Law/5. Criminal law and criminology

 

K.Yu.N. Zhadan V. N.
Kazan Federal University, Elabuga Institute, Russia
On the criminological aspects of crime

 

The analysis of a criminogenic situation in Russia, criminological characteristics of crime and its certain types, and the number of crimes solved [1] subject of many publications, that in no way detracts from the author to address the issues characterizing the criminological aspects of crime detection.

It is generally accepted that the Russian state, its regions, cities and other settlements, are characterized not only by political, socio-economic, climatic and cultural and moral processes and conditions, but no less the maintenance of public order and security that characterize the crime situation and crime detection.

Before we move on to the analysis of a criminogenic situation in Russia, criminological characteristics of crime and crime detection, it is advisable to determine the meaning of the terms used, "detection of crime" and "crime detection".

B the science of criminology and forensic science celebrated by the similarity of these terms, this is evidenced by the etymological proximity of the initial part of the terms "drop-...". At the same time regardless of the etymological roots between the concepts of "solving crimes" and "crime detection", there are certain differences in meaning.

So, solving the crime applies to an individual crime, and means the establishment (identification) of the circumstances of the crime and the person committing the act. In turn, the crime is usually expressed in percent the ratio of the number of crimes solved to the total number of registered crimes. Therefore, changes in the form of increase or decrease calculated in this way the clear-up rate in the state, the region, etc. for the period compared to the previous (for example, over the same period last year), and the comparison of these indicators in different regions for the same period has served for many years and present an indicator (criterion) of assessment of work of law enforcement bodies, including bodies performing operatively-search activity and investigation of crimes. The rehabilitation of the accused (suspect) in the course of preliminary investigations or of the defendant in court, in contrast, provide for the exclusion of this crime from the number disclosed, and, consequently, reduced crime detection.

It is generally accepted that criminological characteristics of crime and offences includes the status, dynamics, proportion, structure, clearance rate and other indicators, some of which will be used for the characterization of criminality in Russia.

So, according to official statistics in Russia for 2015 was 2388,5 thousand crimes (including in the Republic of Crimea – 27.8 thousand and Sevastopol – 8.3 thousand), which is 8.6% less than in the same period last year (hereinafter the same period last year) [2]. Thus for 2015 revealed 1238,7 thousand crimes (+ 5.3%) and not disclosed 1026,2 thousand crimes, which is 8.2% more than in the same period last year; remained unsolved 1.1 thousand murders and attempts at murder (– 6,7%), 2,7 thousand cases of deliberate infliction of grievous bodily harm (20.6 per cent), 597,2 thousand thefts (+ 10,2%), 28,9 thousand robberies (with 13.4%), 4 thousand assaults (of 11.3%), etc., 1004,1 thousand crimes (+ 8,5%) remained unsolved in connection with failure of the person subject to attraction as accused [2].

At the same time in 2010 it was 2628,8 thousand crimes, which is 12.2% less than in the same period last year) [3]. Thus for the year 2010 revealed 1431 thousand crimes (+ 13.3%) and not disclosed 1193,3 thousand of crimes remain unsolved 2.1 thousand murders and attempted murders (+ 4,0%), 6.2 thousand facts of deliberate causing of heavy harm of health (+ 15,7%), 709,2 thousand thefts (+ 6,4%), 95.5 thousand robberies (+ 23,1%), 8.9 thousand assaults (+ 20,7%), etc., 1163,3 thousand crimes (+ 8.7 per cent) remained unsolved in connection with an unidentified person, subject to attraction as the accused [3].

From these data it follows that for 2015 in comparison with 2010 is registered 240,3 thousand less crime, but as was noted above, there is a very large number of unsolved crimes, including unsolved and certain types of crime – murder and attempted murder, intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm, theft, robbery, robbery and others.

As you know many types of crime are characterized by high latency (corruption crimes, environmental crimes, etc.), and therefore, in official statistics estimates of domestic experts is recognised in respect of these criminal acts only one half (third) of the committed crimes.

Among the controversial issues in terms of crime detection is such, that all crimes under all circumstances may be disclosed. The majority of domestic scientists and practitioners believe that there can be crimes which it would be impossible to uncover. Proponents of this position believe that the crime remains unsolved, solely in connection with omissions of investigative activities and preliminary investigation, and above all in the mistakes and errors of the "human factor".

