Bryakotnin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Irkutsk national research technical university, Russia

Overall physical condition of student’s youth

Relevance of the research. In recent years the problem of public healthhas escalated in Russia. According to statistics the health of more than 50% of children became more impaired: the majority of children under the age of 14 years suffer from chronic diseases, only 10% of children who have graduated from school, can be classified as normal [1]. The incidence rate for children under the age of 14 years increased at 16 % and at 18% for children aged 15 to 17 years. In this context level of physical fitness of students became reduced [2]. This situation increases the urgency of the work to implement the monitoring studies of the physical fitness of young people in order to increase the effectiveness of physical training [3].

Monitoring of physical growth of children, adolescents, young people is a complex information and analytical process, involving monitoring of the condition of physical health of each individual and social group issuing results of the evaluation and prediction of physical health in the future, both for the person and for a group of people combined a territorial basis or the business occupation– the process of the observation of the object, the analysis of his health condition, of current events, warning of negative consequences.

Physical training is one of the most important components of human health. Scientists have observedit for a long time. Among the main physical indicators of monitoringstand out speed, endurance, strength, flexibility and agility.

The goal of the research is upgrading of management of physical training and improvementof quality based on the results of monitoring studies of the physical health of 70 students of 1-4 courses of the Popov Institute of Cybernetics of the National Research Irkutsk State Technical University in the period from 2010 to 2014 years.

Materials and methods. The results of monitoring observations of students in 2010-2014years were analyzed. The monitoring based on such physical parameters as agility, speed, endurance, strength, dynamic strength of muscles of the lower extremities and flexibility.

Key findings. The results of the level of overall physical condition of students are presented in Diagram 1-7.

It has been established that the parameter of speed and agility (shuttle run 10 * 5) has a different index over the years. As seen in Diagram 1, in 2010-2011 years, the characteristics of this index is 15,9 ± 0,1 sec. The dynamics of the data marked deterioration of results in this test. Thus, in the 2011-2012 academic year index decreased to 16,1 ± 0,1 sec., in 2012-2013 to 16,6 ± 0,2 sec., up to 16,7 ± 0,2 with. in 2013-2014.

Diagram1.Shuttlerun

As seen in Diagram 2, in 2010-2011 year, in the run 100m characteristic of this index is 14,3 ± 0,1 sec. In the 2011-2012 academic year index improved to 13,9 ± 0,1 sec.The following characteristics show deterioration of index in this test. Thus, in 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 academic years indicator deteriorated by 1.1 times and amounted to 14,1 ± 0,1 sec.

Diagram2.Run100m

The endurance index (run 1000m) has various characteristics over the years. In 2010-2011 years (Diagram 3) the characteristics of this index is 04:02,4 ± 0:0.35. The data dynamics noted that the indicator improved in the 2011-2012 academic year and was 03:57.0 ± 0:0.32, and then deteriorated. So in the 2012-2013 academic year, it was 04:01.7 ± 0:0.37, and in 2013-2014 04:03.4 ± 0:0.03.

Diagram3.Run1000m.

The force index (hang / pull-up) has different characteristics over the years. As seen in Diagram 4, in 2010-2011, the characteristics of this index is 9,4 ± 0,5 times. The dynamics of the data showed improvement in the 2011-2012 academic year to 10,5 ± 0,6 times, and in 2012-2013 to 10,9 ± 0,7 times. In the 2013-2014 academic year, noted the deterioration rate to 9,6 ± 0,6 times.

Diagram4.Hang/pull-up

The force index (situp) has approximately the same characteristics from year to year. As seen in Diagram 5, in 2010-2011, the characteristics of this index is 29,4 ± 0,2 times. The dynamics of the data indicated that the index remained at the same level as in the 2011-2012 academic year, it is 30,0 ± 0,5 times, in the 2012-2013 academic year, 29,9 ± 0,5 times, and in 2013- 2014 year- 29,4 ± 0,7 times.

Diagram5.Situp

The indicator of the dynamic forces of the lower limbs (standing jump) has different characteristics over the years. As seen in Diagram 6, in 2010-2011, the characteristic of this indicator was 233.0 ± 2 cm. The dynamics of the data showed improvement in the 2011-2012 academic year to 237.5 ± 2 cm.The following characteristics show deterioration of index in this test. So in the 2012-2013 academic year decreased to 234,0 ± 2,2 cm., and in 2013-2014 to 231,5 ± 2,7 cm.

Diagram6.Standing jump

The flexibility index (bending body / flexibility) has different characteristics over the years. As seen in Diagram 7, in 2010-2011, the property value of this indicator was 9.3 ± 1 cm. The dynamics of the data indicated that the rate remained at the same level. In the 2011-2012 academic year, accounting for 10,2 ± 0,9 cm, and in the 2012-2013 academic year, accounting for 10,1 ± 1,1 cm. In the 2013-2014 academic year has significantly declined to 3,5 ± 1 3 cm.

Diagram7.Bending body/flexibility

Conclusion. The important point is the constant attention to the use of modern information technology, specially developed author's programs of physical education to improve the health of young people by means of physical culture, as well as a variety of physical activity.Especially important is to master the technique of monitoring health outcomes for tests of physical development, physical and functional training with the further conclusion of the effectiveness of innovative solutions used in the educational process.

The graphs shows that in 2010-2011 had an average result for endurance index, strength and flexibility. The best result was achieved in the 2011-2012 academic year, and by the 2013-2014 school year rates declined. The index of speed and agility was the best in the 2010-2011 academicyear, and then gradually deteriorated. This indicates deterioration in the efficiency of physical training of students.

References:

1. Yurchenko O.V. Physical development and physical fitness of the system of monitoring the state of physical health //Fundamentalnyeisledovaniya. – 2012. – № 3 (2). – Pp. 324-327;

2. URL:www.rae.ru/section=content&op=show_article&article_id=982162

3. Izaak S.I. С.И. Monitoring of physical development and physical fitness of the theory and practice // Monograph. — M.: Sovetskii sport, 2005. — 196 p.

4. Gusev Y.A.Monitoring of physical development of students // Fundamentalnyenaukaipraktika. – 2010 - №1 – Pp. 9-11.