ** g/plant The ratio of elements |
105 3,1 |
35 1 |
160 5,5 |
||||
|
Removal by fruits, the share in economic removal, % |
50,5 |
45,7 |
78,8 |
||||
Note:
- the calculation is based on the yield of 30 kg/plant;
**
- annual, taking into account the share of the annual increment of biomass of
individual plant parts
Based
on the established volumes of economic removal of nutrients (by yield and
incidental output), we determined the norms of mineral fertilizers sufficient
for its compensation (Table 2) [6, 7]. The calculation was performed by the
simplified deficit-free balance, considering the income to the soil, as well as
utilization factor and potential loss of fertilizer nutrients, according to the
method of regulatory balance [1]. The correction ratios were determined
depending on the level of soil fertility, ranging from very high to low: N -
0,7-1,1; P - 0,7-1,8; K – 0,6-1,5 (respectively).
Table 2 - Basic norms of
mineral fertilizers in the cultivation
of Actinidia deliciosa in
Russian subtropics.
|
Average yield |
Norms of fertilizers |
||
|
N |
P2O5 |
K2O |
|
|
For one plant |
|||
|
kg/plant |
g a.s./plant |
||
|
20 |
220 |
110 |
170 |
|
30 |
270 |
130 |
240 |
|
40 |
310 |
150 |
300 |
|
For plantation |
|||
|
c/ha |
kg a.s./ha |
||
|
90 |
110 |
55 |
90 |
|
135 |
135 |
65 |
120 |
|
180 |
155 |
75 |
150 |
The
comparative study of the chemical composition in fruits (Hayward, Allison,
Abbot, Monty, Bruno) conducted in the same soil, hydrothermal and agronomic
conditions of cultivation (at the experimental station of Adler) showed no
significant varietal differences in their content of major nutrients (Table 2)
[8].
Table 3 - Chemical
composition of Actinidia deliciosa fruits in different cultivars
|
Cultivar |
Nutrients, % (average for 2011-2013) |
||
|
N |
P2O5 |
K2O |
|
|
Allison |
1,21 + 0,15 |
0,61 + 0,07 |
2,73 + 0,28 |
|
Abbot |
1,09 + 0,12 |
0,59 + 0,08 |
2,57 + 0,27 |
|
Monty |
1,04 + 0,11 |
0,56 + 0,07 |
2,72 + 0,20 |
|
Bruno |
1,11 + 0,13 |
0,58 + 0,08 |
2,87 + 0,32 |
|
Hayward |
1,03 + 0,09 |
0,52 + 0,08 |
2,50 + 0,18 |
This
suggests that the amounts of macronutrient removal in different cvs. are
comparable (within the same yield), making up the bulk of the economic removal
in this crop. The norms of mineral fertilizers (NPK), developed for Hayward
cv., with certain assumptions, can be applied for other cultivars cultivated in
subtropical regions of Russia, subject to certain doses of fertilizers and
adjustments based on the yield of the cv. and soil fertility in particular
plantation.
References
1.
Agrochemicals / Yagodyn B.Ya,
Smirnov P.M., Petersburgskiy A.V. and others; ed. B.Ya. Yagodin. - 2nd
edition.- M .: Agropromizdat, 1989. - 639 p.
2.
Besedina, T.D. Agro-environmental
requirements Actinidia deliciosa in Russian humid subtropics / T.D. Besedina,
TS.V. Tutberidze, S.V. Dobezhina // Subtropical and ornamental plants: coll.
sci.prs. - Sochi: State Research Institution Russian Research Institute of
Floriculture and Subtropical Crops of the Russian Academy of Agricultural
Sciences, 2012. - Vol. 46 - P. 123 - 133.
3.
Ginsburg, K.Ye. Rapid method of
burning soils and plants / K.Ye. Ginsburg, G.M. Shcheglova, Ye.V. Vulfius //
Soil science. - 1963. - ¹ 5. - P. 89-96. (A)
4.
Ginsburg K.E. Determination of
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in plant material from one sample. / K.Ye.
Ginsburg, Ye.V. Vulfius, G.M. Shcheglova // Soil science. - 1963. - ¹ 5. - P.
25-35. (B)
5.
Kozlova, N.V. Some features of
chemical composition Actinidia deliciosa in a subtropical Russia / NV Kozlov SN
Grebenyuk // Problems and prospects of horticulture in the subtropics of the
Caucasus region: Sat. scientific. tr. - Sochi: State Research Institution
Russian Research Institute of Floriculture and Subtropical Crops of the Russian
Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2011. - Vol. 44. - T. 1. - P. 172-180.
6.
Kozlova, N.V. Rationing doses of
fertilizers when growing Aktinidia deliciosa in Russian subtropics / N.V.
Kozlova, S.N. Grebenyukov // Scientific researches in Russian subtropics:
coll.prs. of young scientists, graduate students and applicants. - Sochi, State
Research Institution Russian Research Institute of Floriculture and Subtropical
Crops of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013. - P. 161-177.
7.
Kozlova, N.V. Fertilizers for
Actinidia deliciosa in Russian subtropics / N.V. Kozlova, S.N., Grebenyukov //
Horticulture and viticulture. - 2014. - ¹ 6. - P. 41-44.
8.
Kozlova N.V. Chemical composition of
Actinidia deliciosa fruits of varietal section / N.V. Kozlova, S.N.,
Grebenyukov //subtropical and ornamental plants: coll.sci.prs. - Sochi: State
Research Institution Russian Research Institute of Floriculture and Subtropical
Crops of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2015. - Vol. 53. - P.
165-174.
9.
Tutberidze TS.V. Biological
properties and economic evaluation of introduced cultivars of kiwi in Russian
subtropics: Author. Dis. ... Cand. Agr.Sci. / Tsiala Vdadimirovna Tutberidze. -
Krasnodar, 2005. - 24 p.