Valery V. Mykhaylenko, D.Sc.
Chernivtsi, Ukraine
ELSP CLASS: MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE THEORY
Abstract: Teaching ELSP is a challenge for the instructor and the student. They
must support each other in the learning and cognition process, in the process
of comprehending Economics will actualizes using English as an instrument and
expand their English competence.The use of the MIT theory will actualize
students’ economics competence. .An algorithm of developing students’ knowledge
of economics and English competence.
Key words: ELSP, Economics majors, creative approach,
economics, double degree.
Resume: Ïðåïîäàâàíèå àíãëèéñêîãî ÿçûêà äëÿ
ñïåöèàëüíûõ öåëåé – âûçîâ äëÿ ïðåïîäàâàòåëÿ è ñòóäåíòà. Îíè äîëæíû ïîääåðæèâàòü
äðóã äðóãà äëÿ ïîçíàíèÿ â äàííîì ñëó÷àå
ýêîíîìèêè ïîñðåäñòâîì àíãëèéñêîãî ÿçûêà. Èñïîëüçîâàíèå òåîðèè ìíîæåñòâà
ñïîñîáíîñòåé ñòóäåíòà àêòèâèðóåò âåðáàëèçàöèþ ýêîíîìè÷åñêèõ çíàíèé.
Ïðåäëàãàåòñÿ àëãîðèòì ðàáîòû ïî óãëóáëåíèþ è ðàñøèðåíèþ çíàíèé àíãëèéñêîãî äëÿ
ñòóäåíòîâ-ýêîíîìèñòîâ.
Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà:
àíãëèéñêèé äëÿ ýêîíîìèñòîâ, òâîð÷åñêèé ïîäõîä, òåîðèÿ ìíîæåñòâà ñïîñîáíîñòåé,
ïîçíàíèå, êîììóíèêàöèÿ, êîìïåòåíöèÿ, âëàäåíèå.
Teaching is changing and, in many ways, becoming a
more difficult job because of increasingly numerous contradictory expectations. Students and teachers
have unclear, and often inconsistent, expectations of technology use. Any ELSP
instructor happens to meet the following challenges: tools for thinking teachers; educating university
instructors; the innovative ELSP
methodology; intercultural awareness
and competence; cultural differences and challenges; discursive analysis and
checking action projects; using a hands-on approach strategy to improve the
language learning environment for undergraduates; learning problem solving with
digital media; using a universal course design to help students succeed in the
host university; encouraging collaborative learning in an American/British/Canadian
cultural studies module; looking for factors influencing the use of e-learning
training between students; applying the effects of communication studies on the
use of learning styles by freshman
students; individual student learning differences. At the beginning of the
millennium the society understood that lopsided education of school children and
university sudents may lead the country to a blind ally. So the challenge to bring
up all-round educated young generation was verbalized. Howard Gardner first
published Frames of Mind: The Theory
of Multiple Intelligences in 1983, educators have been applying his
theory in their classrooms since [1; 2]. Howard Gardner's TMI developed
as he worked with brain injured adults and autistic children.. He specified eight distinct abilities that he referred to as "intelligences":
verbal-linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical,
interpersonal, intrapersonal, and the naturalist.
In addition to the biological
basis for these intelligences, H.Gardner
also placed great emphasis on
cultural influences that may impact the development of each intelligence. Just as Howard Gardner maintained
that each person has a unique cognitive profile, so too have educators shown
that there is no single preferred multiple intelligences model. Individual
teachers and entire schools implemented the theory, making it the basis of
their mission statements and curriculums.
To overcome the instructors’ perplexity we would like to share
some experience in applying the Theory
of Multiple Intelligences in the University freshmen’s ELSP class for economics majors within the first
semester.
As an experimental class it calls for unusual
flexibility, independence, dedication, and creativity. It is expected that every student will complete several
major projects along with regular class particiption (blogs, presentations,
short analysis papers, etc.) [see also: 4]. After introductions, we can
talk about the experimental nature of the class, possibilities for
presentations, projects, and a possibility to make a better carrier with
their high competence of English inside and outside the country.
