Philosophy/2. Social philosophy

AN INTEGRAL APPROACH TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY

Popov V. V. , Musica O. A.

Doctor philosophy, Doctor philosophy, Taganrog Institute named

A. P. Chekhov (branch) RSEU (RINKH)

In the examination of problems associated with the study of different approaches to the philosophy of history, there are a number of aspects, which, ultimately, create a wide range of opinions, but does not claim priority placement of accents associated with peculiar understanding of the relationship between philosophy and history in the framework of the post-non-classical science. In the second half of the twentieth century began to develop a new type of post-non-classical rationality, which, emphasizing the historicity of the mind, focuses on the communication processes carried out in a specific socio-cultural space and time, which is determined by historically specific systems of values. The emergence of a new paradigm, its boundaries outlined by various philosophical concepts, schools, currents, install as difficult as in the case of non-classical rationality. The origins of a new type of philosophizing see in the views of M. Heidegger, K. Jaspers, E. Husserl, Including the Pier, U. James L. Wittgenstein and other representatives of non-classical rationalism, which indicates the importance of some methodological principles have not lost their importance in our days.

Socio-philosophical problems directly related to the problem of meaning and sense of history not only because it determines the solution of a philosophical problem, not the connection that we are talking about an adequate level of classical thinking, in relation to which investigated the degree of self-consciousness or awareness in society of a particular stage of its development. You can assume that certain questions concerning the meaning of history, constitute the philosophical basis on which would be imposed by a certain set of interrogative and affirmative statements regarding problems of analytic philosophy and history. A kind of vision of a substantial part of historical perspective may be different depending on in what range is considered herself a human story, for example, as a sequence of mutual complementarity and autonomy of different guises holistic human history that actually manifests itself in the circumstances of climbing theoretical philosophical-historical thinking from the abstract to the concrete. A question about the results of such ascents and their instrumental and pragmatic significance is somewhat aside, because we are talking largely about the effectiveness of certain social technologies, which have their importance in the context of socio-historical practice activity of the subject in relation to reality. Axial problem for the leading philosophical directions becomes the problem of the relation of rational and historical. History no longer thought of as wrong, predefined person or process as a stream of individual psychologizing consciousness, irrational at its core. It is a mode of existence of all phenomena and processes of the world, including the mind, every time a speaker in the specific historical forms, which are the result of human activity. The search for the meaning of history are on the path to determine the ratio of the individual and the universal, subjective and objective, stable and dynamic, traditional and innovative, etc. The center of these intersections is becoming the person for whom history is a fundamental way of its existence. In the result, the story acquires anthropological dimension, for the search of the person of its meaning coincides with the search of the meaning of his life.

Socio-philosophical analysis of the historical process from the position of post-non-classical rationality takes into account a number of factors, for example, the ideal factors associated with knowledge of a particular person or prominent personalities; natural, associated with the geographical environment and human biology and the so-called synthetic, which is largely determined by the mode of production and the available technologies. The method of interpretation of the historical process establishes a person's ability to evolve through space and time on those laws that caused by human history. Schematically this historical process seems to be rising the line leading into the "realm of freedom". Then the story seems not as something incidental, but as a strictly deterministic process, which is closely linked with the civilizational approach to the historical process, allowing to consider the transitions from one phase to another. Turning to the meaning of history, we should say that there is a kind of the need for constituantes factor in history. In this regard, considering the problem of the historical development from the point of view of rationality, it can be noted that the existing history is represented through proper and possible is a correlate of the same things and the same proper. Eventually, the problem of the present time can be considered in terms of the past and possible, i.e. with access to the future, in consequence of which itself exists in principle will have not have true existence. A similar contradiction occurs when designing different models of the historical process, and it really reflects trends that are characteristic of modern post-non-classical science.

The concept of universalization embodies a dynamic and accessible to the researcher parameter problem, allowing empirically to determine the context of her presence. Universalization is a kind of target the cause of historical movement; each historical era embodies a facet of the target causes only a specific angle of approach to a kind of unity and perfection. In addition, the awareness of your own limitations before determining the ontological factors contribute to the opening of consciousness, which, in turn, allows us to perceive the person and reality in the multidimensional spectrum of reality, and thus to develop their own cognitive abilities.

The movement of history is like a kaleidoscope, in which again and again change the configuration of the spheres of human culture. About this in his time, wrote A. Schopenhauer and it is this dynamic cultural life of mankind can be fixed through such fundamental concepts as historical time, the creative process - concepts embodies not an accident or even a fatality historical movement. Any cultural phenomenon is the result of a historical process, its design in a historical space as adequate or inadequate element of this space. Disharmoniously cultural phenomenon means its destructive impact on the historical process of a particular historical epoch, which provokes the onset or continuation of its transformation. However, this inadequacy is a manifestation of the General trend of the universalization of historical existence. Thus, it is possible to distinguish two main semantic vector concepts historical universalization: universal, which determines the movement of historical and cultural life and is a kind of historical setting; the specific historical, which determines the degree of conformity of a cultural phenomenon to a specific historical context.

Literature:

1. Musica O.A., Popov V.V. Time and social synergetics.- Rostov-n/D., 2007.- 177 p.

2. Popov V.V., Scheglov B.S. Postnonclassical picture of the world as a factor in the knowledge society // Proceedings of the 4th International Academic Conference «Applied and Fundamental Studies», St. LOUIS, USA, 2014-p.103-108.

3. Popov V.V. Rationality and freedom: inconsistency of discourse in modern science // European Applied Sciences: modern approaches in scientific researches- Stuttgart, 2013- p. 126-129.

4. Popov V.V. Methodological features of social contradictions // Humanities and Social Sciences in Europe: Achievements and Perspectives- Vienna, 2014 – p. 215 – 219.

5. Popov V.V. Social rationality and global evolutionism // European Applied Sciences- № 7, 2013- Stuttgard- p. 71 – 73.

6. Popov V.V. Development of the modern theory of rationality // The journal «International journal of applied and fundamental research»- Munchen, 2013- p. 92 – 94.

7. Popov V. V. The problem of intersybjectivity//Analecta Husserliana -Hague. 1997.- P. 133-141.