Кандидат филологических
наук
Ломова Елена Александровна
Место работы, должность: доцент кафедры русской и мировой
литературы Казахского государственного национального педагогического
университета имени Абая (КазНПУ им. Абая), Казахстан, г. Алматы
Домашний адрес: Казахстан, 050021, г. Алматы, ул.
Калдаякова, д. 103, кв. 23
Телефон 3-29-23-74, 8-701-722-89-53
Эл. адрес: elena_lomova_@mail.ru
Аннотация
Проникновение
идей Ф.В. Ницше в Америку и рецепция их американским интеллектуальным
сообществом имеет определенную специфику, которая определяется тем, что
первоначально восприятие текстов Ф.В. Ницше осуществлялось «в общем контексте
интереса и желания приобщиться к новейшим художественным и философским
открытиям Европы.
В этом
контексте и сам Ф.В. Ницше, с его глубоким интересом к философии американского
трансцендентализма, и прежде всего, романтическому наследию Р.У. Эмерсона,
вполне вписывается в те культурологические и философские теории, которые
зародились на собственно американской почве.
Другим
выразительным примером влиятельности идей Ф.В. Ницше в американской
литературной среде может служить творчество таких знаменитых писателей Америки,
как Джек Лондон и Теодор Драйзер.
Annotation
The penetration of the ideas of F.V. Nietzsche's
reception in America and their American intellectual community had a certain
specificity and defined by the fact that the perception of the original texts
of F.V. Nietzsche was carried out in the general context of the interest and
desire to join the latest artistic and philosophical discoveries in Europe.
From another side F.V. Nietzsche kept himself a deep
interest in different cultural and philosophical theory, particular American
transcendentalism, and above all romantic heritage R.U. Emerson.
Another dramatic example of influence ideas F.V.
Nietzsche in American literary community can serve as a work of such famous
American writers like Jack London and Theodore Dreiser.
Ключевые слова: идея, восприятие, мораль, скрытое цитирование,
литературное сознание, идеология, индивидуализм, сильная личность, прагматизм,
эгоизм, генеалогия, эволюция характера.
Keywords: idea, perception, morality precepts, covered quotation, literature
consciousness, ideology, individualisms, homo supersepiens, pragmatism, egoism,
the germ of an idea, evolution, evaluation of character.
Influence
of F.V. Nietzsche’s philosophy on American literature from point of view
Russian and Anglo-American Studies
The breadth and diversity of exposure to F.V.
Nietzsche on the culture of the West at the turn of XIX-XX centuries, approved
the real perception of his ideas community of writers and their reflection in
literary and artistic practice in Western Europe, Russia and the United States.
[13], [15]
In this case the reception ideas F.V. Nietzsche in
American literature directly superimposed on quite complex and specific process
of its development in the period from 1890 till 1910.
The penetration of the ideas of F.V. Nietzsche's
reception in America and their American intellectual community had a certain
specificity [6] and defined by the fact that the perception of the original
texts of F.V. Nietzsche was carried out in the general context of the interest
and desire to join the latest artistic and philosophical discoveries in Europe,
which were presented theories of Spencer and Darwin, the philosophy studies of
Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer. [16]
From another side F.V. Nietzsche kept himself a deep
interest in different cultural and philosophical theory, particular American
transcendentalism, and above all romantic heritage R.U. Emerson. [19]
Another dramatic example of influence ideas F.V.
Nietzsche in American literary community can serve as a work of such famous
American writers like Jack London and Theodore Dreiser.
Evidence of persistent interest in Nietzsche in
England and in US was the fundamental project «The complete works», carried out
in 1909-1913, edited by G. Levi and included almost all the F.V. Nietzsche.
In the interwar and after I World War historical
period the situation around F.V. Nietzsche was already changing, and interest
in his figure sharply weakened in the new social and political reality although
a number of American critics, among them the Kassersa continued to develop and
interpret the theory of F.V. Nietzsche's "superman".
Interest in the philosophical heritage F.V. Nietzsche
once again revived in the English literary criticism from 1960, and issue of
the influence of the philosopher in the American literary and artistic
consciousness became the material of theses many Western scholars (Kauffman Le
Roy C, Clarl M., Clouwes EW, Sheng Ch.). [14], [8], [9], [20]
Reception ideas F.V. Nietzsche in the US had a
significant history and in varying degrees affected the vast majority of
creative and poets, among them F. Norris, I. London, T. Dreiser, Upton
Sinclair, T. Eliot and many others.
A special role in the literary and aesthetic
understanding of philosophy F.V. Nietzsche belongs to I. Hyuneker and G. Lo
Mencken. [4]
I. Hyuneker perceived and interpreted the idea of
F.V. Nietzsche, first of all, as one aspect of Western culture,
reflected in his collection of essays.
