Технические науки 1.Металлургия.
TWO-COMPONENT REDUCTANT USE IN
OBTAINING METALLIC CALCIUM
Falin V.V., Research officer “Vac ETO” LLC, Moscow,
e-mail:
raven0607@rambler.ru,
Sukharev A.V., Ph.D. of Science, vice CEO of “Vac ETO” LLC, Moscow,
Tarasov V.P., Head of Chair Nonferrous and Gold
metals institution, NUST “MISIS”, Moscow
ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ ДВУХКОМПОНЕНТНОГО
ВОССТАНОВИТЕЛЯ ПРИ ПОЛУЧЕНИИ МЕТАЛЛИЧЕСКОГО КАЛЬЦИЯ
Фалин
Владимир Викторович,
научный
сотрудник, Фирма "Вак ЭТО" г. Москва.
E-mail:raven0607@rambler.ru
Сухарев
Артем Викторович,
кандидат
технических наук, заместитель генерального директора,
Фирма
"Вак ЭТО" г. Москва
Тарасов
Вадим Петрович,
профессор, д.т.н., зав. каф.
цветных металлов и золота, НИТУ «МИСиС» г. Москва
АННОТАЦИЯ
Проведены
исследования возможности повышения выхода кальция при предварительном просеве
оксида кальция и алюминия в процессаx алюминотермического
восстановления металлического кальция. Получена формула расчета выхода кальция
в зависимости от параметров процесса. Был предложен
восстановитель, состоящий из смеси 80 ат.% Al и 20 ат.%
Fe, для которого микроструктура шихты после восстановления не
отличается от микроструктуры шихты после стандартного алюминотермического
восстановления. Для реакции металлотермического восстановления оксида кальция
двухкомпонентным восстановителем предложен аналитический метод, учитывающий
тепловую реакцию компонентов восстановителя, позволяющий оценивать возможный
выход кальция по результатам экспериментов, проведенных при одной температуре.
Ключевые слова: кальций; восстановление
оксида кальция; вакуумная печь; алюминотермическое восстановление, смачивание.
ABSTRACT
Property to increase the calcium yield as a result of
advanced minus sieving (or screen sizing) of calcium oxide and aluminium in
aluminothermic reducing processes were investigated. The calcium yield formula
was obtained dependent from process characteristics. The mixture with 80at.% of Al and 20at% of Fe was suggested as reductant,
the charge microstructure which is
indifferent after the reduction from those that been provided with standard
aluminothermic reduction. Analytical
method is suggested to metallothermic reaction of calcium oxide by the
two-component reductant that considers heat reaction of reducing components
enable to measure possible calcium yield by experimental results accumulated at
single temperature.
Key words: calcium, calcium oxide reduction, vacuum furnace, aluminothermic
reduction, wetness.
Calcium oxide
aluminothermic reduction is well-known and one of basic employed industrial processes in obtaining metallic calcium
[1]. As a cost of this procedure, up to 60% expenses define to the metallic
reductant cost, which stimulates to search new, far cheap reductants. This
requires analyzing factors influent to the dynamic of the process more
attentively.
As the priority,
the cost of obtained calcium, not its purity, is needed for the steel industry,
a capability to produce calcium by the cheaper reductant was our investigation. The calcium was obtained in the vacuum
distilled electric furnace VOzh-16-22 (fig. 1), the heating block which was prepared
from the carbon-carbon composite material (CRC) of different density; there was
a calcium vapors condenser cooled by water in the furnace; membrane pump that
allows to provide water vapors exhaustion (at relatively low temperatures), is
available in the vacuum system.
The X-ray phase
analysis was performed on X-ray diffraction machine DRON-3 in the CuKα.
Scanning electron
microscopy was evaluated on the electron microscope FEI Quanta 600 FEG with the
energy disperse X-ray microanalysis attachment EDAX. The mass of samples was
measured on laboratory electronic scales AJH-620CE.
Powders were mixed in the turbulence mixer C2.0 with
40rpm of frequency within 60 min.
The following materials were employed in this work:
(content in % mass):
-
Calcium oxide trademark Schaefer
Precal from Schaefer Kalk company as the content of the calcium carbonate was ~2%
and hydroxide ~1%; MgO – 0.5%; SiO2 – 0.1%.
-
Aluminium of AVP; with the aluminium
content such as: Mn – 0.38%, Cu – 0.063%, Si – 0.063%, Fe – 0.31%, Mg – 2.1%,
Zn – 0.06%, C – 0.023%, Ti – 0.65%; the particle size ≤ 2mm, the active
aluminium content less than 98.3%
-
Iron shot number 0.5 with the content
of: C~4%, Si – 1.2 – 2.0% and Mn – 0.4 – 0.7%/
-
Aluminium wire AD1 with diameter
1.6mm

