I.P.Torshina, Y.G.Yakushenkov

                                           

Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK)

Gorokhovsky by-str., 4, Moscow 105064, Russia

           

General Methodology of  Modern Electro-Optical Devices’ Computer Modeling

 

 

ABSTRACT

 

      General methodology of modern electro-optical devices’ computer modeling is described. Some peculiarities of computer modeling for 3th generation of electro-optical devices are marked. Analytic  method  of  evaluating  adequacy and robustness  is offered.

 

     Key words: electro-optical device, computer modeling, model adequacy

 

        1.INTRODUCTION

 

 Electro-optical systems are the devices which use optical radiation (optical signals) as a carrier of information on the object being investigated or observed and convert the energy of radiation into electric energy for preliminary data processing. The electro-optical devices (EOD) engage with wide variety of applications, as example, ground, air, and space based systems. Setting of the range performance for the complex target-background situation is a difficult and expensive task enough. Many traditional methods of designing don’t take account of complexity and changeability of the target-background situation, the particular feature of the concrete system, and other factors.  Therefore it has been proposed to utilize a computer modeling for assessment.

   Role of computer modeling for projecting, testing, and investigation modern EOD is well-known. Computer modeling is used both for parametrical analysis and for the new EOD’ synthesis. It permits modeling the variety structures of the systems with necessary adequacy, calculating their figures of merit for different target-background situations, evaluating effectiveness of modern element base, deciding many another tasks, what permits to shorten time and cut down elaboration cost. Modeling permits shortening volume of expensive and convincing experiment essentially, and refusing against it often.             

Now the many electro-optical systems’ computer models are known. But the most of them are used for synthesis and analysis of the special EODs or particular cases their working conditions. Many models are counted on information users only but not designers. Therefore the general methodology of computer modeling for such complex system as EOD is represented very useful.

A certain version of generalized EOD computer model (EOD CM) has been worked out by the Electro-Optical Design Department, the Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK). Our general methodology of   EOD CM construction has been stated in [1,2,3]. The peculiarities of multispectral EOD modeling based on general EOD CM has been marked in [4,5].

The functional program ensuring of EOD CM may be divided into two parts: 1. composition of EOD CM, and 2. appraisal of its adequacy.

 

         2. SOME GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF EOD CM COMPOSITION

 

 

The structure EOD CM is the aggregate of its main blocks (submodels). These submodels are: “Starting Data”, “Figures of Merit”, “Scenario”, “EOD Structure”, “Result of Computer Modeling”, “Data Base of Computer Model” (Fig.1).  Due to modular structure of the model it is possible to simulate a wide range of different EOD and interactions between the EOD, the observed scene, its environment, and the date processing algorithms.

 

Interface of computer modeling program

Starting data

 

Figures of merit

 

Scenario

EOD structure

 

Result of computer modeling

 

Data base of computer model

 

Fig.1. Structure of  EOD general model

 

Software has been given as descriptions of the phenomenology submodels and data base.

 The model executive allows user to realize various conceptions of EOD operating and to modify these conceptions working out in its details, or simplifying the model in accordance with the available data bases and the requirements to model adequacy.

The submodel “Starting Data” contains a list of information what  computer program’s  user  must  know for EOD modeling. It is formed on the basis of technical assignment for EOD designing. This list may be defined finally after forming others submodels, in particular “Scenario” and “EOD Structure” submodels.

 The submodel “Starting Data” has a direct connection with all submodels and feedback connection with submodels “Result of Computer Modeling” and “Date Base of Computer Model”. A feedback with submodel “Date Base of Computer Model” permits to select starting data to be demanded from corresponding block of data base. A feedback with submodel “Result of Computer Modeling” helps to optimize the EOD structure if it needs to correct starting data.

 A basis of “Figures of Merit” submodel is the formulas of demanded indexes (figures of merit) of  EOD working efficiency which are presented in general parametric form at the first designing stage. During modeling these indexes are calculated. If they don’t be satisfied the optimization of  EOD structure and correction of its elements’ parameters may be used.

The  submodel “Scenario” takes account of reciprocal disposition of objects, backgrounds and  interferences to be observed in EOD  field-of-view as well as outer conditions of EOD operating (environmental  characteristics). The submodel has been developed to promote setting of radiant flux or irradiance values from objects and other radiators at the EOD entrance pupil in working spectral band. The submodel expresses the radiances of objects, backgrounds and interferences as functions of their temperatures, emissivities, reflectivities as well as the coordinates and shape factors of the radiators. This submodel makes it possible for the concrete EOD and its scenario of operating to formulate a basic radiometric equation which enables the user to define the most important geometrical parameters of the optical system, such as the entrance pupil area, focal number, field-of-view, and to determine the noise equivalent power or detectivity of a detector [2].

Individual subsystems of the “EOD Structure” submodel (“Optical System”, “Detector”, “Electronic Block”, “Display”, etc.) may be represented by their modulation transfer functions (MTF). The functions as well as specific parameters of the EOD elements may be packed into special blocks of submodel “Data Base of Computer Model”. The MTF of the entire EOD is composed of a number of partial MTF. These functions may be used to determine a noise bandwidth and others figures of merit of EOD, for example, “Signal-Noise Ratio at EOD Exit”.

