Tkachenko Sergey А.

Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Pro-rector of the International Technological University "Mykolaiv Polytechnic", Ukraine

METHODOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE MONITORING FUNCTION IN THE STRATEGIC ADJUSTMENT OF THE REGIONAL STRUCTURE AND TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE AGRO-FOOD SECTOR

It must be emphasized that in the conduct of affairs different and diverse industry and scientific-production associations, institutions, agencies and other economic unit, and there are a lot of monotonous structures, similar and related activities in the Fundamental Principles. Without removing the need for taking into account the characteristics of which are derived from the nature of the production of various industries, it said implies a certain unity of principles and methods of economic management of different industrial units. Under these conditions, one of the important challenges facing the theory and practice of monitoring subsystem is to create a system for the strategic management of the regional structure and territorial organization of agri scope of universal methodological materials for monitoring, to illuminate and explore a variety of aspects of their activities in any calendar period, the management cycle.

To solve this problem, first of all, determine what sense should invest in the concept of “methodology” in relation to the monitoring function. The methodology is theoretical and practical application of the method of monitoring subsystem, the specific use of its principles and techniques for lighting and research-driven processes and identify the causes of deviations from the set parameters.

As the current best practices of creating methodological materials for the monitoring system of strategic control of the regional structure and territorial organization of the agro-food sector, the content of the methodology, its structure, it offers technical solutions are mainly determined by three key factors of influence: the specifics of facilities management; principles of organization of control systems; monitoring features as control functions. In the first case, the methodology is influenced by all the major sustainable internal communication and mediation of the control object, which, above all, are reflected specific tangible processes of supply, production of finished products and its implementation in a particular unit of modern production. In the second case, the content of the methodology affect the objectives and purpose of the control system as a whole, the current methodology for performing the functions of planning and regulation, in relation to which the monitoring function is carried out. And in the third case, the content of the methodology is largely determined by the peculiarities of the monitoring function itself, its objectives, methods, means and techniques of lighting, research and study of industrial and economic activity. The impact of these factors leads to the fact that different objects are created to control the methodological materials on the monitoring of economic activity, on the one hand, have much in common in their content, but on the other - contain pronounced sectoral and intra features.

The methodology should be clearly and unambiguously resolved the issues on the list of monitoring objects at different levels of production management, part of the initial information, especially not a documentary, the time and how to get results-based accounting, economic analysis and indicators, the nature of the use of accounting and analytical information. Particular attention should be paid to the procedure for the use of such techniques and information processing facilities that would ensure the achievement of the timely establishment of the monitoring data.

The introduction of the system of strategic control of the regional structure and territorial organization of the agro-food sector advanced forms and methods of monitoring a large scale dictates the need to find ways to solve this problem with minimal cost and in the shortest time. One of these ways is to create a standard methodological materials. In general, a standard methodological materials refers to a set of methodological solutions, which, without any changes or with minor modifications may be applied to more than one system of strategic control of the regional structure and territorial organization of the agri-food sector. Experience has shown that the standard in the methodological materials for monitoring can generally be achieved, firstly, through the use of universal accounting and economic and analytical methods and techniques that are acceptable under all systems of the strategic adjustment of the regional structure and territorial organization of the agro-food sector, and, secondly, some methodological solutions offered redundancy caused by the necessity of taking into account the specificity of certain narrow classification groups in the regulatory system of the regional structure and territorial organization of the agri-food sector. In practice, the various parts of the methodological support of monitoring subsystem is achieved uneven level of standardization. Some fragments of the methodological decisions may be considered standard in the industry-wide scale (the method of monitoring the activities of auxiliary shops), others – only in the branch (technique of monitoring activities of the main production plants).

Standardization of methodological materials on monitoring would eliminate duplication in their design, reduce development costs, will lead to rapid replication and dissemination of the best methodological solutions and reduce the time of creation of the system of strategic control of the regional structure and territorial organization of the agro-food sector cost-effective monitoring subsystems.

List of used literature sources: 1. Berdnikova, T.B. (2003), Analiz i diagnostika finansovo-hozjajstvennoj dejatel'nosti predprijatija: uchebnoe posobie [Analysis and diagnostics of financial and economic activity of the enterprise], INFRA-M, Moskva, Russia. 2. Vyborova, E.N. (2004), “The diagnosis of the financial condition of business entities”, Auditor, vol. 3, pp. 42-46. 3. Vyborova, E.N. (2004), “The financial management system diagnostics business entity”, Auditor, vol. 12, pp. 38-41. 4. Dokukin, P.V. (2003), “Some ways of using the results of monitoring of enterprises”, Den'gi i kredit, vol. 1, pp. 41-44. 5. Serbinovskij, B. Ju. (2000), Teorija i metody diagnostiki proizvodstvennyh system [Theory and methods of diagnosis of production systems], JuRGTU, Novocherkassk, Russia. 6. Stojanov, E.A. and Stojanova, E.S. (1992), Jekspertnaja diagnostika i audit finansovo-hozjajstvennogo polozhenija predprijatija [Expert diagnostics and audit of financial and economic situation of the company], Izdatel'stvo «Perspektiva», Moskva, Russia.