Philological Sciences

Ph. D. Associate professor. Department of English Language. Kiseleva M. P

Institute of water transport named after G. Y. Sedov - a branch of "State Maritime University named after Admiral F. F. Ushakov", Rostov-on-don, Russia

Concept “English gentleman” in the semantic system of global studies categories

 

Global studies is defined as the interdisciplinary study of politicaleconomicecological  and  cultural interconnectedness.[1] Global studies have their own special categories. Category is a general class of ideas, terms, or things that mark divisions or co ordinations within a conceptual scheme.[2].If the ideas are general and they have certain semantic structure and a conceptual scheme it is quite natural to suppose that global studies represent a semantic system of notions, categories and concepts. Semantic system of global studies covers first of all such categories as globalization and globalism. Globalization deals with integration in various spheres: economy, finance, policy, technology and culture. As a result we have different types of globalization:

1) Financial globalization;

2) Economic globalization;

3) Technological globalization;

4) Political globalization;

5) Ecological globalization;

6) Cultural globalization.

Each of these types has its own set of terms and notions. In addition to this there is another category, which is called globalism. Joseph Nye distinguishes four distinct dimensions of globalism: economic, military, environmental — and social.[3]  Baruti Libre in his article “Home  Globalization and Globalism are not the Same! “. gives examples of globalism. They are: the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, the Third Reich of Germany and Islamic fundamentalist and terrorists.[4] These examples of globalism prove that they have nothing in common with the process of Globalization, because Globalization is understood as the process of integration. In theory globalism as an ideology should promote and facilitate this process of globalization. But in practice it is quite different.

The future of the planet must be determined by the development of Globalism and globalization on the new principles of friendly coexistence.Globalism as an ideology of future and Globalization as the future process of integration must have common principles based on moral values of trust, honesty, justice and partnership to achieve common prosperity. In other words their relations should be a pattern of gentleman’s agreement, the essence of which is that this agreement relies upon the honor of the parties for its fulfillment.[5] It is clear that such honest and true relations could be possible only among gentlemen. Gentleman is a personality of high moral standards and morality.

         Some authors namely Jean-Pierre Changeux, Carl Gustav Jung, Russian philosopher V. P. Efroimson feel the necessity of moral values so strong that consider them to be innate. Yvonne Howell [6;373] wrote that V. P. Efroimson believed that morality takes its origin in the biological, adaptive evolution of our species.

However it is difficult to agree with these ideas.  It seems very easy to prove that a child does not know what evil and justice are, because the children ask adults about the meaning of these words. The child acquires the knowledge step by step with the help of corresponding words and experience. The process of acquisition of knowledge is mediated with the help of language. The process of cognition is impossible without language.

We need language first of all and foremost to explain ourselves what is going on around us. Our life can be treated as a continuous and constant dialogue with ourselves. When we speak or think it does not mean we pronounce the whole word or a phrase because we know what we mean. We have associations with each word. When we think of the English gentleman we imagine elegant man in a fashionable stylish suit with impeccable manners, noble soul, excellent education and high standard of personal values. People remember this image from the films and books of Charles Dickens, Thackeray’s “Vanity Fair”, Jane Austen's  “Pride and Prejudice”, Charlotte Bronte’s “Jane Eyre and others. The attractive image of the English gentleman is beloved by the people. The English gentleman’s traits almost coincide with those of the Soviet builder of communism. The difference is in the fact that the image of the English gentleman has withstood the test of time in comparison with the builder. The builder was not perceived as a real man, his traits existed only on the paper of the party congresses and the English gentleman has always been the prototype of a real personality of the English origin and the ideal for the most part of the noble humanity who thinks not only about income and profit but of the future of the planet. In conclusion, it should be noted that globalism and the process of globalization are completely defined by people and depend on their personality. That is why it is important to cultivate principles of morality and noble ideals among which the ideal of the English gentleman occupies the leading place. Our future increasingly depends on statesmen, politicians, and their personality and ideals. If they behave as the gentlemen do there will be no conflicts or confrontations and as a result of this no wars. But nowadays it is still a dream, just a beautiful dream.

 

References

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_studies

.The Free dictionary. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/category

3. What are the different spheres of globalism — and how are they affected by

 globalization? Joseph Nye

https://www.theglobalist.com/globalism-versus-globalization/

4. Home  Globalization and Globalism are not the Same!  Baruti LibreApril 19,2017, Economics, Featured Articles, Chinafree market,globalism,globalization,  https://beinglibertarian.com/globalization-globalism-not/

 

5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentlemen%27s_agreement

6. Yvonne Howell. The Liberal Gene: Sociobiology as Emancipatory Discourse in the Late Soviet Union Author(s): Yvonne Howell Source: Slavic Review, Vol. 69, No. 2 (SUMMER 2010), pp. 356-376 http://leedugatkin.com/files/6514/1253/9453/Howell.pdf