Turymbetov T.A1., Aitkulov A.U1., Azhikhanov N.T2., Aimeshov Zh.A2.

1Caspian State University of Technologies and Engineering named after                   Sh. Yessenov, Kazakhstan

2Kh.Yasavi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Kazakhstan

 

Evaluation of a slight increase of the well production rate in the application of technological operation to improve the condition of fluid filtration

 

         In the process of oil production at operation of oil fields for increase production of oil from wells used the most intensive methods of influence in the form of hydraulic fracturing in the near-wellbore zone, by injecting fluids into the formation to fracture the reservoir in order to create a specific canal, in the form of cracks. Geological-based research in the fields of origin shows varying degrees of technological efficiency due to the state of cracks in the near-wellbore zone [1]. Efficiency created fractures substantiates value of the minimum well production by fluid after hydraulic fracture. Therefore, before doing so, its technological efficiency should be estimated [2].  In this regard, below given technology of calculation formulas for determining the lower limit debit wells by liquid.  

To determine the lower limit debit wells use the following consideration. If in filtration flow, which will be held in the reservoir (see Fig. 1a) in any way to put an impenetrable barrier (see Fig. 1b), and the pressure drop Ðê-Ðñ remains unchanged, then it leads to a reduction in flow rate or, in extreme cases when the direction of the partition coincides with the direction of the streamlines, flow rate will remain unchanged.

Fig. 1. Scheme flow in a reservoir with and without baffles.

 

In this case, to determine the undersized debits (low flow rate) mentally put impenetrable infinitely thin walls as shown in figure 2.

Fig. 2. Diagram of an oil reservoir with the sloping baffle and crack.

 

With this arrangement of impermeable baffles, all the liquid will flow into the well only through the horizontal cracks.

For simplicity, we assume that the crack is located in the middle of the thickness of the formation. Therefore, in view of the symmetry can be seen only half the flow shown in figure 2.

In the interval Rî≤r≤ Rê ,  fluid flow lines are directed horizontally. And in the interval rñ ≤ r ≤ Rî streamlines of fluid flow from the baffle until the crack are directed parallel to the generators of the cone ÀÂÑD at cracks from the reservoir until cone ÅÂÑF – parallel from to the axis of the hole and the surface of the cone ÅÂÑF until borehole walls - horizontally (see fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Diagram of the cut half the thickness of the producing formation with crack and are sloping  septums

 

To define the elementary (basic) inflow dq between two infinitely close baffles (see fig. 3) [3]:

                           ;                                                    (1)

where  – tributary of the horizontal member of the formation thickness dy to an element of the conical the formation;

   inflow from an element of the conical the formation to the fracture;

 – inflow from an element the annular the formation to the surface of the cone ÅÂÑF;

 – inflow from a horizontal circular formation to wells;

At that Ðê,Ð1, Ð2, Ð3  and  Ðñ – respectively the pressure on the power supply contour, at the points indicated in figure 3 and the bottom hole.

         Substituting the values ​​of dq1, dq2, dq3, dq4 an obtaining fluid influx into the wellbore from the reservoir thickness   (Fig. 3):

             (2)

         Practice shows that the fracturing, the value of the crack opening δ, come much smaller thickness the reservoir h, i.å.  h>>δ. This allows without (great) measure of accuracy to assume that the value debit (of the well flow) shown in Figure 4 equal

              (3)

where                                (4)

         Debit qî less than actual debits (flow rate) of the well and in what follows we denote qî=qí (bottom boundary).

         The relative increase qí compared to the debits (flow rate) of the well qc before the formation of cracks is determined by the following relationship

            (5)

         For existing wells Ñ=0. As indicated in the work [4], if  Z2>5 formulas (4) and (5) greatly simplified, as this

                                                                   (6)

         With allowance for equality (6), the bottom boundary of debit the well qí and  its relative increase φí are defined respectively by the following formulas:

                     ,                                      (7)

                    .                              (8)

          The results of calculations for φí make sense, of course with φí≥1. Then the minimum value of the relative increase well production (φí) according to the formula (8) will have a value

The average value of the research a parameter equal  

         Numerical calculations were carried out and graphs depending φ on Ro for different values ​​of δ the formation of horizontal cracks were built (Fig. 4). 

Fig. 4. Relationship between φí  and  φâ from  Ro  by  Ê1 = 0,25 mkm2 under conditions of the formation of horizontal cracks

 

From the obtained results shown in figure 1, it could be seen that the change in technological efficiency at formation of horizontal cracks depends on the distribution radius and crack opening. Therefore, among two factors, the degree of openness of horizontal cracks more actively increases the production rate of the well. Increasing the radius of the horizontal crack reduces the growth rate of increment in flow rate of the well. It will be observed minimal change in flow rate of the well mostly depends on the geometric dimensions of the horizontal cracks and parameters filtration of the porous block and artificially formed horizontal cracks. Calculations indicates that the permeability at pore space of 0.25 mkm2 and respectively radius, and also discloses a horizontal crack 100 m and 1 mm minimally debit wells increases by 1.8 times.

 

                                    References:

1. Bocharov B.A. On the joint development of oil reservoirs (in order of discussion). Oil Industry. "2003. 11. p. 55-58.

2.  Zhumagulov B.T., Azhikhanov N.T., Kuatbekov B.N., Temirov B.M. Numerical solutions of the three-dimensional problem of filtration in a nonhomogeneous porous medium // Series of essential technical sciences. - 2005. 3. p. 221-224.

3. Shchelkachev B.N. Fundamentals of application and theory of unsteady filtration. M .: Oil and Gas, 1995. Part I. 586 p., Part II.- 493 p.

4. Aitkulov A.U. Fundamentals of underground hydromechanics and development of oil fields. Almaty. 2003. 337 p.