Ýêîíîìè÷åñêèå íàóêè / 13. Ðåãèîíàëüíàÿ ýêîíîìèêà
Cherednichenko I.G.
Public
institution “Institute of environmental economics and sustainable development
of national academy of sciences of Ukraine”, Ukraine
The sustainable development of water
treatment and disposal systems: Problems and prospects
Last year the UN Decade for
Action “Water for Life” expired. It was
not the first international program, the goal of which was to have the grabbed
world attention to water problems. The summary report ‘Water for Sustainable
Development” says that before the year 2015 the share of human beings without
continuous access to clean drinking water decreased in 2 times, and at present
56% of the world population enjoys the high level of water supply. At the same
time, more than 700m people have no direct access to the sources of drinking
water. Around 80% of the waste products in developing countries are still
stewed in rivers, whereas 1 liter of the waste product pollutes up to 8 liters
of clean water in its source. The practice of water purification for its reuse
has not become a strategy for managerial decisions, even in the developed
countries of the world. In order to organize the world, wherein the dignity of
every person is respected, it is planned to develop a framework program for the
period from 2015, the implementation of which is to promote the elimination of
existing differences as far as no one can be deprived of the right of access to
safe water and proper health.
The
important component of solution of these problems is water treatment and
disposal systems – the structural elements of the water industry that are a
part of external water supply and protection systems and their operation
ensures the renewal of barrier functions of environmentally friendly capacities
and the management of negative consequences of unprofitable economic activities
that show up in the deterioration of water supply sources. The sustainable
operation of the abovementioned systems affect water supply schedules in
communities, quality of water, consumed by the urban and rural population that
may significantly affect the public health in the long run.
Traditionally
the water supply and disposal industry is regulated by the government
considering its importance for the national economic development and social
significance for the population. However, not least attractive is its
profitability – one dollar, invested into water supply and health, may yield,
depending on the region, in thirty four times more, but, at the same time, this
industry is problematic enough – the construction of new water supply and
disposal systems is more profitable than maintenance or repair of the old ones.
Ukraine wishes to join the European Union and this means a transition to
substantially higher technical standards of the industry by means of complete
or partial replacement of the existing standards that comes at a price in
resources, including financial resources.
In 2000, the Ukrainian government started to reform the municipal sector
of the economy that resulted in rapid changes in the pricing for centralized
water supply and disposal services. The goal of the reforms was to accept a
rational, economically feasible pricing system that would be able to ensure the
return on investment in the industry, to protect the municipal economy from the
free fall and to make it possible to increase the level and quality of services
provided to customers.
In
August 2001, the State Committee for Construction, Architecture and Housing
Policy, by the agreement with the Ministry of Economy and the State
Antimonopoly Committee, developed the set of regulatory documents, according to
which the principles of economic effectiveness and equity were introduced to
the pricing system. In accordance with the principles, the industry’s
enterprises had the opportunity to cover differences existing in economic,
accounting and tax computations of the costs against the tariffs.
According
to the Ministry of Regional Development, Construction, Housing and Communal
Services of Ukraine, as at 1st December 2015, the actual costs of the following cities
were completely recovered using the approved residential tariffs for water
supply services – Mariupol, Zaporizhia, Cherkasy, Chernihiv, and Kyiv; for
water disposal services – Mariupol, Zhytomir, Zaporizhia, Bila Tserkva,
Severodonetsk, Lviv, Rivne, Cherkasy, and Kyiv; however as at 1st
July 2016 only Zaporizhia and Chernihiv maintained the given status for water
supply services, but Bila Tserkva, Zaporizhia, Lviv, Rivne, Sumy, Cherkasy, and
Chernihiv maintained their status for water disposal services. Except for
Vinnitsa, all regional centers had the same residential and commercial tariff
per 1 cubic meter.
Considering
Ukraine’s aspiration to join the European Union, the calculation of the uniform
residential and commercial tariff for water supply and disposal services was a
completely logical step. However, they have not still determined a separate
expenditure item “Purification of Water” that, in turn, would apply the
polluter-pays-principle in the sector. According to the website of Vik-Varna
Water Supply Company (Varna, Bulgaria), the cost for purification of water of
I-III contamination level for industrial and other consumers is EUR 0.23, 0.33,
and 0.55 per one cubic meter respectively, but the cost of water supply and
disposal is EUR 0.71 and 0.13 per one cubic meter. Voda Donbasu Public Utility
Company has developed the validation of the latest tariff increase up to the
market value, according to which the cost of water supply and disposal services
amounted to EUR 0.2 and 0.34 per one cubic meter. However, the cost of services
in Ukraine is still low compared to the EU countries, and, taking into account
that inflation in our country was 48.7% in the last year, the increase in
tariffs without improvement of service quality may result in negative
consequences, in particular the decrease in payment discipline of consumers
that was observed in the nineties of the last century.
We
should pay special attention to the problem of water losses that is the generic
one for many water supply companies in Ukraine. During 2011, the national
average difference in water supply and sale was more than 40%. Moreover, in
such cities as Zhytomir, Chernivtsi, Uzhhorod, and Sevastopol the level of
losses was more than 70%. The lowest level of losses is in the Russian
Federation – 14.2%. The EU countries have lower values: Germany – 8%, Spain –
11.0%, Japan – 11.7%. The level of losses in Italy and Sweden is 18% and 20%
respectively that is close to our level. However, the specialists, including
the foreign ones, believe that the water loss saving below the 15% level makes
no economic sense as far as the effect is less than the money invested. The
condition of water systems was characterized by significant water leakages from
1km of the mains per hour. According to the European standards, in case of
significant leakages of more than 0.2 cubic meters per one kilometer in hour it
is important to scan the mains and eliminate leakages. In Ukraine, the average
significant leakages are 1.31 cubic meter per one kilometer in hour [1].
According
to the State Statistics Service of Ukraine, as at 1st January 2015
the length of old and emergency mains was still high – 34.6 % (38.2 in 2012)
and while the general trend has a downward nature, the number of emergency and
old mains increases in the most regions. Positive changes have been observed in
Zhitomir, Kyiv, Kirovohrad, Mykolayiv, Sumy, Donetsk, and Luhansk regions. The
number of leakages and unaccounted loses decreased to 0.8 billion cubic meters
compared to 1.2 in 2012.
Consequently,
the industry’s enterprises have to operate under the conditions when the
tariffs do not cover their expenses for many years. In order to solve the
problems, we should find additional funding sources for modernization of water
supply and disposal systems.