Mamina Î.Î.
The extraction of Suprastin from
biological material by amphiphilic solvent
Ukrainian National University of Pharmacy,t.Kharkov
For the
isolation of drugs of
the basic nature from
biological objects recommended methods of extraction by organic solvents, including quite
often used amphiphilic solvents. When
performing chemical-toxicological studies most commonly used amphiphilic
solvent – acetonitrile [1-3].
Suprastin and
some first-generation antihistamines can cause a substance abuse, heavy intoxication,
affect the central nervous system, respiratory system and disrupt the function
of the liver and kidneys. In severe cases of intoxication
antihistamine drugs perhaps
offensive coma and paralysis of respiratory center [2-4]. Due to the wide application
in medical practice Suprastin, its toxicity and the absence of systematic
research in the biological objects the development of methods of
chemical-toxicological analysis Suprastin is an actual task.
The aim of this work is to develop an algorithm of Suprastin analysis in biological
material consisting of effective methods of extraction by acetonitrile from liver tissue of dead animals, purification of extracts
from impurities and application of highly sensitive methods for identification
and quantification of Suprastin.
Materials
and method. The
prepared model mixture
10,0 g of liver tissue with 1000,0 μg Suprastin and a control sample was left for 24 h at room
temperature. After a day conducted investigation
according to developed technique acetonitrile extraction: to the model mixture added 10% solution hydrochloric
acid for destroying bonds "protein-substance" to pH 2,0-2,5 and extracted twice Suprastin-base by acetonitrile solvent
volumes – 25,0
and 10,0 ml for 10 minutes each
extraction.
For cleaning aqueous-acetonitrile extract was filtered through a paper
filter in the separating funnel with 70,0 ml of 2,5% solution sodium sulfate. The extraction of Suprastin-base was conducted twice using 10,0 ml chloroform at pH 2,0-2,5. The aqueous-acetonitrile extract pH 2,0-2,5 basified
with 25% solution ammonia to pH 9,0-10,0 by universal indicator paper and
extracted twice Suprastin-base by chloroform (portions -10,0 ml).
Chloroform extracts were purified
by extraction of impurities with hexane and TLC-method: chromatographic plates Sorbf³l PSTH-AF-A, the
system of
organ³c solvents
- ethylacetate-methanol-25% solution ammonia hydroxide (85:10:5), location reagent - Dragendorff's reagent for Mounier (sensitivity of location reagent -1,0-3,0 μg substance); Rf Suprastin = 0,60-0,63[5].
Quantitative determination of Suprastin carried out by UV spectrophotometric method
after extraction and TLC-purification. Optical density
values were measured on an SF-46, cell thickness 10 mm; λmax 312 ± 2
nm, reference solution - 0,1 M solution
of hydrochloric acid. Submission law Bouguer-Lambert-Beer is observed within
concentrations (5,0 – 35,0 μg / ml);
lower limit of detection (5,0 μg / ml). Suprastin concentration in solution was calculated from the
equation of the linear dependence of concentration (C, µg / ml) and absorbance (À) (Ñ = -0,018 + 0,024 À) [6]. Results of Suprastin extraction by acetonitrile from liver tissue presented in the Tab.
Table
Results of Suprastin extraction by acetonitrile from liver tissue (n = 5, Ð = 95%)
|
The method of quantitative
determination |
Allocated Suprastin, % |
Metrological characteristics, % |
|||||
|
|
S2 |
S |
S |
|
|
||
|
UV
spectro-photometric method |
56,6 – 64,8 |
60,7 |
3,96 |
1,99 |
0,89 |
2,47 |
4,07 |
Results: the extraction of
Suprastin by acetonitrile from biological material allows to determine – 60,7+
4,1% of the substance. Methods can be proposed for implementation in practice for forensic
medical examination and toxicology centers.
Conclusions:
1. The extraction of Suprastin by acetonitrile from the
liver of a corpse, purification of extracts with hexane and by thin-layer chromatography, quantitative determination of Suprastin by UV spectrophotometry were carried out.
2. The
extraction of Suprastin by acetonitrile from biological
material allows to determine – 60,7+ 4,1% of the substance.
References:
1. General methods for isolating
toxic and potent substances from biological material / B. G. Burchynsky, F.M.
Kahanovsky, K.I. Kahanovskaya, T.V. Hoholeva. - Odessa: Astroprint, 2010. - 44 p.
2. Mashkovsky, M.D. Medicines – Moscow:
LLC "Publishing House "New Wave", 2010.- 1216 p.
3. Clarke, E.J.C. Isolation and Identification of Drugs in
Pharmaceuticals, Body Fluids and Postmortem Material.- London: The Pharm.Press,
electronic version, 2005.
4. Secrets of Toxicology / Dzh. Ling L., R. F. Clark, T.B. Erickson, D.H.
Trestreyl. - Moscow: LLC "Publishing house" Binom", 2006. – 376 p.
5. The investigation of antihistamines by thin
layer chromatography / O.O. Mamina, A.M. Lebedin, E.L. Bondarenko, N.O. Shum //
XI Abstracts îf Scientific papers "The
issue of forensic medicine and expert practice" - Donetsk, 2013.-
P.101-102.
6. Lebedin, A.M.
The choice of optimal conditions of chloropyramine analysis by UV
spectrophotometry suitable for chemical-toxicological studies /A.M. Lebedin,
O.O. Mamina, L.I. Boryak // Collection of Scientific Papers of the employees
NMAPE named P.L. Shupik - 2012.- Vol. 21, ¹.4. - P. 313-318.