Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè/5. Ñîâðåìåííûå ìåòîäû
ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ
Ass. Prof.
O.D. Shvets
State
Higher Educational Institution “National Mining University”
Collaborative learning in the ESP context
The modern highly competitive
labour market with intensive development of science and
technology, widening of business, scientific and cultural relations
internationally demand University graduates to be provided with
the skills that would prepare them for the challenges they will meet. Specialists are required to have the knowledge of a foreign language in order
to be able to communicate effectively in the world of work and be competitive
on the demanding job market.
The English for Specific Purposes
courses that are taught to University students are defined as “… the area of
inquiry and practice in the development of language programs for people who
need a language to meet a predictable range of communicative needs” (Swales,
1992:300). This definition thoroughly reflects the overall aim of English for
Specific Purposes teaching and learning which is to prepare students to
communicate effectively in their academic and professional environments.
In order to help students to get prepared for their future professional
career, collaborative learning is of primary importance in ESP classrooms. ESP
methodology implies that tasks and activities used reflect the students’
specialist world. The ESP courses designed by the teachers of the department of foreign
languages are aimed to develop students’ professionally oriented communicative
skills. The activities such as role-plays, simulations, case studies, project
work and oral presentations have a truly authentic purpose related to students’
target needs. Students’ involvement in pair/group work tends to include
analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the concepts leading to developing their
critical thinking skills. While fulfilling the above mentioned tasks, students
working in pairs or small groups participate in discussions to find solutions
to the problems given, which helps students develop their thinking and
leadership skills as well as individual responsibility for the outcome.
Problem-solving
skills tend to be developed by doing case study, which is considered to be an
ideal method of inducting students into their professional world. It also
improves students’ motivation to learn a language, develops responsibility as
well as all the language skills. Cases reflect typical real life situations
which students will have to encounter with in their professional activity. The
case study method which is commonly used in teaching English for specific
purposes is characterized by active student involvement, high degree of
interaction among students, and the use of authentic materials (manuals,
specifications, instructions, business letters, technical journals, etc.) that
improve the reading comprehension and intensifies the relationship to the
students’ job. Besides, the language skills are developed in an integrated way:
students read the case study thoroughly, working in groups they discuss professionally
oriented problems and recommend solutions (speaking + listening) and do a
writing task which reflects the real world of formal correspondence. If these
skills are separated from one another, a language is taught, however, if they
are integrated with each other, authentic communication is taught (Oxford,
2001). Before reaching their own solution students discuss all the options
practicing the language and developing communicative skills such as
paraphrasing, summarasing, asking for clarification, checking for
understanding, criticizing ideas rather than people. The results of discussions
can be given in the form of a presentation. Students develop management skills
such as working in teams, leading teams, taking turns, delegating and interacting
effectively with each other, managing time which is crucial for future
graduates.
Communication
skills
also include presenting effectively. Presentation skills are developed while preparing for various
students’ scientific conferences. Students learn how to present clearly and effectively a scientific topic.
They are engaged in extensive purposeful reading with processing the
information from various sources. They analyze and summarize the texts, make a
written report and oral presentation, state and justify their opinions.
Students can access the source material in their own time, work through the
material at their own pace, choosing topics to match their own interests. They
can work on their own, in pairs or small groups or as a class to complete a
project sharing resources and ideas. Students’ participation in project work
demonstrates their willingness to learn and accepting responsibility which is
valued by employers.
Thus, project
work promotes collaborative learning. Classrooms are organized so that students
work together in small co-operative teams. Taking into account the low level of
language proficiency of some of the students, it is less threatening to them.
Besides, such an approach enhances students’ learning in the sense of
increasing the amount of their participation. Students work together to produce
a product, but the value of such work lies not just in the final product but in
the process of working on it. The final product (an oral presentation, a poster
presentation, a bulletin board display, a written paper, a report) is shared
with others, giving the project a real purpose.
Project
work is student-centred, though the teacher plays a major role in offering
support and guidance throughout the process. When organized in the way described,
project work places responsibility for
learning on the students themselves. They take control of what and how they
learn.
Such
classroom organisation is considered the most appropriate and effective as
students have much more opportunities to employ their target language and
develop language skills. Working in pairs/groups students do the tasks without
the direct control of a teacher where each student is an individual, they work
in their own manner and learn in their own way thus leading to develop autonomy
skills needed in the future. Collaboration encourages students to rely on each
other and on themselves and not only on the teacher, and extends a proportion
of students’ active involvement in completing a task. Students start thinking
consciously about themselves as learners. They learn to listen and respond to
each other thus providing opportunities for peer and self evaluation.
Team and
group work helps students learn by doing and by teaching other students. In
addition, they learn to work with different types of people developing
interpersonal skills. Being engaged in role-plays, simulations, case studies,
project work and oral presentations students develop self-confidence, think
independently, and work cooperatively.
To sum
up, collaborative learning helps students develop all the skills in an
integrated way doing the following tasks: reading the texts, e.g. cases,
articles; discussing texts; listening and speaking while
discussing; writing summaries/abstracts to the reading material; writing conference
abstracts; making and giving presentations. The advantages of collaborative
learning include the development of a sense
of responsibility in students; activation of all the language and job-related
skills; taking an active role in students’ learning; students may enjoy freedom that comes with
increased responsibility. Teamwork skills contribute to productive working
relationships and outcomes. Students practice these skills working in small
groups to do some tasks which encompass a wide range of skills, such as
decision making, interpersonal communication, leadership, motivation, oral
communication, and time management. Working in teams, students learn to work
effectively with others as a member of a group.
Literature:
1. Ïðîãðàìà ç àíãë³éñüêî¿ ìîâè äëÿ ïðîôåñ³éíîãî
ñï³ëêóâàííÿ. Êîëåêòèâ àâòîð³â: Ã. ª. Áàêàºâà, Î. À. Áîðèñåíêî, ². ². Çóºíîê òà
³í./Ã. ª. Áàêàºâà, Î.À. Áîðèñåíêî, ². ². Çóºíîê òà ³í.– Ê: Ëåíâ³ò, 2005.–120 ñ. – English for Specific
Purposes (ESP) National Curriculum for Universities.
2. Common European
Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge
University Press, 2001.
3.
Dudley-Evans, T. and St. Jones. Developments in English for
Specific Purposes. A Multi-disciplinary
Approach. Cambridge University Press. 1988.
4. Hutchinson, Tom
& Alan Waters. (1987). English for specific purposes: A
learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Maley, A. (1981)
Games and problem solving. London: Longman.
6. Oxford, R. (2001)
Integrated skills in the ESL/EFL classroom. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse
for Languages and Linguistics.
7. Robinson Pauline C.
(1989) ESP Today: A Practitioner’s Guide. Prentice Hall.
8. Swales, John.
(1992). Language for specific purposes. In W. Bright (Ed.), International
encyclopedia of linguistics (Vol. 2, p. 300). New York, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.