Tulekova G. Ì., Poroshina E.
Social security as a basic condition of social work
Pavlodar State
University named after S. Toraighyrov, Kazakhstan
One
of the main research subjects in many scientific disciplines are different
aspects of human security and human activity. It should also be noted that in
psychology, the concept of A. Maslow, the notion of «safety» is regarded as one
of the most important human needs. In ordinary consciousness the notions of
security are faster at the level of sensations, sensual images than on the
level of reflection.
The
first interpretation of the term «security» can be found already in the
philosophical and political thought of the ancient creators, for example in the
philosophy of stoicism. Large big results of the understanding of the security
issues presented in the works of the philosophers of the Enlightenment, as well
as their predecessors and followers, in particular in the writings of W. L.
Montesquieu, J. J. Rousseau [1].
As
a product of political consciousness the concept of «security» appears in
Western social and political thought. First security as the main value and the
right man for the first time began to be considered as part of the Western
world in a revolutionary period in its history. The most important legal acts ,
the final political victory of the third estate - trade strata of the Western
community, right proclaimed security is one of the inalienable natural rights
of man. Bill of rights 1689, adopted in England, in the American Declaration of
independence of 1776 and the French Declaration of the rights of man and
citizen of 1789, directly or indirectly, the safety was seen as a natural human
rights, along with freedom, property, and resistance to oppression. Serious
destructive consequences that brought Europe to war and revolution of the
XIX-XX centuries, has had a significant impact on the evolution of human
consciousness and subsequent changes in the understanding of the term
"security". They were to mark not only the individual, but also the
status of individual Nations and the international community of states [1].
As
noted Harvard Professor E. Rothschild, over the past century interpretation of
the meaning of «security» has changed several times. It has evolved along with
the transformation that has undergone Western society: from weakly perceived
notions of security, in which it acted as internal self-perception, in the
direction of increased efficiency, certainty of this notion. In the process of
this evolution occurred verbalization and consolidation of the concept of
«security», denoting a human right and the condition of individual freedom, in
the normative-legal acts that emerged in the epoch of bourgeois revolutions in
Western Europe and America [1].
The
evolution of human history has revealed a number of regularities that
characterize the security function:
•
social progress does not remove or eliminate the danger to the existence of the
individual, society, state;
•
increase of men power over nature is
accompanied by an increase in the scale of the threats to mankind;
•
as the differentiation of society and complications his organization is
expanding range of social and hazards;
•
social threats are not fixed and modified together with the development of
society;
•
security systems are an integral part of complex social systems and
organizations;
•
underestimating or ignoring security issues at all levels of social
organization not only leads to those or other losses, but eventually,
inevitably leads to a drop in viability (competitiveness) and even the death of
the relevant elements (subjects).
There
are several main approaches to the interpretation of the meaning of «security»:
Safety
is a polysemantic concept characterizing the first security and a low level of
risk for the person, society or any other subjects, objects or systems.
Security
is a condition in which there is a complex system, when the action of external
and internal factors are not causes of action that are considered negative in
relation to this complex system, in accordance with existing, at this stage,
needs, knowledge and views.
Security
- the state of a complex system, when the action of external and internal
factors does not lead to the deterioration of the system or to the
impossibility of its functioning and development [2].
Within
the classification of types of security may apply different criteria. Depending
on what the object is protected from the dangers threatening it, you can select
the state security, public security, public safety, security of person.
Depending on the area in which it is necessary to create conditions for
mitigating threats distinguish these types of security, economic security,
political security, social security. The content and the essential
characteristics of the concept of «social security» are still in the
development stage and has not been adequately addressed in the scientific
literature [3].
The
term «social security» recently entered the scientific and political turnover.
However, he quickly blended into the international and the national language,
has found its specific development in a number of international documents.
Among them, first of all, you need to allocate social world Declaration adopted
in 1995 at the world summit for social development. In part it reads: «We
propose to build such a society, where the right to food as sacred as the right
to vote, right to primary education as revered as the right to freedom of the
press, and where the right to development is seen as one of the fundamental
human rights.»
Based
on the analysis of international experience, we can conclude that the most
effective and comprehensive social security systems usually include the
following basic elements:
-state
benefits;
-
compulsory social insurance;
-accumulative
pension funds;
-
social assistance;
Currently,
social security of each country is characterized by the total scope of social
security and used legal forms
|
Organizational-legal
forms of social security |
|||||
|
Social insurance |
Social care |
State support |
Required savings |
Private forms |
|
|
Disease (medical care
and provision for temporary disability) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The death of a breadwinner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motherhood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The content of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unemployment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accidents at production |
|
|
|
|
|
Social
policy is the most important part of state policy. In ILO Convention No. 117
«Concerning basic aims and standards of social policy», proclaimed human right
to a standard of living (including food, clothing, shelter, medical care and
social services) that are necessary to maintain health and well-being of
himself and of his family, as well as security in case of unemployment,
disability, widowhood or otherwise, loss of livelihood in independent from the
circumstances [4].
The
main document on social security can be considered as the ILO Convention No.
