ADVERBS WITH
WORD FORMATIVE SUFFIX ELEMENTS -È-,
-Ó-, -Þ- IN THE
MODERN UKRAINIAN LITERARY LANGUAGE
J. O Komlyk, senior teacher
Poltava National Technical
Yuri Kondratyuk Univtrsity
The article is devoted to peculiar features of
forming the lexico-grammatical class of adverbs with the help of
single-component vocal suffixes. Sufficient attention is paid to the
distributive characteristics of these suffixes and to their productiveness
within inflexible notional words (contentives).
The
Ukrainian language, thanks to its long-lasting development, has acquired the
strict phonetic and grammar systems, well-regulated expression means. One of
its characteristic features at all stages of its formation has been “continuous
change in the parts of speech system, particularly transformation of words and
word forms belonging to other parts of speech into adverbs” [4, p.33].
It’s
worth mentioning, that in the Ukrainian linguistics the problem of strict
separation and dividing words into lexico-grammatical classes has been studied
thoroughly enough. Naturally, the adverb, as part of speech “integrating in
itself the class of words, having a general category meaning of the non-process
action or state attribute, other non-process attribute or thing” [7, p.399] was
not deprived of the linguists’ interest, among them being I.P.Vykhovanets [2],
K.G.Gorodenska [3], I.M.Uzdygan [7], I.K.Chaplya [9], G.M.Yarun [10] and many
others.
In
their research works (monographs, manuals, articles etc.) the authors select
this lexico-grammatical category as subject to analyzing semantic and
functional characteristics (primarily causal [5, p.34-39], locative [6,
p.77-87] adverb groups and their morphological and syntax peculiarities [1,
p.34-39].
Meanwhile,
the linguists’ attention is concentrated on studying purely grammar aspects of
these inflexible contentives, whereas the problem of phonomorphological features
of the adverb’s morphemic structure has not been finally clarified yet, thus
causing the topicality of the present study.
Adverbs
belong to the lexico-grammatical class of inflexible contentives, which,
possessing no morphological paradigm, are characterized by their morphemic
structure diversity, component and structural patchiness. They have been
replenished for ages due to innovations based on practically all notional parts
of speech with the help of various word-forming elements – prefixes, suffixes
and confixes. We define the confix as “a word-forming element providing the
unity of the prefix with other morphemes (suffix, postfix) simultaneously used
in the word formation process” [8, p.253].
The
most productive elements in adverbs structure, to our opinion, are
single-component suffixes, which are associated with a single vowel phoneme and
can have various orthographic layers of expression. It is for that reason, that
features of several single-phoneme suffixes (-è-; - ó-;
-þ-) have been selected
as the subject to be analyzed. These suffixes are represented by the vowels -ó- and -è- in adverbs.
Our
basic attention is emphasized on these very suffixes and their distributive
features, irrespective of the suffixal or suffixal-prefixal method of word
formation. We considered it reasonable to determine these affixes’
productiveness in adverbs and the positions, where these meaningful parts of
word most frequently occur. It should be mentioned, that we didn’t set it our
goal to characterize the prefixal formants, helping to form adverbs together
with single-component vocal suffixes.
The
material of the present study was taken from the handbook dictionary “Morphemic
Analysis” by I.T.Yatsenko [11], comprising over 117 thousand lexical units.
Using
the overall sampling method we have selected and analyzed 417 adverbs,
comprising in their structure single-phoneme suffixes, formed by vowels -è- and -ó-.
Hypothetically,
one suffix group integrated single-phoneme structural elements, having several
layers of orthographic expression. For example, phonologically similar
suffixes, to our mind, are suffixes -ó-, -þ- (äîñõî÷ó,
ïîï³äòèííþ), because they are associated with one and the same phoneme I-ó-I.
As a
result of the study, three word-forming groups of adverbs have been classified.
In their structure single-phoneme suffixes -è-, -ó-, -þ-, represented by vowels è, ó, were easily identified.
Among
the determined word formative categories, the most widespread is the one,
containing the derivative suffix -è-, e.g. ïî-óêðà¿íñüêè. The total of 291
lexemes have been selected, thus making 61.7% of all the analyzed adverbs. It
is significant, that suffix -è- occurs more frequently after the root ending in a
consonant phoneme (e.g. âîñåíè îñ³íü;
ùîñèëè ñèëà; ïîâ³êè â³ê).
The
phonetic picture of prepositional suffixes is rather variable and presents an
interesting material for research observations. We mean the nature of consonant
prepositional suffixes, i.e. purely distributive features of combinatory power
of vocal suffix -è-, which is productive enough after a suffix,
represented by a consonant, e.g. ïîõàïêè (derivative of õàïàòè + ê + è); öàïêè
(denominative
of öàï + ê + è); òóòêè (derivative of òóò + ê + è).