The author agrees with the scientific approach that the problem is complex and in order to improve the quality of crime require different actions:

1) organizational – improving the quality of vocational training of employees of operational units and carry out operational-investigative activity of internal Affairs bodies (hereinafter – MIA), Federal security service (hereinafter – FSB), Federal guard service (hereinafter – FSS), etc., investigators of the Investigative Committee, the FSB, police, investigators, police, border police, Federal security service, Federal bailiff service, etc.; effective monitoring by supervisors of these law enforcement agencies; use in production of operational search activities (further – ORM) and the investigation of special technical means, etc.;

2) regulatory and legal – the adoption of the new and improve existing criminal procedural and operational-investigative legislation, departmental normative acts on the issues of disclosure and investigation of crimes, production of new MPAS and investigative actions, use of special technical means, etc.;

3) methodical-technical – development and improvement of particular methods of detection and investigation of certain types of crimes, development of methods for the use of special technical means in the manufacture of MPAS and investigative actions (for example, polygraph), etc.

The author agrees with the scientific approach as an effective tool to be used to obtain substantial information about the involvement of specific individuals to the crime, is the use of the polygraph [4].

The polygraph is a special technical means used by employees of operatively-search divisions of the Department of internal Affairs, FSB, FSO, and other in the course of the relevant OPM, investigators and investigators in the preparation and production of certain investigative actions with participation of a specialist-polygraph examiner, and with the purpose of getting an accurate result for the subsequent justification of the prosecution of the perpetrator of the crime.

This technical device by recording and measuring physiological processes in the body of the subject when the survey allows you to determine the truth from a man or a lie. About the Respondent entity to the expert question leads to psychological stress and provokes a physiological arousal, and the polygraph physiological changes in these registers. Other issues the use of polygraph in the course of MPAS and preliminary investigations require independent research.

Thus, based on the comparison of criminological indicators on the state of crime and crime detection, and scientific approaches and the author's understanding of the article discusses about the criminological aspects of crime detection.

 

Literature:

 

1. See: Zhadan V. N. About the current crime situation in Russia and law enforcement / V. N. Zhadan // the Young scientist. – 2013. – N. 8. – P. 290-294; Zhadan V. N. Current issues of criminological characteristics of ecological crime / V. N. Zhadan // Young scientist. – 2013. – N. 4. – P. 387-393; Zhadan V. N. About corruption and criminological characteristics of corruption crimes / V. N. Zhadan // the Young scientist. – 2015. – N. 5. – P. 345-351; Corruption and crime [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://www.be5.biz/pravo/k003/19.htm (date accessed: 17.09.2016); Criminological characteristics and prevention of corruption [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://works.doklad.ru/view/of6oZ8p3-hg/2.html (date accessed: 17.09.2016); Criminological characteristics and prevention of organized crime [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://refleader.ru/jgebewyfsqasmer.html (date accessed: 17.09.2016); Criminological characteristics of economic crime and its prevention – [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://www.refbank.ru/crime/10/crime10.html (date accessed: 17.09.2016); Criminological characteristics and prevention of juvenile delinquency – [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://www.erudition.ru/referat/printref/id.28530_1.html (date accessed: 17.09.2016); Criminological characteristics and prevention of recidivism – [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://www.be5.biz/pravo/kkvv/12.htm (date accessed: 17.09.2016); Crime and detection of crime [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://2dip.ru/223284/(accessed: 17.09.2016); Statkus V. F. detection of crime is the most important tool in the fight against crime / V. F. Statkus // State and law. – 1998. – N. 4. – P. 66-73; Zhadan V. N. On the Criminogenic Situation in Russia and Its Significance to the Security of Citizens / V. N. Zhadan // World Applied Sciences Journal. – 2013. – 25 (4). – P. 664-668, etc.

2. The state of crime – January-December 2015 [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: https://μβδ.πτ/folder/101762/item/7087734/ (accessed: 17.09.2016).

3. The state of crime – January-December 2010 [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://cspkitraccc.skforussia.ru/view_news.php?id=665 (date accessed: 17.09.2016).

4. See: Gataullin Z. Sh., Zhadan V. N. Is it legal to the use of the polygraph in the course of investigations in cases of crimes of a terrorist nature? / Z. Sh. Gataullin, V. N. Zhadan // Russian investigator. – 2016. N. 9. – P. 3-6; Kitaev N. N. The results of the polygraph examination may not have the status of criminal procedure evidence / N. N. Kitaev // Russian investigator. – 2010. – N. 3. – P. 5-7; Komissarova Y. V. About the practice of using polygraph in criminal procedure of Russia / Y. V. Komissarova // Russian investigator. – 2008. – N. 12. – P. 36-37, etc.