Культурология
Savchenko Angelica
SOCIOCULTURAL
SPACE
A
distinctive feature of the present day is the society’s search for some new
philosophical ideas which arise in various cultural trends and forms of
culture.
Recent
studies indicate that social processes in society are more often examined on
the basis of understanding the biological patterns. According to E. Wilson and Ch. Lumsden [15], who
introduced the concept of genetic and cultural coevolution, the culture
directly affects the selection of biological material and is affected by it as
well. In addition, the scientific studies [2, 9] actively discuss the
question of the leading role of the human environment in its evolution and
genetics, the interconnection and interdependence of society, nature and human.
In this
regard, the inseparable relationship of a person, nature and society, the
leading role of culture in their evolution are increasingly discussed in
various scientific fields. The culture is a powerful regulator of all social
changes of society, its value orientations, as it produces a certain system of
values in the sociocultural space, forming the moral basis of society, its
priorities, directly affecting the consciousness of human, its thinking, needs,
ways of interacting with the world, qualitatively changing human and society.
Due to this in the modern sociocultural space there is a growing interest to
human, its nature and uniqueness, and there is a concept that the environment
affects the human and its genetics and shapes its culture.
Research
in a new scientific field – epigenetics – gave us the opportunity to look at a
human from the point of view of the inner world, the mechanisms that form and
regulate its life, behavior, character, thinking, culture [2; 8; 14]. The epigenetic
studies stated that in addition to genetic mechanism of transmission of
hereditary information from one generation to another there is also an
epigenetic mechanism by which changes at the gene level occur [8; 9]. According
to the epigenetic findings, the environment plays a major role in the activity
of certain genes. Biological and genetic processes in the human body are
directly caused by interaction with this environment, and a human is able to
influence its biology.
It is
known that since its birth a human stays in a specific
information and sociocultural space. In this space certain pictures of world
views and human are formed; certain beliefs, ideas, behaviors, priorities are
established, on the basis of which a human forms its world-view, life,
thinking, behavior and culture. Therefore, to some degree the human life is run
by programs founded and formed in early childhood under the influence of those
cultural strata in which it lives and develops. Society, nature and human are
interrelated and interdependent. The condition of one of them reflects the
condition of another. According to the findings of epigenetics, these beliefs,
ideas and views become dominant in the world perception of a human, stating on
its biological condition and, in the future, at the gene level [8; 9; 15].
It
shall be noted that evaluating the beliefs cultivated in a particular society,
a human is able to understand their positive influence or limitations.
Realizing the inadequacy of beliefs, ideas, attitudes developed both in a
particular society and the perception of particular human, it changes
everything that surrounds it, changing its life, biology and genetics; that is,
a human influences the formation of sociocultural space.
Considering
the findings of epigenetics, it can be noted that the person’s inner world is
quite organized, and as a biological structure, a human cannot be studied in
isolation from its thinking, consciousness, lifestyle, environment, behavior,
culture etc. Human, society and culture are organic parts of nature. The
environment contains not only a natural component, which exists independently
of human and its activities, but also social and material conditions of
existence, life, spiritual and moral values, social relations, linkages and
relationships of different cultural backgrounds and information space in which
the human is [13–15].
It is
proven that the more cultured a society is, the more civilized is a human, and
vice versa. Through culture a human accumulates and reproduces the experience
of life, which is manifested in cultural dimensions. Interacting with the
natural world and society, a human experiences its influence and affect it with
its activities. So, culture is a bridge between the human nature and its
environment, the biological and the social, the natural and the acquired in the
process of human life, which leads to its evolution.
In this
regard, in our view, it is possible to assume that the culture, moral and
spiritual values, the ideological dominants that exist in the world view of a
single human and society as a whole, form an information and cultural
environment in which the human is living. This environment, according to the
concept of epigenetics, programs human genes, and in future this impact will
reflect on a biological level [2; 8; 9; 12]. So the state of human genetics and
the genetics of future generations depends on what kind of information will be
received by the human cells. So, the human environment is directly shaped by
its genetics, ideology and culture.
References:
2. Ванюшин Б. Ф. Эпигенетика
сегодня и завтра. Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции / Б. Ф. Ванюшин.
― 2013, Том 17, № 4/2 ― С. 805–832.
8. Липтон Брюс. Умные клетки:
Биология убеждений. Как мышление влияет на гены, клетки и ДНК: перев. с англ /
Брюс Липтон. — М.: ООО Издательство «София», 2013. — 224 с.
9. Липтон Брюс. Спонтанная
эволюция: Позитивное будущее и как туда добраться: перев. с англ / Брюс Липтон,
Стив Бхаэрман — М.: ООО Издательство «София», 2010. — 576 с.
12. Шпорк Петер. Читая между строк
ДНК. Второй код нашей жизни, или Книга, которую нужно прочитать всем. 2-е изд.
/ Петер Шпорк. ― М.: Ломоносовъ,
2013. ― 272 с.
13. Юдин Б. Г. О человеке, его
природе и его будущем / Б. Г. Юдин // Вопросы философии. 2004, №2.
14. Eccles John Evolution
of the Brain: Creation of the Self. ― London: Routledge, 1991
15. Lumsden Ch. J., Wilson E.О. Genes, mind end culture. The
coevolutionary process. ― Harvard
University Press, 1981. ― 428 p.