We
consider it interesting, that suffix -è- can participate in forming adverbs together with
several derivative suffixal elements.
It
should be mentioned, that the most peculiar position of suffix -è- is when it is
located after another suffix (152 cases – 34.3%): ïî-ãðåöüêè,
äèÿâîëüñüêè, ïî-çâ³ðñüêè. Sometimes two
suffixes may occur before it (50 cases – 17.1%): ïî-àâñòð³éñüêè,
ïî-ä³ä³âñüêè, ïî-³íä³éñüêè. In very rare cases one can find three (ïî-ðåì³ñíèöüêè, ïî-çëèäíÿöüêè), four ( ïî-÷èíîâíèöüêè) and five (ñòðàæäàëüíèöüêè) suffixes in
preposition to suffix -è-. In this connection 10, 3 and
1 lexical unit has been detected, making 3.4%, 1% and 0.3% respectively of the
total amount of adverbs possessing suffix -è-. Directly after the root this suffix occurs twice
less frequently (75 cases – 25.76%), than after another suffix (one or
several). For example: ùîäîáè, ïî-³íäè÷è, äîêóïè.
As to
the presence of prefixes, the most frequent is the model with a single prefix
(228 cases – 78.3%): ïî-âàðøàâñüêè, í³òð³øêè,
ïî-³ñïàíñüêè, ïî-âîâ÷è; less frequently it occurs without a prefix (43 cases –
14.7%): ã³ãàíòñüêè, âåðõè, ðàáñüêè; quite rarely – with two
prefixes (20 cases – 6.8%): çíåòÿìè, ïîâñþäè. Sometimes the model with an
interfix occurs (6 cases – 2%), e.g. ïî-çëîä³éñüêè.
Suffix -è- is most frequently
met after breath consonants (247 cases): ïî-õàçÿéñüêè,
àí³òðîõè, ïî-ñîáà÷è. It
makes 84.8% of all the amount of adverbs possessing the given suffix. Much more
rarely it is used after sonorants (26 cases): ùîçèìè,
â³äêîëè, ùîâåñíè, thus
making 8.9%. Suffix -è- is minimally used after sonants (18 cases – 6.1%),
e.g. íàâêðóãè, áîçíà-êóäè.
Adverbs
are known to be derived from all other notional parts of speech (contentives).
Here we should remark, that such adverbs preserve “association with the parts
of speech they have been historically derived from. Adverbs have peculiar word
formative structure. Their bases end in suffixes homonymous to case-endings of
this or that part of speech…” [3, p.118].
Suffix -è- is the most widely
represented in adverbs of the attributive origin (154 cases – 52.9%), e.g. ïî-áðàòåðñüêè, ïî-êðóò³éñüêè, ïî-÷åðíå÷è; less frequently
adverbs of the noun origin occur (53 cases – 18.2%): ïîï³äðóêè, ïîòàéêè, ùîí³÷åíüêè; those of the pronoun origin
(34 cases – 11.6%): òóòåíüêè, çàâæäè; of the verb origin (31 case – 10.6%): óñêîêè, äèáêè; adverbs with several bases (19 cases – 6.5%): ïî-ñòàðîñâ³òñüêè, ñóõîâåðøêè (see details in Table 1).
Table 1
Productiveness features of the adverbial suffixes -è-, -ó-, -þ-
|
Suffix |
Origin Base |
Total |
||||||||||||
|
Attribute number |
Noun number |
Verb number |
Pronoun number |
Numeral number |
Several bases |
|||||||||
|
abs. |
rel. |
abs. |
rel. |
abs. |
rel. |
abs. |
rel. |
abs. |
rel. |
abs. |
rel. |
abs. |
rel. |
|
|
-è- |
154 |
52.9 |
53 |
18.2 |
31 |
10.6 |
34 |
11.6 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
6.5 |
291 |
99.8 |
|
-ó- |
40 |
24.09 |
91 |
54.8 |
20 |
12.04 |
2 |
1.2 |
2 |
1.2 |
11 |
6.6 |
166 |
99.93 |
|
-þ- |
|
7.1 |
9 |
64.2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
14.2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
14.2 |
14 |
99.7 |
Suffix -ó- participates in forming the total of 166 adverbs, and
its orthographic variant -þ- only participates in 14 cases.
Model
+ -ó- (root + suffix -ó-) occurs in 99 adverb formations, making 59.6%, e.g. äîâåðõó, âíèçó, ïîíàäì³ðó, íà÷èñòîòó.
Model
+ -þ- (root + suffix -þ) is only used in 13
words (92.8%), e.g. óâîëþ, ïîï³äâ³êîííþ.
