Philosophy/2. Social philosophy

 

Popov V. V. , Musica O. A.

Doctor philosophy, Doctor philosophy,

Taganrog Institute named

A. P. Chekhov (branch) RSEU (RINKH), Russia

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF SELF-ORGANIZING

SYSTEMS IN POSTNONCLASSICAL DISCOURSE

 

Modern development of post-non-classical picture of the world and the development of post-non-classical science has identified the development of nonlinear, self-organizing, self-developing systems. Moreover, of all kinds, including social systems. In this regard, of course there were problems, which are conceptual in nature, because in the light of post-non-classical science there is a need to revise some of the concepts and categories that have received a slightly different meaning in the modern post-non-classical science than they had before. In principle, such change affect not only any specific studies, but the whole cycle of natural science and Humanities disciplines, therefore, appeal to social philosophy, philosophical knowledge in this regard seems to be quite natural.

There is a need to produce a kind of reorientation of a number of philosophical concepts and categories in accordance with the goals and objectives in this study. In the first place is a dynamic system of concepts and categories, which implies certain rethinking of a number of concepts and their semantic and conceptual clarification and identification of their role and place in modern post-non-classical discourse.

A priority in this study we have categories of randomness and probability, the more that they have undergone the most significant rethinking in post-non-classical discourse. The initial value that was assigned to these categories, for example, in classical science or non-classical, has significantly changed due to the fact that fundamentally there has been a change in understanding of the modern world picture, when in the center of this picture became man as a social subject with their desires, aspirations, beliefs, estimates, etc. It is quite clear that it is active, transformative role involves transferring a particular emphasis on the conceptual-semantic aspects, the tools which the social subject can be explored and applied to the study of socio-historical development of society, to determine the characteristics of those processes that occur in it, to distinguish between certain segments of such processes.

On the other hand, the category of probability and randomness acquired methodological role, because it is quite natural that under the various problems of modern science, and not only philosophical problems, the category of chance and probability play a significant role. By the way, in the framework of the post-non-classical science, most scientists were not left in no doubt about the fact that randomness and probability are philosophical categories, and not by any special terms or concepts in natural science or other knowledge.

Traditionally, the likelihood was used for a specific assessment of the degree of occurrence of any historical or social events, and in advance stipulated the conditions under which these events can occur. The idea seems thus that the matching probability with predefined conditions regarding, for example, the offensive capabilities of a historical or social events, ultimately, will allow you to compare various alternatives or prospects from the point of view of realization of those opportunities to which the procedure of the probability is used.

Modern post-non-classical science is science, primarily associated with the nonlinear representation of various kinds of systems, so you should say that it is hardly possible to suppose the existence of any absolute stability, because the world is not stable, the world is organizing itself and, accordingly, the category probabilities needed to have some practical nature to justify the implementation of one or the other possibility.

It should be said that, based on the probability theory, the relationship that is grounded between probability and possibility, it is fair to mention the fact that changes in social or other nature, which is undergoing a reality, always associated with an increased probability of exercise of varying abilities and in parallel with this naturally decreases the probability of some other possibilities, which can be as competing opportunities, and the opposite, or maybe neither. Therefore, in the literature there is a consensus that the probability with quantitative positions characterizes the ability, that is, from a certain side, associated with its implementation, and that implementation will take place under specific conditions, moreover, the probability quantitatively shows how quickly this ability will be and there will come some new local reality.

It really is an important issue, because the likelihood of some features, for example social or historical events in local conditions and in a particular situation, take into account that with the change of these conditions and the situation may change and the likelihood of one or the other possibility, which in General will present to the researcher completely new problems and tasks. Therefore, justly and lawfully be noted that the probability seems to be some characteristic of the relationship of social and historical events with certain circumstances, because only these relatively unchanged circumstances it will be possible to speak about a certain probability of selected social or historical events.

However, when the researcher accurately imagine the dialectic of subjective and objective conditions, it may, in this case to say that certain features are implemented to a greater or lesser extent. And for some local situations such comparisons can be very effective. Therefore, the probability of showing some interval of the implementation of one or the other possibility should be considered a necessary party to the possibilities, and from the point of view of its quantitative certainty.

The development of probability in the framework of non-classical science was largely due to the implementation of statistical methods in various fields of scientific knowledge and respectively applied nature likely to display some specific links, different sets of objects having uniform character. This proves the correctness of our conclusions regarding the likelihood characterizes, for example, the category of possible quantitative perspective. Because, explores various industries, you may receive new material that will be used by the researcher to consider the dialectic of the real and possible in some specific statistical situations.

 

Literature:

1. Popov V.V., Scheglov B.S. Postnonclassical picture of the world as a factor in the knowledge society // Proceedings of the 4th International Academic Conference «Applied and Fundamental Studies»- St. LOUIS USA, 2014-Ð.103-108.

2. Popov V.V. Rationality and freedom: inconsistency of discourse in modern science // European Applied Sciences: modern approaches in scientific researches- Stuttgart, 2013- Ð. 126-129.

3.  Popov V.V. Methodological features of social contradictions // Humanities and Social Sciences in Europe: Achievements and Perspectives- Vienna, 2014 – Ð. 215 – 219.

4. Popov V.V. Social rationality and global evolutionism // European Applied Sciences- ¹ 7, 2013, Stuttgard- Ð. 71 – 73.

5. Popov V.V. Development of the modern theory of rationality // The journal «International journal of applied and fundamental research»- Munchen, 2013- Ð. 92 – 94.

6. Popov V. V. The problem of intersybjectivity//Analecta Husserliana -Hague. 1997.- P. 133-141.