Экономика/8. Математические методы в экономике

 

Serkebayeva L.T

A.Baitursynov Kostanai State University, Kazakhstan

 

Poverty Assessment on the basis of the subsistence minimum

 

In Kazakhstan, officially accepted method for measuring absolute poverty on the basis of the subsistence minimum.

In accordance with the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan The living wage - is a necessary minimum cash income per person equal in magnitude to the minimum consumer basket and provides a person fulfilling the minimum requirements at the level adopted by society at this stage of development.

The cost of the minimum consumer basket includes the cost of the minimum food basket (70%) and the cost of non-food goods and services (30%). The cost of the minimum food basket is calculated monthly statistical authorities by multiplying the norms of food consumption (20 products) on the average prices prevailing on the middle of the month [1].

The living wage is for:

-          assessment of living standards and the definition of the poverty line;

-          identify areas of social policy and the implementation of measures for social support of the population;

-          study establishes minimum wage, pensions, allowances and other social benefits.

According to the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the subsistence level: Poverty line - border income required to meet the minimum needs of the person that is installed in the country depending on the economic opportunities and serves as a criterion for targeted social assistance to low-income population

The poverty line is determined quarterly on the country and by region in accordance with the procedure established by the Government, and more specifically the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare.

Indicators quantifying poverty

To assess the level of poverty and inequality in the country use indicators:

-the proportion of the population with incomes below the subsistence minimum and the food basket;

-depth and severity of poverty, the Gini coefficient, the differentiation of the population by income [2].

Poverty rates in Kostanai region in 2006-2010. are presented in Tables 1-2.

Table 1 shows the dynamics of the indicator "The share of low-income population."

 

Table 1 - The share of low-income population

Year

Proportion of population with incomes below the subsistence minimum

including

Proportion of population with income below the food basket

including

in urban areas

in rural areas

in urban areas

in rural areas

2006

14,0

4,4

24,9

2,7

0,1

5,6

2007

10,4

4,1

15,8

0,2

-

0,4

2008

9,0

5,2

12,3

0,8

0,5

1,0

2009

6,8

3,3

9,7

0,4

-

0,8

2010

6,4

2,6

10,6

0,5

0,2

0,8

 

Table 2 shows the dynamics of "Key indicators of poverty in urban and rural areas."

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2 – Key indicators of poverty in urban and rural areas

Year

The share

of the poor

depth of poverty

poverty severity

in urban areas

in rural areas

in urban areas

in rural areas

in urban areas

in rural areas

2006

4,4

24,9

0,9

6,4

0,3

2,3

2007

4,1

15,8

0,6

2,1

0,1

0,5

2008

5,2

12,3

0,9

1,7

0,3

0,5

2009

3,3

9,7

0,5

1,9

0,1

0,5

2010

2,6

10,6

0,3

1,7

0,1

0,5

 

We analyze the change in poverty rates in Kostanai region.

Judging by the pace of growth can be said that for this indicator in the period from 2006 to 2008 the rise, and from 2008 to 2010 is going to decline. Overall, from 2006 to 2010 the proportion of the population with incomes below the subsistence minimum in urban areas decreased 40.9%.

In the countryside, in the period from 2006 to 2009 observed a steady decline, and in 2010 a small increase. In general, the proportion of the population with incomes below the subsistence level in rural areas decreased by 57.4%.

Analyzing the basic rate of growth in terms of "depth of poverty" can formulate the following conclusions:

-          depth of poverty in the urban area as a whole for the analyzed period decreased by 66.7%;

-          the depth of poverty in rural areas and for the period under review decreased by 73.4%

Considering the chain growth rate in terms of "depth of poverty", shown in Figure 16, we can say that the depth of poverty in urban areas in 2008 increased compared with 2007, while in rural areas there is a slight increase in 2009 compared with 2008.

 

Picture 1 – Chain growth rate in terms of "depth of poverty"

 

Picture 2 is a block diagram indicator "Proportion of population with incomes below the subsistence minimum, depending on the size of the family"

 

 

Picture 2 – Block diagram of the share of the population with incomes below the subsistence minimum, depending on the size of the household

 

Analyzing the structure diagram, we see that the largest share of the population with incomes below the subsistence minimum account for households of 5 or more persons. Moreover, the basic growth rates show that in the analyzed period, this indicator increases, the increase was 16.1%.

Analyzing indicator "Proportion of population with income below the cost of the food basket, depending on the size of the household, we see that the largest share of the population with incomes below the food basket also accounts for households of 5 or more persons. Moreover, the basic growth rates show that in the analyzed period, this indicator increases, an increase of 52.9%.

 

 

Literature:

1.   www.stat.kz - Агентство Республики Казахстан по статистике. Организация обследования и анализ уровня жизни населения в Казахстане.

2.   Республика Казахстан: оценка системы адресной социальной помощи. Заключительный отчет. Достойный труд: комплексный подход к социальной сфере в Казахстане. Астана, 2003.Международное бюро труда, 2004.

3.   Ю.Н. Тюрин, А.А. Макаров. Статистический анализ данных на компьютере / Под ред. В.Э. Фигурнова — М.: ИНФРА–М, 1998. — 528 с.

4.   «Уровень жизни населения Костанайской области» Статистический сборник/ 2011 – 68с. Под редакцией К.Баримбекова