Interestingly,
that suffix -ó- is most frequently used after other suffixes.
Numerically, it is expressed as follows:
Model
^-ó- occurs in 63 cases, making
37.9%:
Ïîðàíåíüêó, â³äìàëêó, óïåðåá³æêó.
Model
^^-ó-occurs in 5 words,
making 3%:
Ñïî÷àòêó, óñóõîì’ÿòêó.
Such
models are not specific to the formation of adverbs with suffix -þ-. The only word
containing one more suffix before -þ- has been found: ïîâí³ñòþ.
In
adverbs suffix -þ- is most frequently used after a breath consonant (95
cases – 57/2%): ïîëåãåíüêó, ïîòðîõó, äîñòîòó; less frequently it
occurs after a sonorant (42 cases – 25.3%): âòåìíó,
ïîòîìó and quite rarely it
is used after a sonant (31 case – 18.6%):
ïîáëèçó. Suffix -þ- occurs in somewhat different
order: after a sonorant (8 cases – 57.1%): ïîï³äòèííþ; after a breath consonant (5
adverbs – 35.7%): ñèëîì³ööþ; and after a sonant
(1 word – 7.1%): çàì³ææþ.
The
most typical for the both suffixes is their affixing to the noun base,
respectively: with -ó- – 91 adverb (54.8%): íåâïàì’ÿòêó, ñêðàº÷êó, óñë³ïó, óë³òêó; with -þ- – 9 adverbs (64.2%): ïîâí³ñòþ; attributive base
with suffix -ó- –40 cases (24%): çìîëîäó, ïîìàëåíüêó, çäàâíó; with -þ- – 1 adverb (7.1%): ïîâí³ñòþ; verbal base with
suffix -ó- – 20 cases (12%): ñïîõâàòó, äîñõî÷ó; numerical base – 2 adverbs
(1.2%): ñïåðøó. Adverbs with suffix -þ- are not formed by two
derivative bases. The pronoun base occurs in two lexical units with suffixes -ó- and -þ-, respectively: ïðè÷îìó, óí³÷èþ. Several bases also form adverbs with suffixes -ó- – 11 cases (6.6%), -þ- – 2 cases (14.2%),
respectively: ñïåðâîâ³êó, ñèëîì³ööþ (see Tab.1).
As it
is seen, studying of only separate word formative elements of adverbs (suffixes
-è-,-ó-,-þ-) clarifies peculiarities of
this lexico-grammatical category and its exceptional phonetic and morphological
potential as that of the notional part of speech.
References
1.
O.V.Bolyukh. Morphological and syntax features of the adverb //
Movoznavstvo. – 1994.–No.6.–P.34–39.
2.
I.R.Vykhovanets et al. Theoretic morphology of the Ukrainian Language / under
the editorship of I.R.Vykhovanets. – K.: Pulsary, 2004. – P.298–3234.
3.
K.G.Gorodenska. Adverb // Ukrainian Grammar / under the editorship of
A/P/Gryshchenko. – K.: Radyanska Shkola, 1982.–P.118–123.
4.
G.M.Mukan. Morphological structure and methods of adverbs formation//
Ukrayinska mova i literatura v shkoli.-1983.–No.10.–P.33–37.
5.
T.I.Nikolashina. Semantic and functional characteristics of causal
adverbs in the Ukrainian language // Problems of the Ukrainian language and
methodology. Interuniversity research works selection / Slovyansk State Pedagogical
Institute. – Slovyansk, 1997.–P.34–39.
6.
T.I.Nikilashina. Semantic characteristics of local semantics adverbs in
modern Ukrainian // Ukrainian Grammar in the Functional Aspect: Research works
selection / Poltava Korolenko Teachers Training University. – Poltava,
2000.–P.77–87.
7.
I.M.Uzdygan. Adverb // Modern Literary Ukrainian: Manual / under the
editorship of A.P.Gryshchenko.– Vyshcha Shkola, 2002.–P.399–407.
8.
The Ukrainian Language. Encyclopedia / V.M.Rusanivsky, O.O.Taranenko,
M.P.Zyablyuk et al. – K.:Ukrayinska entsiklopedia, 2000. – P.789.
9.
I.K.Chaplya. Adverbs in Ukrainian. – Kh.: Kharkiv State University,
1960. – 123p.
10. G.M.Yarun. The form
and content correlation in the Ukrainian adverbial system development / The
Ukrainian Academy of Sciences; Potebnya Linguistics Institute. – K.: Naukova
Dumka, 1993. – 111p.
11. I.T.Yatsenko.
Handbook Dictionary. Morphemic Analysis: in 2 volumes – K.: Vyshcha Shkola,
1980–1981.–707p.