Ýêîíîìè÷åñêèå íàóêè/12.Ýêîíîìèêà ñåëüñêîãî õîçÿéñòâà
PhD Kateryna Prokopenko
State organization “Institute of the economy and forecasting of the
National academy of sciences of Ukraine”
Structural changes in agriculture [1]
Assessment of structural changes
in agriculture based on analysis of its major resource potential components in
dynamics has been made. Methodical approaches to estimation resource potential
take into account main types of farms (agricultural enterprises and
households). Developing methodology of assessment of labor force and basic
assets in main categories of producers as well as efficiency of land use has
been introduced.
During the years of
independence considerable structural changes have taken place in agriculture of
Ukraine, namely, part of households in gross agricultural production was
considerably multiplied. At the beginning of 90th about 30% of production was
created by households, in 2005 its part increased to 60% and now their part is
about 45%. During this period basic assets were perceptibly extended at
households (the area of agricultural lands was multiplied by 5,9 times, there
were tractors and harvesters in their property), although mainly such growth of
part of households is explained by the lay-off in agricultural enterprises.
Now large enterprises adapted
to new conditions of management and already more than 15 years continue to
yield positions in production of agricultural goods [2].
To determine the role of
households in agricultural production we needed to conduct the analysis of
efficiency of their production activity in comparison with agricultural
enterprises.
Many scientists devoted their
papers to this problem. In particular, recently a number of works on the
analysis of efficiency of production in households was published [3]. The noted
researches highlight the state of agricultural sector in the period after
reforms and the roles of both agricultural enterprises and households in
agricultural production.
During the years of
independence considerable redistribution of resources between two main
production sectors took place. The resources of agricultural producers include
the agricultural land, basic assets and labor resources. In our opinion, the
recent structural changes in agriculture need be to traced exactly in this cut.
Agriculture of Ukraine from
the 90s of the last century suffered considerable changes in relation to a
structure, quality and amount of foregoing factors. Especially it concerns
their distributing between basic producers. This period is characterized by
carrying out land reform, and part of agricultural lands owned by population
was considerably multiplied as a result. Calculations show that the use of
agricultural lands by the economies of population is more effective than those
of agricultural enterprises. Although the reason of such correlation of indexes
is first of all the pattern of production and price factor. Households grow
mainly labor intensive products which have a high price (garden stuff and
berries, vegetables and so on).
During the period from 1990 to
2003 gross crop production per 100 ha agricultural lands, as a basic index of
efficiency of their use, in agricultural enterprises increased by 1,7 times,
and in households grew short by 2,3 times, here the rate of abbreviation of
area of agricultural lands in agricultural enterprises made 1,9 times, and in
the households the area grew by 5,9 times (see Table 1). Although it shows that
reduction of efficiency of the use of agricultural lands by households is
greater than in agricultural enterprises, in our opinion, only due to the
transmission of the land resources to the economies of population we managed to
decrease reduction of gross production.
If we assume that the
structure of distributing of agricultural lands did not change from 1990, under
conditions of 2014, agricultural enterprises would get gross products of
plant-grower to the amount of UAH 198772,8 mln and households – UAH 12138,6
mln, which makes UAH 210911,4 mln total. In fact, in 2014 gross
plant-grower production amounted to UAH 177707,9 mln. Consequently, the
difference between the actual volume of gross plant-grower production and
expected with leveling of influence of
sector structure of agricultural lands is UAH 33203,5 mln which can be
considered the influence of the factor of change of structure of land use.
Table 1
Efficiency
of the use of agricultural lands by enterprises and households
|
Indicators |
1990 |
2000 |
2014 |
|||
|
enterprises |
households |
enterprises |
households |
enterprises |
households |
|
|
Area of agricultural lands (on
January, 1): - thousand of ha |
38705,4 |
2669,0 |
29878,0 |
8543,4 |
20548,9 |
15868,7 |
|
- % |
93,5 |
6,5 |
77,8 |
22,2 |
56,4 |
43,6 |
|
Gross crop production (in 2010 prices),
UAH mln of UAH |
117938,0 |
27564,0 |
45791,0 |
47047,9 |
105529,5 |
72178,4 |
|
Gross crop production per
100 ha agricultural lands, thousand of UAH |
304,7 |
1032,7 |
153,3 |
550,7 |
513,6 |
454,8 |
Source: own calculations based on the data provided by
the State Statistics Service of Ukraine.
As to such components of
production potential as labor, it
underwent both quantitative and structural changes during this period,
and efficiency of its use in households decreased.
Table 2
Efficiency of
the use of labor resources by main production sectors
|
Indicators |
1990 |
2014 |
2014 to 1990 |
|||
|
enterprises |
households |
enterprises |
households |
enterprises |
households |
|
|
Gross agricultural production (in
compared prices), mln of UAH |
199161,3 |
83612,9 |
139058,4 |
112380,2 |
0,698 |
1,344 |
|
Employment, thousand of persons |
4344,4 |
680,8 |
607,5 |
2483,9 |
0,1398 |
3,6485 |
|
Labor productivity per 1 working
person, thousand of UAH |
45,8 |
122,8 |
228,9 |
45,2 |
4,9978 |
0,3681 |
Source: own calculations based on the data provided by
the State Statistics Service of Ukraine.
During the analysis of the use
of labor resources it is necessary to have in mind, that for explored period
the method of determination of employment in agricultural enterprises
practically did not change and decrease of employment in this sector by 7 times
can be considered reliable. At the same time the method of determination of
employment in households changed a few times and growth of this index by 3,6
times is doubtful.
For this period in
agricultural enterprises the productivity increased by 5 times that is
explained by increase of gross production, reduction of labor resources and growth efficiency of
production process. Higher rates of decrease of productivity in households
(more than by 3 times) are explained yet, in our opinion by the inadequate
dynamics of employment in this sector, as significant changes were not observed during this period.
Calculations demonstrate that
keeping of old structure and amount of employment, in 2014 we would get gross
agricultural products by 773767 mln of UAH less, than actually. Thus in
agricultural enterprises gross production would increase 5 times while in
households – 2,7 times less. Assuming that the dynamics of employment in
households and enterprises is faithful, it is possible to do a conclusion that
even under condition of rapid decrease of productivity in households, growth of
employment exactly in sector of enterprises would make it possible to get the
greater volumes of production.
Although till 2005 all
calculations demonstrate higher efficiency of the use of resources in
households, now agricultural enterprises are more efficient producers.
Redistribution of resources in behalf of sector of households gave possibility
to hold back from the critical falling of production during the 90s of the last
century. But advantages of efficiency of production in households are
conditioned structure of gross products. The most labor intensive and expensive
products are produced here (vegetables, potato, fruits and others like that).
For this reason, definitely, gross agricultural production in households is
multiplied due to a structural factor.
As for the sector of
agricultural enterprises, its ineffectiveness is conditioned by active
involvement of support, both material and intellectual, advisory, technology
does not matter the risk to invest in this sector during the economic crisis.
Factor analysis of the
availability and use of resources, namely land and labor of the agricultural
sector was conducted. Only through the redistribution of land resources for the
benefit of families it was managed to reduce the rate of decline in gross
agricultural production during the first 15 years of independence. Even on
condition of more rapid decline of labor productivity in the households, growth
of amount of employment exactly in this sector gave possibility to obtain
significant production and mitigate the sharp decline in employment in
enterprises.
Coming from tendencies taking
place in the modern economy of Ukraine, it is possible to assert that during a
certain period the output of agricultural production by households will remain
considerable, and this producer will remain important for the agrarian market
of Ukraine. However only agricultural enterprises can accumulate basic and
circulating facilities necessary for the intensive production with a prospect
of providing competitive agricultural production.
References:
1. Èññëåäîâàíèå âûïîëíåíî ïðè ïîääåðæêå
ÍÀÍ Óêðàèíû â ðàìêàõ âåäîìñòâåííîé òåìû "Ðåñóðñíûå âîçìîæíîñòè ðàçâèòèÿ
àãðàðíîãî ñåêòîðà ýêîíîìèêè Óêðàèíû" (íîìåð ãîñóäàðñòâåííîé ðåãèñòðàöèè
0114U001638.)
2. LERMAN, Z., CSAKI, C. (1999): Ukraine:
Review of Farm Restructuring Experiences, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
3. SHPYTCHAK, O.M. (2001): Osobysti
pidsobni gospodarstva Ukrainy – analiz vytrat ta efektyvnosti vyrobnytstva
vydiv sil’s’kogospodars’koi produktsii, IAE, Kyiv.
4. PASKHAVER, B. (2002): Dynamika fondovoi
najavnosti, Ekonomika Ukrainy, 7, pp. 23-31.
5. STATE STATISTIC COMMITTEE OF UKRAINE:
Agriculture of Ukraine, Statistical Yearbook, Kyiv, several editions.