Филологические науки /Риторика и стилистика

Айнабекова Л.И.

Региональный социально – инновационный университет, Казахстан

COGNITIVE ASPECT OF ADVERTISEMENT TEXT

 

The tendency to distinguish discourse and text according to dynamic and static criteria is revealed in the works of group of scientists such as P.Werth, D.Gevins, L.Idalgo Dauning, E.Lakhey, E.Semino, P.Stokwell and others. According to the scholars theory, discourse is a complex socio-psycholinguistic phenomenon which includes the language process in a certain social context and its result -   text.

More and more scientists are starting to support the idea that all knowledge is in the form of mental representations. V.Z. Demyankov and E.S. Kubryakova believe that the representation is an important part of our consciousness: "... we always, when it seems to us necessary, can imagine the domestic "screen" of any object, any situation among the real objects or persons surrounding us, as well as the imaginary events " (Kubryakova, Demyankov 2007: 14-15).

Any situation is thought of as a cognitive basis of discourse. The interest in the situation is explained with the fact that linguistic event takes place within this situation. The understanding of the situation by P. Werth is quite close to the interpretation of the model situation by T. Van Dijk (van Dijk 1989: 46). According to van Dijk, the model of the situation is formed by a concrete individual, his or her personal knowledge, experience, attitudes, feelings, emotions, opinions, and is used by the addressee while understanding the text. It is unique, dynamic, mobile and strategic complex, since it activates all the levels and structures. The situation represents a complex set of circumstances, characterized by a place, a time, a set of entities that are in certain relation with each other.

Combining the explicitly expressed textual information and background knowledge (presupposition), the reader naturally creates a certain mental "picture". Presupposition is understood as a component of text which represents the background knowledge. It is impossible to perceive the text adequately without this background (presuppositional) knowledge. Presupposition may appear while reading another text or it may stay in the mind of human without being verbalized.

Mental picture and its modeling, particularly in advertising, is the subject to utilitarian and mundane goals: how to efficiently encourage the addressee for action that is profitable for producer. Mental representation constructed in the human mind while processing the information is called  a textual world.

The following elements are essential for the description of the “world”:

• textual base - language material fixed on a particular physical medium;

• cognitive base - knowledge and understanding of communicants.

The textual base is formed by set of linguistic forms that serve for "packaging" conveyed meaning. It can be regarded as an act of fixing the language (surface) forms of a certain conceptual structure (Kubryakova 1992: 284). The main function of textual base is to help the addressee to construct a kind of mental model that can be stored in memory for a long time. Simple story with a happy ending, as proposed in the above mentioned advertisement of gel, is designed not only to inform consumers about the product, but also to focus on the product image and relate to it as to the integral part of human life.

Thus, reading the advertising message, the person activates only the referentially demanded knowledge. In advertising of dental services it may be knowledge about the features of the treatment of the oral cavity, the procedure of admission of patients, tooth extraction, prosthetics, and so on. The knowledge about  hockey or how to tune a guitar appear to be unnecessary and inappropriate.

Noting some categorical statements it is expedient to say that the cognitive base includes knowledge and understandings, which are possessed by the majority of the linguistic culture. In addition, it also includes the resource of individual image held by each linguistic identity.

Cognitive base is formed by the knowledge and understanding of not only the extra-linguistic reality, but also by the knowledge of the language and culture. Using the knowledge in the understanding of discourse is the ability to relate the text with some existing cognitive structure on the base of which the textual world is created. Cognitive structures which reflect "rolled" form of encoding information are called frames, circuit, script, scripts, plans, cognitive model and etc.

We fully share the view that a person perceives what is happening in the light of previously acquired knowledge structures and make a choice in favor of the term frame indicating the structure of mental representations of conceptual content. Some linguists state that "life context of discourse is modeled in the form of" frames "(typical situations) or "scenarios "(focuses on the development of the situation.

In the space of one textual world several mental representations can simultaneously occur. Alternatives within the textual world are called subworlds. The prefix sub-, used by P. Werth (subworld), remarkably discredits the selected term and gives the wrong idea about its semantics.

Communicants have the capacity to create multiple derivatives worlds simultaneously without certain cognitive effort. Besides, they easily "switch" from one to another.

The identified levels reflect the nature of the interpenetration of the constitutive elements of discourse. A decisive role is played by the correlation of elements of textual and cognitive base, the activation of which leads to the creation of mental models. These mental models serve as a basis for the acknowledgment of discursive situation.

Literature:

1.                 Кубрякова Е.С. Проблемы представления знаний в современной науке и роль лингвистики в решении этих проблем // Язык и структуры представления знаний. – М., 1992. – С.4-38.

2.                 Демьянков В.З. Когнитивизм, когниция, язык и лингвистическая теория // Язык и структуры представления знаний. – М., 1992. – С.39-77.

3.                 Дейк Т.А., ван. Язык. Познание. Коммуникация. - М., 1989. - С. 41.