Right / 8. Constitutional law

 

associate professor, Cand.Jur.Sci., Guseva A.,

associate professor, Cand.Jur.Sci., Danilova V.

 

Penza state university, Russia

To a question of structure constitutionally - a legal mechanism of protection of the rights and freedoms of the person and the citizen in the Russian Federation

 

The question of structure of the mechanism of protection of human rights and the citizen as a whole in jurisprudence remains open, debatable. In relation to this or that constitutionally consolidated right scientists the features of structure seem. For example, the constitutional legal mechanism of protection of a constitutional law on freedom of business activity represents the difficult constitutional and legal phenomenon which is turning on interstate and international mechanisms (forms and means of protection, etc.).  The special importance in its structure, from our point of view, is occupied by system of law enforcement agencies, and also certain means, ways and protection forms by means of which subjects of human rights activity carry out protection of the violated constitutional right.  The central place in rather big arsenal of human rights links of the considered mechanism is taken by judicial protection.  In turn realization of the right to judicial protection is provided by the constitutional guarantees as which it is necessary to understand legal conditions, means and the ways provided by the basic law of the country by means of which there is a restoration of the violated rights.

It is necessary to emphasize, agreeing with the points of view of some scientists that the Constitution of the Russian Federation doesn't exhaust all means and mechanisms of legal protection of the person.  There are the means defined and other laws.  But all of them exist, are obliged to exist in the constitutional field, in the constitutional framework [4.C.8].

That the structure of a constitutional legal mechanism of protection of the rights and freedoms of the person and the citizen during a certain period of development of the economic, legal, social, political relations can undergo changes is remarkable also, possessing features inherent in it. As confirmation of the told the institutes of ombudsmen created now serve: The representative on human rights, the Representative by the rights of the child Authorized on protection of the rights of businessmen, etc. In particular, A.P. Aleksandrova was repeatedly pointed to distinctive feature of protection of the economic rights. So, with it is emphasized that the state, municipal and public control which has to be accompanied by sufficient financing [3.C.11].

In structure of the studied mechanism it is possible to allocate: the international and interstate rules of law regulating protection of constitutional laws and freedoms of the person; object of protection – constitutionally fixed constitutional laws and personal freedoms; forms and subjects of protection of constitutional laws of the person, system of the last form the government bodies allocated with constitutional legal status; public associations and organizations; self-defense; international legal mechanism of protection of constitutional laws and freedoms.

 The regulatory base of the mechanism of protection of constitutional laws is made by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the federal legislation, the constitution (charter) of the subject of Federation, laws of subjects of Federation, the charter and normative legal acts of local governments. Also this system joins Resolutions of the Constitutional Court on interpretation of provisions of the Basic law of our state, recognition of these or those regulations not corresponding to it, resolutions of the constitutional (authorized) vessels of subjects of Federation on interpretation of the constitution (charter) of the subject of Federation, and also on recognition not corresponding laws of the subject of the constitution (charter) of the subject of Federation. Considering that the principles and norms of international law are included in structure of legal system of the Russian Federation, it should be noted that they also enter into set standardly – a legal basis of the constitutional mechanism of protection of the rights and freedoms of the person and the citizen. As an example we can specify the European Convention on protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms of 1950 (further - the Convention).

According to M.I. Abdullaev, the most effective mechanism of protection of human rights is created in Europe [2. C.194]. It concerns, first of all, such institute, as the European Economic Union created in 1949 after which education, in 1950 in Rome the European convention on protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms was signed. In Art. 19 the Convention defined bodies of jurisdiction independent of the participating states, it is the European Commission on Human Rights and the European Court on human rights. The Convention consolidates the right of the citizen to address in the first supranational judicial authority – the European Court on human rights. However, all control mechanism of the Convention is based now on opportunity to address in the European Court with the individual complaint by which consideration it is actually checked as far as the respondent state at national level fulfilled voluntary assumed liability on ensuring the rights and freedoms of the person and the citizen. Besides, directed to the European Court on human rights the individual complaint will be recognized unacceptable if the applicant didn't settle internal remedies (p.1 Art. 35. Convention), i.e. didn't make attempt to call the state for the performance of obligations, following from the international treaty. This provision of the Convention, in our opinion, plays a positive role in a constitutional legal mechanism of protection of the rights and freedoms of the person and the citizen as demands from the state at interstate level of considerable efforts on realization of the rights and freedoms.

It should be noted, agreeing with A.M. Nikolaev that the great value in this regard gets formation of the interstate rules of law corresponding to provisions the Convention, and also right applications by competent authorities of the government.  Emergence of the interstate law-enforcement practice based on the European standards is obviously important.  In other words, constitutional and legal nature of implementation of the Convention in the Russian Federation is urged to provide recognition, observance and protection of the rights and freedoms of the person at the constitutional level in a context of its provisions [5.C.19].

It is indisputable that international legal protection it is the difficult system of elements making it having special value for the interstate mechanism of protection of the rights and freedoms of the person.  In a general view it can be defined, how the international cooperation of the states recognized by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and acts of the Russian Federation by recognition, establishment, protection and protection of fundamental human rights with use of the international mechanisms [6.C.243] that is fully applicable to protection of any of the constitutional laws fixed in the legislation and freedoms.

 

Literature:

1.     Constitution of the Russian Federation. It is accepted on December 12, 1993.

2.     Abdullaev M. I.  Human rights and law:  Historical and theoretical aspects.    SPb.:  Legal Press Center publishing house, 2004.  Page 194.

3.     Aleksandrova A.P.     Protection of the social and economic rights and freedoms:     general-theoretical analysis. Kazan, 2002. Page 9-12.   

4.     Zorkin V.D. Rossiya and its Constitution//Magazine of the Russian right. 2003 . No. 11. Page 8.

5.     Nikolaev A.M. European convention on protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Realization constitutional legal mechanism in the Russian Federation. // Law and right. 2011 . No. 8. Page 19.

6.     Stremoukhov A.V. Legal protection of the person. – SPb. : Publishing house of SPb state unitary enterprise, 2007. Page 243.