Law/8.Konstitutional law
Glynianska O.V., student
K. j. s., doc. Venislavskiy F.V. – scientific leader
National Law academy of Ukraine named after Yaroslav
the Wise
CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHTS OF CHILD IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE
International
agreements, signed by Ukraine, avouch for the Ukrainian children sufficiently
the wide volume of rights. But in a national legislation the mechanisms of realization of some rights are not
foreseen, that does not answer international standards. For example
imperfection of mechanism of realization independently of the rights a
child in order of the civil procedure
has the consequence of violation some her constitutional rights, among which
and right on expression of idea, and free choice of residence.
In
civil procedure to the basic category of businesses which touch rights for a
child the disputes of domestic character belong : determination of residence
child; to participation of one of parents in education of child; privation and
proceeding
in paternal rights
and others like that.
According to
international standards, a child in a court has a right: а) to be informed by clear speech about motion of
process, about awarded judgement and him law consequences; b) to elect a legal
representative and declare a solicitor; c) to express the opinion of (but not
only to be polled in quality of witness) own free will. But a national
legislation, contains procedures not enough which would guarantee observance of
these and other rights for a child in civil procedure and would guard a little
man from stress and manipulation from the side of adults.
When
speech calls about rights for a child, we reminisce, foremost, Convention
rights for the child of UNO, which contains not only the most complete
catalogue of rights for a child but also mechanism of their realization. Among
all rights, envisaged Convention of UNO
an important value in providing of rights for a child in civil procedure
has a right for every child freely to
express the opinion. For his practical providing, a child gets possibility to
participate in trials which touch her interests - independently or through
legal representatives. However Convention of UNO does an accent on judicial
rights. This blank is filled in other international agreement - European
Convention about realization of rights for a child. Judicial rights for a child
are clearly prescribed in Convention what participates in a trial. In 2006 year
Convention was ratified by Ukraine. However, necessary changes in a current
legislation to this time are not brought in.
Hereupon
the Ukrainian court is the hostage of
situation - a national legislation in this sphere has oppressive blanks. To our
opinion, to Ukraine necessary conception of juvinal justice. In civil procedure
which most businesses are examined within the framework of what need account of
opinion of child - her judicial rights are not provided. A legislation (century
182 ЦПК) foresees the order of
interrogation of very young and minor witnesses only. But even it takes place
very much rarely. Why? In default of clear procedure to the judge does not complicate to itself life, and
necessary for awarding judgement information they are inclined to get from
other sources. For example, from the conclusions of organs of guardianship and
caring. However, a child quite often comes forward as a not witness and by the
side of trial. And in this case application of the mentioned article of
Civilly-judicial Code already not possibly. In such case a judge in general can
not poll a child - there is not legislatively certain procedure. It appears
that rights for a child are not supported corresponding by procedure which
eliminates possibility of their realization actually.
For the correction
of situation which was folded in this sphere it is necessary as quick as possible : at first, to stop gap
in a legislation, providing procedure of realization of rights for a child at
legislative level; secondly to spare the most serious attention to the system
preparations of judges, which take shipping, which touch rights and interests of
child.