102 «Ñoncerning
minimum standards îf social security», adopted in 1952. and in force since 1955. Its
provisions were supplemented by Convention No. 157, «On the preservation of
rights in social security» in 1982. etc. So, Convention No. 102 includes 9
types of social security: medical care, unemployment insurance, old age
pensions, employment injury benefits, disability benefits, due to the loss of
the breadwinner, the maternity and childbirth, sickness benefits and family
allowances. The Convention did not affect only the poorest of the poor.
The
most developed system of social security in the Nordic countries, particularly
Sweden, the least developed in the USA, where the state provides only minimal
protection, and more should take care of the man himself, because everyone is
personally responsible for their lives and for their future.
General
trends in the field of social security in developed countries lie in the fact
that the social fund contributions made by companies and employees (in
Finland-only enterprises, in Germany, the Netherlands, in France, the main
burden on the workers). There are significant differences in the extent of
assistance received. So, the universal equality of rights to benefits exists in
Northern Europe, the Netherlands. On the basis of made social contributions
paid benefits and assistance in Belgium, Germany, France. In the USA and Canada
is made benefits payment
by means.
Special
direction in social policy is to support families and family allowances. Among
the EU population social support is best organized in Belgium. She also ranks
first in relative share of family benefits in average wage rates. For families
with two and three children she is, appropriately, 13.7 and 25.7%, while in
Germany - 3 and 5.8%, France 7.1 and 18.2% respectively. In Belgium there are
several legislative acts to support families with children, focusing on «social
protection and minimum income to everyone, regardless of his participation in
the production process» [4].
At
present, the policy of support for families in Belgium provides for family
allowances - they pay with the birth of the first child. The size of the
benefits depends on the professional status of parents, number of children in
the family, the sequence numbers of the child's birth. Payments are held until
the children reach 18 years of age, for students up to 25 years.
Families
with children have tax benefits: depending on the number of dependent children
the amount of non-taxable income increases, it also provides other benefits
(for use of transport, housing, recruitment). Thus, social support for families
in Belgium provides them with an acceptable level of income, reduces social
tensions. In the early 90-ies established the Institute of maternity and child
care, the services of nannies and tutors, private services for family
assistance.
Developed
the system using the family and in Austria. Here these issues are regulated by
the Act on Parental leave. The number of child benefits is quite large. For
example, a special allowance at the time of parental leave on the occasion of
the birth of the child, after birth, child benefit, if a woman returns to the
workplace (until the child reaches 12 years of age), the local child care
benefit for children. There is quite a detailed question about the tax
exemption for families with children [4].
Social
network support in the United States includes many large and small programs,
which can be divided into two main groups: programmes aimed at combating
poverty, and programs like insurance. The first programmes help to meet the
current needs of the population. The right to receive assistance and the amount
of the allowance based on the amount of income received by a person from other
sources, and also from the presence of his savings. There may be other ways to
get help: the willingness to accept the proposed work, to agree on vocational
training, etc. There are also non-financial criteria for inclusion of citizens
in the program. There are programs, objects, cares whom are veterans of wars,
people over 65 years of age, families with young children. Often these programs
are regulated at the state level, where, and sets the degree of need and state
aid.
Programs
like insurance intended for at the deteriorating situation in individual
families or individuals to maintain their standard of living, regardless of
whether they have other income. The purpose of these programs is to implement,
at least partially, the loss of income (remaining out of work, injured, etc).
There
are also private programs; for example, private pension system, funded by the
employers. Although, by definition, private programs are not included in the
social support network, they should be taken into account when assessing the
level of availability of applicants for state benefits.
Most
programs are governed by Federal law. Some of them are financed and implemented
by the Federal government, but many are being implemented by the government of
the States.
It
should be noted that despite the implementation of various programs, a certain
level of poverty in the United States exists today. So, 15% of the U.S.
population is social poverty.
In
conclusion, the experience of countries with a market economy shows the
feasibility of building a social security system based on cooperation between
government, private bodies, public associations.
Social
care about state citizens require large financial investments. At first sight
not seen the returns from these investments will increase the welfare of the
population, but the state itself. How the government spends on social programs
can be judged on the standard of living of the poorest sections of society and
what part is this group of the population in the total population of the
country.
Thus,
the social security of the population is the most important part of any
civilized state. The development of social security of the population is
closely linked with the economic situation of the country.
This
development has only just begun in the world, and in the future must be
established by the social security system that helps people to meet their
socio-economic and spiritual needs in the new conditions of market relations.
Bibliography:
1.×ìûõàëî À. Þ. Ñîöèàëüíàÿ
áåçîïàñíîñòü:Ó÷åáíîå ïîñîáèå-Òîìñê: Èçä-âî ÒÏÓ, 2007. - 168 ñ.
2. Ãóëèíà Ì.À. Ñëîâàðü-ñïðàâî÷íèê ïî
ñîöèàëüíîé ðàáîòå, Ñàíêò-Ïåòåðáóðã ,2008.-450
ñ.
4.Êîðíþøèíà Ð.Â.
Çàðóáåæíûé îïûò ñîöèàëüíîé ðàáîòû, Èçäàòåëüñòâî Äàëüíåâîñòî÷íîãî
óíèâåðñèòåòà,2004.-85 ñ.