Each person has a different intellectual composition. We can improve education by
addressing the multiple intelligences of our students. These intelligences are located in different areas of the brain and can either work independently or
together. Multiple
intelligences can be nurtured and strengthened, or ignored and weakened. Each individual has nine
intelligences (and maybe more to be discovered) If a studen's intelligence can be identified, then insructors can accommodate different students
successfully according to their
orientation to learning. Instructors
in traditional classrooms primarily teach the verbal/linguistic and mathematical/logical intelligences mainly. The
nine intelligences are:
1.VISUAL/SPATIAL – students who learn best visually and organizing
things spatially. They like to
see what you are talking about in order to understand. They enjoy charts, graphs, maps, tables,
illustrations, art, puzzles, costumes - anything eye catching. The conveying of
language and literature has always involved technology, as far back in time as
the music, masks, and performance materials that supplimented oral story
telling and early drama. In this frame the students can be good ‘word
players’.
The instructor may, for instance, ask students to play the role of David Ricard, a British political economist and give
systematized, classical form to the rising science
of economics
in the 19th
century or ask them to play the role of Margaret
Thatcher, the only British
prime minister in the 20th century to win three consecutive terms who accelerated the evolution of the British economy
from statism to liberalism, present her innovations in economy.
2. VERBAL/LINGUISTIC – students who demonstrate strength in the language arts: speaking, writing, reading, listening. These students have always been successful
in traditional classrooms because their intelligence lends itself to
traditional teaching. The students can be good ‘questioners’. The
trainer may organize the question hour at the Parliament or debates on some
innovations in the economy system, ‘spelling be’ competitions, or word building
competitions, or paraphrasing new words.
3. MATHEMATICAL/LOGICAL - students who display an aptitude for
numbers, reasoning and problem solving. This is the other half of the students
who typically do well in traditional classrooms where teaching is logically
sequenced and students are asked to conform.
Such students can be good ‘visualisers.’ The trainer may ask them to
formalize (encode) some economic laws, definitions or decode their formulae.
4. BODILY/KINESTHETIC - students who
experience learning best through activity: games, movement, hands-on tasks,
building. These students were often labeled "overly active" in
traditional classrooms where they were told to sit and be still! Such students can
be good ‘movers’ and they are the best at pantomime. The trainer may ask one
group to pantomime some text, for instance, banking transaction, trading, etc.
and the other group to verbalize it.
5. INTRAPERSONAL - students who
are especially in touch with their own feelings, values, and ideas. They may
tend to be more reserved, but they are actually quite intuitive about what they
learn and how it relates to themselves. Such
students can be called ‘loners’ and they are good at making speeches. The
trainer may ask them to present one the same speech in different modes: happy,
sad, proud, shy, moderate, etc.
6. INTERPERSONAL - students who are noticeably people oriented and
outgoing, and do their learning cooperatively in groups or with a partner.
These students may have typically been identified as "talkative" or
" too concerned about being social" in a traditional setting. Such
students can be called ‘socializers’
and they are good at organizing discussions. The trainer may ask them to
organize discussions of the company’s annual plan in small groups (departments)
first and then at the in the large group (shareholders’ meeting).
7. NATURALIST - students who love the outdoors, animals, field trips.
More than this, though, these students love to pick up on subtle differences in
meanings. The traditional classroom has not been accommodating to these
children. Such students are called “nature lover”, they can share their
nature loving with others. The trainer can ask them to initiate some
environmentalists’ campaigns or survey the influence of new legislature on the
nature.
8. EXISTENTIALIST - students who learn in the context of where humankind
stands in the "big picture" of existence. They ask "Why are we
here?" and "What is our role in the world?" Such students are
called ‘cognitivists’, they can fully investigate the object and find its place
in the world view. The trainer may ask them to map the ‘economy’ fragment of
the world view and then to verbalize it.
9. MUSICAL/RHYTHMIC - students who learn well
through songs, patterns, rhythms, instruments and musical expression. It is
easy to overlook students with this intelligence in traditional education. These
students can be called ‘music
lovers’
and they enjoy putting any text into music. The students would love, for
instance, to match advertizing of various goods and services with various
pieces of music to make them more attractive.In the process of advertizing
students can reveal all the types of intelligence. Everyone has some of each of all the intelligences,
but in different students one (or more) is
more pronounced.