"The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche"
(1908) and "Nietzsche exposures" (1910) of G.L. Mencken actively
promoted the view F.V. Nietzsche’s philosophy and ethics were
dedicated to called issue. [12]
Besides in this time there were a lot of monographs
(Thatcher; Bridgwater) and special research (Nietzsche in) revealed the various
aspects of his philosophical legacy.
American scientists (Sherman Stuart P.) examined
problem of correlation of literary texts with texts F.V. Nietzsche and his
distinct cases, or hidden in the works of citing individual writers, or trying
to speculate on the nature of the manifestation of ideas and the philosophy of
F.V. Nietzsche in particular cultural formation (Ackerman, Sheng, Zapf). [2],
[21], [23]
From the outset, in the intellectual life of the USA
developed there were two types of attitude to F.V. Nietzsche. One of them was
very negative, and formed mainly on the influence of the book by Max Nordau,
containing aggressive criticism of philosophical system F.V. Nietzsche.
Another kind of relationship could be called
comparatively positive, because its partisans tried to understand the essence
of Nietzsche’s ideas. But the influence of philosophy of Nietzsche gradually
increased and its supporters implemented it in the process of reflection and
literary interpretation.
The Russian literary influence problem F.V. Nietzsche
on the American literary consciousness was highly developed only from a
negative point of view. [1]
Such scholars as the Samohvalov, Zassoursky avoided
detailed discussion of this issue [11], while others (I. Bodanova, Bykov) [3],
even doubted the seriousness of the dating of major American writers (such as
Jack London) with the works of F.V. Nietzsche.
Other researchers are still admitted a certain
influence F.V. Nietzsche to the representatives of creative elite of the United
States [17], but attributed it to the specifics of the political views of Jack
London or approved (like A. Sadagursky), that
J. London took in F.V. Nietzsche and Zhogin only joyful life lifting his
"hero", his affirmation vigor in life. [25], [24]
In addition a lot of scientists didn’t admit the great
difference between the strong character of Jack London and ideal F.V.
Nietzsche, claiming the idea that the writer had spoken of the dangers of
extreme individualism, had broken with the tradition of universal humanity. On
the contrary, J. London solved the problem of the strong relationship between
the individual and society. [1]
I. Lunina, discussing about the influence of the
philosophy of F.V. Nietzsche on the work of Jack London, confirmed that the
writer all his life was in search, while denying the possibility of the
individual to decide the destinies of all humanity and opposed the anarchy
ideology and methods of individual terrorism. [17]
V. Bykov emphasized the difference between J. London
and F. Nietzsche. He believed, that the F.V. Nietzsche character was immoral,
because from his point of view, if someone was getting to fall, he must be
push. [5]
Oppositely the basis properties of J. London positive
image were spiritual nobility and comradely mutual assistance. [4]
R. Samarin asserted the influence of pragmatism theory
on the creativity of J. London, which paved the way for the cult of the
"strong" character in American literature. [7]
Another Russian researcher T.L. Morozov affirmed that
the capital system itself, based on ruthless competition had created in the
human mind the idea of "survival of the fittest". [10]
In the process of logical development this idea came
to the principle of "superman", who was allowed to do everything by
right of his power and priority.
E.A. Morozkina exploring the creativity of T. Dreiser
stressed a significant impact on same aspects his works philosophy of F.V.
Nietzsche. The writer rethought his views in accordance his chosen realistic
method in the literature and the historical period which he belonged to. [18]
S. Vyshlenkova submitted that the familiarity with the
ideas of FW Nietzsche from the very beginning of his career might be indicative
of Jack London's novel "Daughter of the Snows" (1902), where the
process of the London understanding of Nietzsche's ideology and Nietzsche’s
hero had just begun. [22]
Obviously familiarity between ideas of the both
writers only scratched the surface, but served as a basis for the re-treatment
of J. London creativity
F.V. Nietzsche in 1904.
Further work was characterized by the writer's
profound understanding of the nature of personality ("People of the
Abyss", "Sea Wolf"). It was noteworthy that in the novel
"The Sea Wolf" J. London didn’t show only the basic conflict
"Genealogy of Morals", which consisted altruism as opposed to egoism,
and actually offered an alternative to image Larsen in the form of higher
morally strong man.
London reception F.V. Nietzsche was undergone some
"evolution in a creative and artistic development of the writer".
F.V. Nietzsche became and remained a constant
companion and an opponent of J. London and that way an adequate assessment of
the creative legacy of J.
London would be move biased without study F.V. Nietzsche’s philosophy.
J. London cast later doubt on the consistency of human
individualism and his premonition doom.
Despite the hot passion of the human idea of
individualism as a young man, a mature J. London bitterly had to
admit that as soon as his characters were detached from the social environment,
as Martin Eden and harsh reality defeated in their failure becomes inevitable.
As for Theodore Dreiser, the influence of the ideas of
F.V. Nietzsche was not for him exceptional. [20]
Theodore Dreiser created in his work various artistic
personality models and integrated such personal characteristics as the
selfishness and self-centeredness, generated by the "philosophy of
success" and the desire to be a strong personality, able to achieve a
success in life and associated dividends. [21]
The writer vividly embodied in his works the imagery
with analyzing of the social and psychological characteristics of the
individual, especially its conscious and subconscious, which found expression
in his novel "Sister Carrie", "Jennie Gerhardt",
"Trilogy of desire", "Genius" and "An American
Tragedy".
Personality in the works of Theodore Dreiser forced to
fight for the opportunity to realize their desire, but suffered a repulse or
tragically killed or lost spirituality.
Theodore Dreiser dissected the personality of genius
and financier and gave an accurate picture of their immorality and creative
nature as a subject to the influence of desires and passions.
Thus, the perception of F.V. Nietzsche’s ideas looks
place in the creativity of T. Dreiser and was expressed in the dynamics and
evolution of characters Hurstwood, Cowperwood Eugene Wheatley, and other
characters of the great American writer.
Literature
1. American literature of the XX century. - M., 1978.
- 312 p.
2. Ackerman R. Current American thought on, 1988. N.Y.
- 129 p.
3. Badanova I.M. Jack London and his hero. - M., 1963.
- 127 p.
4. Baltimore G.L. Menken // Dialog USA. - Washington,
1990. N.8. – p. 48-56
5. Bykov V.M. Creativity of Jack London // Problems of
Literature, 1980, N.Y. N8. – p. 286-293
6. Cadello J.P. Nietzsche in America: The spectrum of
perspectives, 1895-1925. Diss., U. of Purdue, 1990. - 246 p.
7. Casseres B.D. The Superman in America. Seattle,
N.-Y. 1929. - 167 p.
8. Clark M. Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. N.-Y.,
1990. - 176 p.
9. Clouwes E.W. The revolution of moral consciousness:
Nietzsche in Russian literature, 1890-1914. Dekalb: Northern Illinois univ,
press, 1998. - 200 p.
10. Gordeeva E.Y. Theodore Dreiser, and the
"American dream" // ideological and artistic diversity of foreign
literature and new of modern times. Part I, Interuniversity collection of
scientific papers. M., 1996. - S. 109-116.
11. Groys. Nietzsche’s themes and motifs in Russian
culture of the XX century // Bakhtin collection. B. - M., 1992. - 127-131 p.
12. Hajiyev K.S. US: the evolution of bourgeois
consciousness. M., 1981. - 255 p.
13. Halevy D. Life of Friedrich Nietzsche. -
Novosibirsk: 1992, - 214 p.
14. Kauffmann Le Roy C. The influence of Friedrich
Nietzsche on American literature, Diss. U. of Pennsylvania, 1963. - 189 p.
15. Lavrov A.A. Nietzsche's philosophy //
Philosophical Sciences, 1997, N.-Y. - 38-41 p.
16. Literary History of the United States: in tree
volumes. - M .: Progress, 1979. 3., - 547 p.
17. Lunina I.E. Late stage of creativity of Jack
London. - M., 1989. - 153 p.
18. Morozkina E.A. European positivism and the
philosophical and aesthetic views Dreiser // Foreign Literature. Problem and
method. - L., 1989., - Vol. 3., - p. 33-44
19. Nietzsche and Soviet culture: Allyand adversary /
Ed. by Rosenthal B.G. Cambridge: Cambridge univer. press, 1994. - 130 p.
20. Sheng Ch. Nietzsche's Superman Americanized: on
Dreiser's "The Financier". Diss. U.of Maryland, 1989. - 194 p.
21. Sherman Stuart P. The barbaric naturalism of
Theodore Dreiser. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1965. - 128 p.
22. Vyshlenkova S.P. Ideas FV Nietzsche in the
literary consciousness of the US late XIX-early XX centuries. - Diss. cand.
filol. - M., 2010. - 205 p.
23. Zapf H. Elective affinities and American
diferrences // Nietzsche in American literature. Columbia, 1995. - P. 313-337.
24. Zhogin B.G. Literary Criticism in the United
States in the early XX. in the struggle for realism. - M., 1983.-397 p.
25. Zassoursky Y.N. American Literature of the XX
century. - M., 1984. - 927 p.