Fig. 1 Vacuum distilled furnace VOzh-16-22
Experiments with
calcium oxide of different particle content were performed by us and with aluminium wire (aluminium is
chosen as explored metal-reductant).
In the famous
work it was found that milling of calcium oxide increases the yield of the calcium
in aluminothermic reduction [2].
The dynamics of
reduction determines by interphase boundary sizes for CaO-Al(melt)-Ca(vapor)
heterogeneous system whereas other parameters being equal. Within this framework, analogical
experiments were conducted to study the influence of advanced sieving (or
screen sizing) particles of CaO powder with Al mark of AVP using to the calcium
yield value as well as the influence of administrated aluminium size to the
calcium yield. The reduction was carried out in the VOzh-16-22 under following
terms: the temperature is 13500C, the curing time (holding) is 3
hours, residual pressure is 1-10Pa.
The dependence
between the calcium yield (relative yield) and average CaO powder size (after
particle separation on sizes) as a result of reduction at 13000C,
holding within 3 hours and residual pressure of 1-10Pa is given on the fig. 2.
Contrast to these reports [2], it is found a nonmonotonic dependence of the
yield on the particle size of the calcium, which is a reliable approximation
value of R2 = 0.93 can be recorded as a
polynominal of the 2 stage. Maximum yield was correspondent to the particle size
x: 0.63 ≤ x ≤ 0.8mm.
The inverse problem to determine the influence of the
aluminium yield to the calcium yield in the aluminothermic CaO reduction was
suggested while comparing calcium oxide reduction with Al mark AVP and its wire
AD1. The table 1 demonstrates particle
size of the AVP powder and its distribution along the aluminium wire length.

Fig. 2 Relative calcium
yield in the aluminothermic oxide reduction in dependence of particle size of
CaO; the confidential interval is correspondent to the “diameter” point in the
yield determination.
Table 1. Mesh-size distribution (sizes in mm) AVP,
besides distribution along the wire AD1 length L, used as reductants.
|
|
Percentage particle
content,% |
|||||||
|
1,6≤x<2,5 |
1,25≤x<1,6 |
1≤x<1,25 |
0,63≤x<1 |
0,16≤x<0,2 |
L≤2 |
2<L≤3 |
3<L≤5 |
|
|
AVP |
33,3 |
33,6 |
20,9 |
12,1 |
0,1 |
- |
- |
- |
|
AD1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
12 |
35 |
53 |
Despite apparent differences in the value of aluminium
reductant surfaces (powder and wire), the calcium yield was above 7% according
to the mentioned mode in the case of using AVP powder (the confidence interval
determination was ±1.2%) as compared to those where the same quantities of
aluminium is used on wire.
Using the primary
sieving (screen sizing) operation of calcium oxide is influent to the yield
value thereby, as well as the size of used reductant (in the studied range).
It was
demonstrated previously that the yield value depends in the wetting ability of
the oxide surface by reducing agent, besides the difference in the electronegativity
of the metal-reductant [3]. Since the
one of basic expenses during the aluminothermic reduction is the cost, it is
necessary to minimize the cost of the reductant. Such requirements are
satisfied by the cast-iron, for instance.
To answer the
question whether it is possible to reduce calcium oxide by the cast-iron,
series of experiments were performed in the VOzh-16-22 with residual pressure
of 1Pa, and the temperature of 1350 ±200C with holding within 3 hours. The
sample of conventional calcium oxide reduction by aluminium was used as
“evident”. The briquette content
(%mass): calcium oxide 72% - 28% of the iron shot (iron); calcium oxide 76% -
aluminium of 24%. The calcium yield in provided experiments was as follows:
using Fe – 0.20; Al – 0.57 as reducing agents.
Following the calcium oxide reduction by the cast-iron,
spherical particles till 1.5mm were found on the briquette surface. The same
were located on the depth of the briquettes. The shape of these particles
indicates a negligible amount of wetting in the system Fe-CaO. The cast-iron lines are visible on the
diffraction pattern of briquettes (fig. 4). Consequently, a significant portion
of the reducing metal was not involved in the reducing reaction.

