KARACHUN V.V.

NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF UKRAINE "IGOR SIKORSKY KYIV POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE"

 

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF THE TRIAXIAL GYROSTABILIZER MOTION

 

Linearized differential equations of the platform  can be written as follows [1].

;

;

;                                                 

;

;

,                                  (1)

where  moments of inertia GSP together with the gimbal relatively to the axes  respectively;  coefficients of moments of the viscous friction forces;  - the projections of the angle rate of the platform of the stabilization axis;  moments of inertia of the gyroscope moving parts relatively to the axes of precession;  the precession angles of the gyroscope;  the projections of the external moments on the stabilization axis;  kinetic momentum of the gyroscope rotors;  coefficients of viscous friction of the gimbal sensitive elements;  projections of external moments on the precession axis;  – functions characterizing the dependance between the moments of the stabilizing engines and the corresponding precession angles;  – "false" angle rate, on which reacts a float sensor element of GSP, conditioned by the influence of acoustic radiation on the gyroscope gimbal;

;

;

,                               (2)

where  moments of friction on the axes of gyroscope precession;  moments of the gyroscopes unbalance;  additional angle acceleration of a moving part of float sensitive elements caused by diffraction phenomena in the gyroscope gimbal [2]:

;

;

,        (3)

where  floats radii of i-gyroscope; Llength of floats;   moments of inertia of the moving parts of the floats relatively to the input gyroscope axis;  masses of the float ends;  bending of the butt ends under the influence of acoustic radiation; ,  –movement of the elements of the float lateral surface in the former plane ( tangential components, radial components); ; ; ; ; ; ;

  

 

;  (4)

 

 ;   ;

 

;

,

 central angle in the former plane; , [m-1] – wave number;

 pressure in the falling sound wave, dB;  (fig. 1), where [3];

; ; ; ; ;

Îïèñàíèå: 24

Fig. 1. Chart of the sound waves passing through the butt end of the float gimbal 1 - falling wave; 2 - reflected wave; 3 - passed wave

 cylindrical stiffness of the butt end;

.

Let’s assume that the aircraft fuselage causes determined perturbation, that is periodic with a constant frequency and amplitude and given non-random time functions (fig. 1)

;

;

,                                        (5)

where  quantity values of the moments;  constant components.

It is clear that consideration of the constant components of the moments will not bring the significant changes in the final results. Therefore, we assume that .

The solution of the of equations system (6.1) we will search by the method of successive approximations.

References

1.

Karachun, V.V. Vibration of Porous. Plates under the Action of Acoustic [Òåêñò] / V.V. Karachun // SOVIET APPLIED MECHANICS. – 1987. – Vol. 22, ¹3. – Ð. 236-238.

2. Mel'nik, V.N. Stress-strain state of a gyroscope suspension under acoustic loading [Òåêñò]/ V.N. Mel’nik //  2007; Strength of Materials. ISSN: 00392316. Volume: 39. Issue: 1. Pages: 24-36. Year: 2007-01-01. EID: 2-s2.0-34147198666. Scopus ID: 34147198666. DOI: 10.1007/s11223-007-0004-6.

3. Mel'nik, V.N. Influence of acoustic radiation on the sensors of a gyrostabilized platform [Òåêñò]/ V.N. Mel’nik, V.V. Karachun// 2004; Prikladnaya Mekhanika. ISSN: 00328243. Volume: 40. Issue: 10. Pages: 122-130. Year: 2004-12-01. EID: 2-s2.0-14844342416. Scopus ID: 14844342416.