    The submodel “Data Base of Computer Model” concludes a set of different blocks: “Radiators”, “Atmosphere”, “EOD Elements and Algorithms Base Data” “EOD Figures of Merit”, and many others. These blocks (data bases) may be realized as analytic forms, for example, transfer functions of individual EOD blocks, as numeric, graphs, tables, etc. Parameters and characteristics of many possible radiators and the earth atmosphere have been packed into separate  blocks. This block architecture has been successfully implemented using object-oriented engineering software techniques.

 

3.     SOME PECULIARITIES OF COMPUTER MODELING FOR 3th EOD GENERATION

 

Usually EOD 3th generation are named the devices working in two- or multi-spectral ranges in which matrix focal plane arrays detectors are used. These devices may be both two- or many-channels when optics of each channel are divided and one-channel when there is one optical system but spectral ranges are divided in two- or multi-spectral detectors [5,6]. A general structure scheme of multi-stage EOD 3th generation (EOD-3) is showed at Fig.2.

 

 

 

Fig.2. Structure of  multispectral EOD

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Computer model of EOD-3 may be formed on the basis of the general EOD CM by means of addition special module “Correction of General EOD CM” supplementing of “Data Base of Computer Model” by parameters and characteristics of optical materials with wide spectral transmission, optical elements realizing spectral decomposition (prisms, diffraction gratings, filters, etc.), two- and multispectral detectors, systems of images’ combination.

For EOD-3 modeling it needs a more detailed data base including spectral characteristics of optical radiation, transmission, and detection. The question about simplification of spectral characteristics and presentation of the model adequacy is formed at the first stages of modeling already.

Calculation  algorithms of  definition the reflection, the transmission, and the absorption for various surfaces of targets, backgrounds, and obstacles must take into consideration changing these physical quantities for different wavelengths and orientations of the surfaces.

User can use such specific EOD-3 figures of merit as the spectral contrast ratio, the difference of individual spectral signals, the spectral ratio, the logarithmic spectral ratio.

 

4. ADEQUACY AND ROBUSTNESS OF EOD CM

 

     Adequacy is one of basic requirements for EOD CM. It is characteristic of authenticity of any EOD properties representation and conditions of its work. It is advisable to have adequacy assessment as an errors function or criterion of adequacy (CA) which may be quantitative measure of difference between the model and object-original characteristics, for example, the EOD figures of merit [5].

     At the first stages of  EOD designing it is advisable CA evaluation through the rejection  of  EOD figures of merit from the meaning to have been assigned. It may be convenient to evaluate an adequacy with the help of numeral methods. So the meaning is depended on EOD parameters and characteristics changes it is possible to use the method of exact differential for CA calculating. Separate parts of the perfect differential (the partial derivatives) are  determined by parameters of individual EOD blocks. Forming the histograms of  figure of merit differences  as a functions of  the input EOD parameters it may be possible to find the partial derivatives of  a figure of merit  function  and calculate the perfect differential as a base for finding of the error function and CA.

     Testing of adequacy and robustness of EOD CM may be both analytic and experimental. Analytic method is used at the first stages of EOD designing i.e. the object-original is absent. At next stages it is expedient to conduct the experimental testing of adequacy as physical experiment.

 

                          

                              5. CONCLUSION

 

    The general structure of  EOD CM, forming  as the aggregate of some blocks (submodels) permits its using for different  practical cases, accounting EOD structure’s and exploitation conditions’ changing. Computer model of EOD-3 may be formed on the basis of the general EOD CM by means of addition special module “Correction of General EOD CM” supplementing of “Data Base of Computer Model”. At the first stages of  EOD designing it may be possible to find the partial derivatives of  a figure of merit  function  and calculate the perfect differential as a criterion of  the model adequacy.

            

 

                                                  BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

1.      I.P.Torshina . “Computer Modeling of Electro-Optical Preliminary Data Processing Systems”. - Moscow, Logos Publisher, 2009.– 248 p. (rus.),

2.      Y.G.Yakushenkov.  Electro-Optical Devices: Theory and Design. - Moscow, Logos Publisher, 2011.– 568 p. (rus.),

3.      I.P.Torshina and Y.G.Yakushenkov.  “Structure of General Electro-Optical Systems’ Computer Model”.- Science-Technical  Herald of Sankt-Petersburg State University IFMO, 2009, ¹ 6(64). P.5-9 (rus),

4.      V.V.Tarasov, I.P.Torshina and Y.G.Yakushenkov.  “Infrared Systems of 3-th Generation”.- Moscow, Logos Publisher, 2011.– 240 p. (rus.),

5.      I.P.Torshina and Y.G.Yakushenkov.  Peculiarities of Computer Modeling for Electro-Optical Systems of 3th generation. – Optical Journal (Journal of Soviet Optical Technology), 2009, ¹ 2, P. 87-89 (rus)

6.      V.V.Tarasov and Y.G.Yakushenkov. Two- and Multispectral Electro-Optical Devices with Focal Plane Arrays. - Moscow, Logos Publisher, 2007.- 192 p. (rus.),

 

 

 

I.P.Torshina – Dr.Sc., Dean of Optical-Information Systems and Technologies Faculty, the Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK)

Y.G.Yakushenkov – Prof., Dr. Sc., Chief of Electro-Optical Department, Optical-Information Systems and Technologies Faculty, the Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK)