Åêîíîì³÷í³ íàóêè/7. Îáë³ê òà àóäèò
PhD, Associate Professor Bulkot A.V., Master of
Science Shevtsova A.L.
State Higher Educational Establishment «Kyiv National
Economic University named after Vadym Hetman», Ukraine
METHODICAL
BASIS FOR AUDIT OF GOODWILL
Nowadays a wide range of clients, qualified staff and
the reputation of the company only increase its value.
Goodwill is the value formed as a result of the
integrated management of the attractive force, quality, relations with
partners, reputation management, financial results, social responsibility,
which are all sources of increase in the value of the company [1].
According to British researchers, the excess value of
intangible assets, such as know-how, patents, goodwill, copyrights, brand, that
are not reflected in the balance sheet, is for «Coca-Cola», for IBM - 83%,for
British Petroleum - 71% of the market price of these companies. Therefore, we
can determine that goodwill represents a significant share of the market value
of modern companies, especially when intangible assets are the main part of the
companies’ assets.
The purpose of an independent auditor is to obtain
sufficient and appropriate auditing evidences, so that to form auditor’s
opinion. However, obtaining auditing evidence for assets such as goodwill is
quite problematic for an auditor, as this type of checking is quite
complicated.
While checking the procedures of acquisition, merging
or consolidation of the companies, it is necessary to determine the general
nature of their activities:
a) sphere of activity of the acquired company;
b) profitability of the company;
c) projected results of its activity;
d) usefulness of the object;
e) possibility of the excess of acquisition over the
fair value of the object.
The main differences in the reflection of business
association according to international and national accounting standards are
that IFRS 3 [2] provides recognition of business association only as
acquisition (NAS19 [4] determines two methods of accounting: acquisition and
merger) and regular checking of goodwill for impairment (NAS 19 [4] provides
positive goodwill depreciation) [5].
Following the procedures
stated above, it is necessary to consider the legality and
possible effectiveness of business operations for each agreement separately,
that is for acquisition and consolidation of companies.
The objectives of the verification procedure of
acquisition and results of the company are:
a) process of purchasing the object by the buyer;
b) procedure for liquidation of the objects purchased
by the buyer;
c) procedure for reflection of goodwill or negative
goodwill in auditing;
d) whether purchased shares (share capital) are
reflected in financial investments;
f) whether acquired facilities are reflected in the
amount of paid cash or cash equivalents;
f) whether purchased identifiable assets and
liabilities are valued at their fair value;
g) whether original (book) value of goodwill is
reduced monthly in equal parts during the time of its use[3].
Particular attention should be paid to useful life of
goodwill. This rate is influenced by:
a) estimated period of the enterprise activity;
b) regulations or contracts that influence useful
life;
c) changes in demand for products (services) of the company,
etc. [4].
It is also necessary to determine the objectives of
auditing merger of the companies. In the process of auditing merger of the
companies you should check:
a) whether costs connected with merger of enterprises
(registration, information, consulting, etc.) have been allocated for expenses
in the period in which they were made;
b) whether financial statements figures of merged
companies were reflected in the financial statements in the period of merger
and the previous period;
c) whether the assets are stated
at their carrying value to reflect changes in accounting policy of merged
company;
d) whether internal liabilities and results of
operations are included in financial statements of merged venture [3].
Therefore, to obtain full and relevant information
about the goodwill in the company it is necessary to conduct qualitative
independent auditing. The result of the audit should be reflected in the
appropriate auditing report, which will be useful for managers of the entity
during the process of taking decisions.
References:
1. Koshevets V. V. Formuvannia
poniatiyno-kategorialnogo aparatu systemy upravlinnia goodvilom pidpryemstva /
V. V. Koshevets // Visnik Sumskogo derzhavnogo universytetu. Ser. : Ekonomika.
- 2012. – ¹. 4. - P. 102-106.
2. IFRS 3 “Business Combinations”,International
Financial Reporting Standards.Part I, 1278 p.
3. Ogiychuk M. F. Audit: organizatsiia i metodyka:
navchal’nyy posibnyk dlia vuziv / M. F. Ogiychuk, I. T. Novikov, I. I.
Ragulina. - K.: Alerta, 2010. - 584 p.
4. P(S)BO 19 “Ob’ednannia pidpryemst”, zatverdzhene
nakazom Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy vid 07.07.99 r. ¹ 163
5. Tomashevska I.L. Ob’ekty buhgalterskogo obliku pry
prydbanni pidpryemstv / I.L. Tomashevska // Problemy teorii ta metodologii
buhgalterskogo obliku, kontroliu i analizu. Mizhnarodnyy zbirnyk naukovyh
prats. / Ser.: Buhgalterskiy oblik, kontrol i analiz. – 2007. – ¹.3(9). - P.
172-178.