Ýêîíîìè÷åñêèå
íàóêè/6. Ìàðêåòèíã è ìåíåäæìåíò
Candidate of
economic sciences, associated professor Mamrayeva D.G.,
master of
economic sciences, senior teacher Ayaganova M.P.,
master of
economic sciences, senior teacher Rakhimzhanova T.K.
Karaganda State University named after academician Y.A. Buketov,
Republic of Kazakhstan
Features
of the models of the innovation process
On the basis of the scientific works of foreign
authors like as Monchyev N., I. Perlaki, V.D. Hartman, Ye. Menefild, R. Foster,
B. Twist, J. Schumpeter and others. The analysis of existing conceptual
apparatus in the field of innovation was covered the following concepts:
innovation (innovation), innovation, diffusion of innovations, innovative
activity.
Let us analyze the definitions of the above authors.
So, B. Tvist defines innovation as a process in which the invention or idea
becoming the economic content [1, p. 32]. F. Nixon believes that innovation is
a set of technical, industrial and commercial activities, leading to the
appearance on the market of new and improved industrial processes and equipment
[2, p. 57].
The founder of the concept of «innovation» Schumpeter
treats innovation as a new scientific and organizational combination of
production factors, motivated entrepreneurial spirit. The internal logic of
innovation is new point of the economic development [3, p. 29].
At the present time applied to the technological
innovation there are the concepts which were defined by the Oslo Guidelines and
reflected in the International standards for statistics of science, technology
and innovation.
International standards on statistics of science,
technology and innovation this is the recommendations of international
organizations in the field of statistics of science and innovation, providing
the system description in the condition of market economy. In accordance with
these standards, «Innovation is the final outcome of innovation, were embodied
in the form of new or improved products, introduction on the market of a new or
improved technological process used in practice, or a new approach to social
services» [4, p. 75].
Innovation is the result of fundamental and applied
research, development and experimental work in any field of activity for
improving its effectiveness.
An important element of innovation activity is the
diffusion of innovation. Diffusion of innovations is the process of propagation
of innovations in business cycles scientific, technical, industrial,
organizational, and economic activity.
The real rate of diffusion of innovation processes
innovation depends on various factors: forms of decision-making; transmission
method information; the properties of the social system; the properties of the
innovation.
Thus, we can build a logical chain to understand the
innovation. Innovations are the basis of novelty, as a result of scientific
research, which can in turn the commercialization process creates the
innovation, and then penetrate into other areas (diffusion of innovation).
Analysis of the development model of the innovation process
was revealed the features and disadvantages of the identified models.
The model of the first generation of the innovation
process was reflected that the innovation process had an line character and
included scientific discoveries, industrial research and development,
engineering and production activities, marketing, and, finally, the appearance
on the market of a new product or process. At the same time the ideas of
creating new products appear in the R&D departments, and the market play
only a passive role, accepting the results of research and development. This
model was prevailed until the mid 60's and was known as the «technology push»
(technology push, science push).
In contrast to the first model, the second model
(«market attraction» - market pull, need pull) was assumed that innovations are
the result of detection of the buyer's needs, tightly focused researches and
development, culminating in the emergence of new products on the market.
Scientific-research designs in this case are the responses to market demands.
The third model is considered in the study suggests
that the process of innovation of the third generation (in Roswell) still had
the character of the serial, but with feedback.
Another generally accepted process model of innovation
of the third generation is a chain-Rosenberg Klein model, divided the
innovation process into five stages: the central chain of the innovation
process, iterative feedback between stages, the feedback of the market,
scientific discoveries that lead to radical innovation, contribution to the
process of innovation existing and new knowledge. The research for the creation
of new knowledge, innovation, which contribute directly to the scientific
research. This model is, in general, similar to the fifth model innovative
process, which has also been studied. The difference of this model from
Klein-Rosenberg that it complements traditional sources of innovation with
learning from experience and an array of existing external knowledge.
It should also be noted that the process of selection
and transformation of ideas into a final product can also be illustrated by a
model of the «Funnel» was developed by Steven Ujlrajt and Kim Clark. Studying
the process of developing new products, they focused their attention on the process
of selection of innovative ideas. The model describes the process of moving
from a large number of immature ideas to a limited number of promising product
variants.
Analyzing the model of the innovation process of the
first generation, we must note the insufficiently precise description of the
processes of formation of innovation. This lack of feedback for the innovation
process, and the lack of consideration of the influence of environmental
factors, and although these deficiencies were partly taken into account in the
models of the next generation, fully adequate description of the innovation
process, these models can not do it. However, the study of the features of
these models is especially important for the design of the most effective
innovation process in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
In the most of the analyzed research a
commercialization is presented like a phase of the innovation process,
beginning with the start of production, and expiring at the stagnation of the
product life cycle. This approach is flawed. For the successful implementation
of innovation is necessary to deal with its commercialization at an earlier
stage, with almost basic research in parallel assessing opportunities for the
commercialization of innovations at all stages of its creation. This
necessitates the creation of a model that takes into account all of the
circumstances.
Literature:
1. Twiss B. Management of scientific and technological
innovations. – Ì.: Economics, 1989. – 271 p.
2. Nixon F. Innovation management. – Ì.: Economics, 1997. – 240 p.
3. Shumpeter J. Theory of Economic Development. – Ì.: Progress publishing house. – 1982. – 455 p.
4.
Il'enkova S.D. Innovation
management. – Ì.: Juniti. – 1997. – 327 p.