Fig. 3 Briquette surface photo after the Fe – reduction (cast-iron)

Fig. 4 Diffraction pattern of briquettes after reduction. Non-determined
maximums are calcium oxide and hydroxide.
The results
showed ineffective reduction of the calcium oxide by “pure” cast-iron
therefore, it was analyzed a possibility to produce two-component reductant as
aluminium-cast iron.
The following
systems like calcium oxide – aluminium oxide – ferric oxides were studied well
enough, for instances, in [4,5]. However, interface wetting issues remained outside
researcher’s interests.
In the present
study calcium oxide powders and reductant (R) were mixed in ratio 80%at of CaO:
20%at of R, and then pressed to briquettes. The iron shot DChL and aluminium
powder AVP mixture was employed as the reductant R in numerous proportions (%
at): 80Al-20Fe, 60Al-40Fe, 40Al-60Fe, 20Al-80Fe, 100Fe. The reduction mode was
analogical to the aluminothermic reduction (temperature 13500C,
holding time within 3 hours, at residual pressure 1Pa).
The table 2 exposes data upon the calcium yield,
defined as the number of produced calcium to the calcium amount in the oxide of
the primary charge.
Table 2. The
charge phase content after reduction and the yield from the calcium in the
dependence of the reductant composition.
|
Reductant composition R, at.% |
The charge phase
content after reduction |
Calcium’s yield, % (1350 0C,
180 min.) |
|
100Al |
12CaO*7Al2O3, Al2Ca |
57 |
|
80Al – 20Fe |
12CaO*7Al2O3,
4CaO*7Fe2O3, Al2Ca |
53 |
|
60Al -40Fe |
3CaO*Al2O3, 12CaO*7Al2O3, CaO, CaAl1,9O4C0,4,
Al0,4Fe0,6 |
37 |
|
40Al – 60Fe |
3CaO*Al2O3, 12CaO*7Al2O3, CaO, Fe2O3 |
33 |
|
20Al-80Fe |
12CaO*7Al2O3,
CaAl1,9O4C0,4, CaO, (Fe0,899Al0,101)*(Al0,899Fe0,101)O4 |
28 |
|
100Fe |
CaO, Fe, Fe2O3 |
20 |
As the Table 2 shows (deviation in determination is ±2%),
a monotonic decrease of calcium yield is observed while there is an increase of
iron-cast in the reductant composition.
Moreover, an exclusion of iron cast from the composition, i.e. aluminium
reduction at R=16%at, gives 42%.
Under various
costs of aluminium and iron-shot nearly by 5 times, employing the reductant
80%at of Al – 20%at of Fe is able to low it less than 25%, when the reductant
is acquired, practically without decreasing the yield in comparison to the
aluminothermic reduction.
SEM analysis of data with successively decreasing amount
of iron-cast demonstrates that withdrawal and disappearance of areas are
occurred (at 20 atomic % of iron and 80 atomic % of aluminium), despite the
presence of local variations in the composition of the charge, where only iron
or only aluminium are located, which characterize the component with low Al
content.
The charge microstructure, containing 80 at.% Al and
20 at/% iron-cast (fig. 5) is similar with the structure of the charge after
aluminothermic reduction (fig. 6).

Fig. 5 Microstructure and linear structure elements composition of the
charge after reduction with the 80at% Al and 20% iron-cast mixture

Fig. 6 The charge microstructure after aluminothermic reduction
Previously [6], in order to explain discrepancies
between the energy activation value of the reductant, defined in the yield
analysis with temperature, besides heat vaporization values of the calcium and
diffusion activation energy in structures similar to CaO, the formula, the
conclusion which is based on dependence between the surface tension and
temperature, is suggested:
(1)
Y, T, TLiq, t,
denote the yield value of the calcium, reducing temperature, deterioration temperature,
reducing time, respectively. n- is the constant, dependent from the stage of
the process: at n = 0.5 the process is controlled by the chemical reaction, at
n=0.33 the diffusion is control stage [4], if n=0, it is correspondent to
depletion of reducing areas. K, Q, A
denote coefficient of proportionality, heat vaporization of the calcium and the
area over which the calcium evaporation is presented, respectively (the
crucible area).
Comparison (1)
with experimental data constitutes a quite satisfactory match for the aluminothermic
reduction [6]. However, the spread between the calculated and experimental
values is far tangible for the reductant that consists of aluminium and
iron-cast. We hypothesized to be a necessity
in energy consideration due to exothermic reaction in the aluminium and
iron-cast mixture:
(2)
Employing
aluminium or iron-cast as the reductant, the energetic capability of the
CaO-reductant system must compensate the heat vaporization of the calcium.
Using
two-component reductant, among which exothermic reaction is followed with reduction,
the energy expenses are lower. In the formula (1), Q means the following:
(3)
Qvapor.,
denote the heat vaporization of
the calcium and enthalpy alteration of the exothermic reaction (2) at the
temperature T of the process, respectively.
Fig. 7 demonstrates a comparison of the yield upon
experimental data and calculated according to (1) – (3), which is dependent
from the reducing composition (holding time is 3 hours for all experiments). Melting point in the iron-cast (4% wt) was
11850C.