During the 2008-2009, 2009-2010, and
2013-2014 academic years an action research project was undertaken in my class
to assess the effects of this multimodal learning format. A daily trainer’s
journal was kept with specific entries recording the following:
general weekly comments
a
weekly evaluation of how focused or
"on-task" students were
an evaluation of the transitions between types of intelligence
a self-assessment – how the teacher’s time was used.
The students were also asked to present their weekly essay commenting or
initiating their activities on the
topic [see also: 3].
Dr. Gardner says that modern schools
and culture focus most of their attention on linguistic and
logical-mathematical intelligence. We esteem the highly articulate or logical
people of our culture. However, he says that we should also place equal
attention on individuals who show gifts in the other intelligences: the
artists, architects, musicians, naturalists, designers, dancers, therapists,
entrepreneurs, and others who enrich the world in which we live. Unfortunately,
many students who have these gifts do not receive much reinforcement for them
in the classroom. Their unique ways of thinking and learning were not addressed
by a heavily linguistic or logical-mathematical classroom.
The present challenge is to disseminate
one’s experience and enthusiasm among many more instructors, administrators,
and others who work with students, primarily through workshops and publications,
so that each student has the opportunity to learn in ways harmonious with their
unique minds [cf.: 5, 9-50].
The research data revealed the
following:
1. The students develop increased responsibility,
self-direction and independence over the course of the year.
Although no attempt was made to compare this group of students with those in
other third grade classes, the self-direction and motivation of these students
was apparent to numerous classroom visitors. The students became skilled at
developing their own projects, gathering the necessary resources and materials,
and making well-planned presentations of all kinds.
2. Students previously
identified as not participating in the class work showed rapid improvement
during the first three weeks of the semester. By mid-year, they were making
important contributions to their groups.
3. All students developed and applied new skills.
In the fall, most students described only one center as their
"favorite" and as the one where they felt confident. (The
distribution among the nine centers was relatively even.) By mid-year, most
identified three to four favorite centers. Moreover, they were all making
multimodal presentations of independent projects including group participation
activities.
4. Cooperative learning skills improved in all students.
Since so much of the work was collaborative, students became highly skilled at
listening, helping each other, sharing leadership in different activities,
accommodating group changes. They learned not only to respect each other, but
also to appreciate and call upon the unique gifts and abilities of their
classmates.
5. Academic achievement improved. Standardized
test scores were above university averages in all areas. Retention was high on
a classroom year-end test of all areas studied during the year.. Students, who
had previously been unsuccessful in learning English have become high
achievers.
Investigating my methodology and receiving a
feedback from graduates I consider that a double major in English and Economics
will be valuable in the students’ future career in /Banking /Marketing /Management
/Taxation /
Taxation /Finance /Advertizing. The MIT and an elaborated
teaching algorithm help them think critically about the businesses as well as in
Communication/Creative Writing/Pr. Their English degree will give them the
education to pursue a broad range of opportunities, and a pass to the top-tier
organizations." In Ukraine there is a strong desire on the students’ part
as well as EFL/ELSP instructors’ to transform the ESL syllabus into the English
degree as a part of their double degree.
References
1. Gardner Howard. Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in
Practice / Howard Gardner - New York: Basic Books, 1993. –304 p.
2. Gardner Howard. Frames of Mind:
The Theory of Multiple Intelligences .3-rd Edition / Howard
Gardner. -New York:
Basic Books, 2011. –528 p.
3. Glennan Thomas K., Jr., Melmed Arthur .Fostering the Use of Educational Technology /
Thomas K. Glennan, Jr., Arthur Melmed. - Santa Monica, CA.: Rand Publishing,
1996. –151 p.
4. Harmer Jeremy. The Practice of English Language Teaching / Jeremy
Harmer.
-Edinburgh Gate, Harlow: Longman, 2001.—384 p.
5. Spirovska Elena.
Integrating Multiple
Intelligences in Teaching English as a Foreign Language - Seeu Experiences and
Practices
/
Elena Spirovska // South East European University Review. – 2013. – Vol.
9. - Issue 1. – Pp. 9–20.