Philosophy/4. Philosophy of culture  

Afanasjeva T. Ju.

Belgorod State University

Postmodern epoch and culture: philosophical and conceptual senses.

              

The starting point in explaining the meaning of this complicated concept will be the statement that postmodernism – is a "world-view, expressing the main trends, installation and guidelines of the company, has reached a certain level of development".

Postmodernism as a complex ideological view represents the quintessence of the of time spirit, as it most adequately reflects the state of spirituality in our days, associated with a sense of inadmissibility in the new socio-cultural realities of lords earlier views o the world and the man . The main distinctive feature of post-modernism is considered to be a defining set on the impossibility to describe the world as of a certain whole with the help of any general theories, claiming to be the true, the only true knowledge o the reality.

Modern, Modernity (English modernity, from the Latin modernus - modern) - it is an integral characteristic of the European society and culture, today it is often used in philosophical and sociological concepts to indicate the stage of formation and evolution of the industrial society, coming to the place of the traditional . In the philosophical culture in the 20th century, the identification of common today with the approval and the triumph of scientific rationality of industrial society. The new time of the beginning of the transformation of the ancient idea of the objective of genesis: genesis has become subjective. IN the 20thcentury, this process has deepened and now even the absolute God became depend on the a priori internal installation of the man in search of absolute. And yet the New time has waived the ancient traditions of search of support for human existence. The Place of God took a human mind. Triumph rationalistic projects Renaissance and Enlightenment - two great epochs, expressing confidence reason and recognize his right to the law in all spheres of life.

Replaced by "the ontological nihilism" (M. Heidegger) came denial of mind and the intelligence of the human existence, which clearly manifested itself also in our country after the collapse of the Soviet Union ended the "parade of sovereignties" and senseless, violent inter-ethnic and sectarian wars and bloody strife. Rising awareness of the horror of meaninglessness, illogical as, the dullness of life became the fact of the present history of the country. It is in this sense we "fit" in western civilization.

The new time of the beginning of the transformation of the ancient idea of the objective of genesis: genesis has become subjective. IN the 20TH century, this process has deepened and now even the absolute God became depend on the a priori internal installation of the man in search of absolute.

The 20th century was marked by a crusade against reason, this meant a break with the ancient tradition. "Our apprenticeship with the greeks finished: the greeks are not classics, - stated in the beginning of the century Spanish philosopher-idealist Ortega-y-Gasset (1883-1955), they simply archaic - archaic and, of course... are always beautiful. They are especially interesting for us. They cease to be our teachers and become our friends. In the 20th century. People, as noted by E Giddens, trying to get away from the feeling of fear that accompanied the disappointment in the possibilities of reason be the backbone, which rules are created by human beings and they have also arbitrarily changed. Our age recommends that people will not be very serious, for no one knows how to live right, nobody has the right to dictate what life should be. All justified by the fact, that nothing in this world there is no forever. To live, but to know that in nothing there is no support, and no such values, which have as standards of truth and the measures being.

"Everything is permissible", "nothing is guaranteed" - the main pathos of the consciousness of post-modernism. All of the "sacred" and "high" are perceived as the result of the self-deception of the people, the hierarchy of the body - soul - spirit" long ago destroyed, a spirituality and feelings are perceived as signs of dementia and schizophrenia. More people doesn't believe in anything, he has "nothing" ones can a person recommended by not build illusions about gaining new values (for the former, as we have noted, have already been destroyed), a is easy to take life as it is, without trying to dictate what she should do.

The world of everyday life and everyday life becomes the main value and the main topic of philosophical reflection. In this world dominated by short-term interests of end-of empirical individuals, each of which considers itself the legislator their ethical, aesthetic, political and other ambitions. Goodness, Truth, and Beauty - the Absolute values pushed to the periphery of public and private life and consciousness . The main characteristic of a society and nature is declared uncertainty. Where there was a whole scientific direction - synergetic, which comes from recognition as a principle of motion of matter emergence of order out of disorder, chaos,

So, the modernist and post-modernist philosophy in his understanding of life does not start, a completes the old line of development of the culture in which "god is dead". Truly, a new interpretation of genesis in philosophy will be possible in the event, if the formation of the world view, fundamentally different from the modern one. But it is a matter of the future. Therefore, the philosophy of postmodernism refused from the classics, opening new ways and the rules of intellectual activity, which was a kind of response to the reflexive understanding of developments in the 20th century, global changes in the world outlook. She clarified the basic concepts and the installation and orientation, which have become fundamental to intellectual activity, characteristic of the style of thinking of the era.