a) b)


c) d)

e)
Fig.7 Dependence of the
calcium yield from the reducing temperature of CaO:
![]()
calculated values experimental values a) reductant content 80% at. Al – 20% at.
Fe; b) reductant content 60% at. Al – 40% at. Fe; c) reductant content 40% at.
Al – 60% at. Fe; d) reductant content 20% at. Al – 80% at. Fe; e) reductant
content is 100% of Fe.Total content of briquettes is 80% at. of CaO; 20% at. of
the reductant. Deviation of yield dimension is
, deviation in temperature dimension
is
.
As results show, calculated values
and experimental data are in good agreement with all types of reducing agents,
except iron-cast (without aluminium) with low wetting of the calcium oxide as
it was mentioned above. Consequently,
ability to estimate
analytically the calcium yield is limited by wetting material of the reductant
on the surface of the calcium oxide in the metallothermic reduction of the CaO.
Delivered
results admit to specify the following:
· Performing reduction the particle size changes of calcium oxide (sieving
or screen sizing) are inefficient to the calcium yield in the same terms
(average size 0.2-1.5mm). Aluminium size changes are independent to the calcium
yield, raising aluminium size till 3mm decreases the calcium yield.
· Ability to replace pure aluminium on to the mixing system Al-Fe-C was studied
as the content of the reductant varies from 100% of aluminium to 100% of
iron-cast.
· Scanning electron
microscopy and X-ray analysis demonstrated the microstructure and phase content
of the charge with reductant composition 80% at. CaO and 20% at. iron-cast
after reduction (the charge content 80%at CaO and 20% at. reductant)
corresponds to microstructure and phase content of aluminates with aluminium
content in the charge of 40%at after aluminothermic reduction
· Correction was applied and
experimentally confirmed with accuracy of the yield ±3.5% the suggested analytical
dependence between calcium yield and temperature in constant presence of
two-component reductant during two-composition reductants research.
· Obtained results allow expenses in acquiring the reductant to lower less
than 25% in comparison with aluminothermic reduction in similar yield value.
References
1. Obzor rynka kal'tsiya metallicheskogo v Rossii i mire.
http://www.infomine.ru. avgust 2011 g. – 102 s.
2. Matvienko I.I., Demenev N.V. Аlyumotermicheskoe
vosstanovlenie okisi kal'tsiya, Trudy instituta khimii. Ural'skij filial АN
SSSR, 1958, vyp.2, str.121-131.
3. Falin V.V., Minkov A.O., Sukharev A.V.,
Tarasov V.P. Reductant melt boundary tension effect on metal thermal
reduction of calcium oxide// Mezhdunarodnyj
nauchno-issledovatel'skij zhurnal: Sbornik po rezul'tatam XXV zaochnoj nauchnoj
konferentsii Research Journal of International Studies, 2014, №3, Часть 2, с.72 – 74.
4. Zotzl M., Pollmann H. Stability and properties of brownmillerites Ca2(Al,Mn,Fe)2O5
and perovskites Ca(Mn,Fe)O3-x in the system Ca2Fe2O5-"Ca2Mn2O5"
- "Ca2Al2O5"// J.Am.Ceram.Soc.,
2006,v.89, № 11, p. 3491-3497-79.
5. Nikolik S., Genao G., ZHao B., KHajes P.S. Fazovoe ravnovesie v
shlakovoj sisteme FeO – Fe2O3 – CaO – SiO2//Tsvetnye metally, 2011, №8/9, s. 73
– 80.
6. Falin V.V., Minkov O.B., Molev G.V. i dr. Vozmozhnost' zameny alyuminiya
v proizvodstve metallicheskogo kal'tsiya vosstanovleniem ego oksida//Tsvetnye
metally, 2014, №1, s.53 – 58.