First, the rejection of the truth, and consequently, the concepts such as "cause". Instead introduces the term "trace", as the only thing that remains to us instead of the previous claim to know the exact cause.

Secondly, the rejection of the category of the "essence ", orienting the researcher to search the deep roots of the phenomena leads to the emergence of the concept of "surface". In such a situation, remain unclaimed, the terms "objective", "plan": the preferred become a "game", "case".

Thirdly, the refusal of the categories of the truth, the essence, the purpose of the plan is in fact the refusal of new categorical-conceptual hierarchy, describing and research, and even the literary text in modern style. This concept does not work in postmodern, which made a bet on "anarchy".

Fourthly, in the discourse of modernity were of great importance concept of "metaphysics" and "transcendental". Postmodern opposes "metaphysics" "irony", a "transcendent" - "immanent".

In-fifth, if the modern sought to "certainty", the postmodern gravitated to the "uncertainty", making it the concept of one of the central in its intellectual practice.

Sixth, to replace the terms "genre", "border" of the text come "text" or “intertext”, "which gives thinker freedom to create, neglecting the requirements of tradition.

And, finally, postmodern focused not on creativity, synthesis, creativity, a on "deconstruction" and "destruction, "i.e., the restructuring and the destruction of the old structure of intellectual practices and culture in general. The first thing it should be noted that the Postmodern in no case is a project of the group of western intellectuals, deliberately aimed at the creation or destruction of any property, or of a certain social order. Postmodernism is the principal íåïðîåêòèâåí (in contrast to the Modernity), and one of the most common today illusions, that the Modern and Postmodern - the two opposing (or continuing to each other) project. In fact Postmodernism is only a situation or condition in which was the project of Modernity.

Postmodernism is not the same thing, that postmodernism and this is not a debate o words: postmodernism is a very definite style of late art Nouveau architecture, literature, cinema and other arts. Therefore, speaking about "postmodernists", should first of all have in mind the adherents of this style of art, philosophy, science, etc. Moreover, this style is quite modern. In Russia, for example, it can be found already in the culture of the Silver age, a possible before. Speaking o Postmodern, should be understood not narrow stylistic period, but the historical situation in which proved to be absolutely everyone, regardless of their tastes, ideas, preferences, geographical location, etc. It is interesting to note that, unlike the West, where the project of Modern been successfully completed, in the root of the changing society in Modern Russia is incomplete. This is connected with his inconsistency, and often it was introduced by the method of blind copying of western samples, mechanically something grew, is something there, and with the internal dramatic and even tragic destinies of Modernism in Russian history. As it was noted above, the project several times broken, changed direction, some quite worthy of his undertakings do not have the development and completion. The peculiarity of the situation of Postmodernism in Russia lies in the fact that along with the elements of the completed art Nouveau, brought from the outside

Thus, the geographic appears as a characteristic of the life of the people through a set of procedures and institutions identified with modernity. According to the modernists, geographic "deep and essentially sociological". They do not agree with the initial installation of the doctrine of the information society ("knowledge is power"); greater knowledge about the world does not guarantee more power over it.

 

Literature

  1. 1. Abramson P.R., Inglehart R. Generational Replacement and Value Change in Eight West European Societies. - «British Journal of Political Science», 1992, ¹ 22, p. 183– 228.
  2. Abramson P.R., Inglehart R. Value Change in Global Perspective. Ann Arbor, 1995.
  3. Alcorn M.W. The subject of discourse: (Reding Lacan through (and beyond) Post-structuralist context) // Lacanian theory of discourse: (Subject, structure and society). Ed. M. Bracher. N.Y.; L.: «Routledge», 1994. P. 19-45.
  4. Allen G. Intertextuality: (The New Critical Idiom). L.; N.Y.: «Routledge», 2000. - 238 p.
  5. Andrews F. (ed.). Research on the Quality of Life. Ann Arbor, 1986.
  6. Barker Ph. Michel Foucault: (Subversions of the Subject). N.Y.: «St. Martin's Press», 1993.-232 p.
  7. Barthes R. Science versus literature // Times Literary Supplement, 1967. Sept. 28.
  8. Belsey C. Critical practice. L.; N.Y.: «Routledge», 1980. 168 p.
  9. Belsey C. Constructing the Subject: Deconstructing the Text // Contemporary Literary Criticism: (Literary and Cultural Studies). Ed.R.C. Davis and R. Schleifer. N.Y.: «Longman», 1994. P. 354-70.
  10. Bowie M. Freud, Proust, and Lacan: (Theory as Fiction). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 225 p.
  11. Bowie M. Lacan. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1991. 244 p.