! ! ! Для размещения в журнале News of Science and Education
Философия/6 Философия науки
Rakhmatullin Rafael
Bashkir State Agrarian University, Russia
Dialectics as a methodology of scientific knowledge
Dialectics is an important part of
Marxist philosophy. It forms part of such sections of Marxist philosophy as
ontology, gnoseology, social philosophy. With the destruction of the main
stronghold of Marxism-the Soviet Union, interest in this philosophy in Russia
and Eastern Europe has declined markedly. The theme "Dialectics"
disappeared from the textbooks on philosophy. We believe that such an attitude
toward dialectics as a universal theory of development is not a normal
phenomenon.
The fact is that with the phenomenon
of development people are found everywhere. Medicine
tries to unravel the laws of the development of diseases, criminology – the
causes of the growth of crime, mathematics - the laws of quantitative relations.
Hegel tried to find universal laws of development. He believed that there are
laws that relate to any processes. He called his theory of development
dialectic. In the work "Science of Logic" he formulates the laws of
dialectics, which explain the development process. The following ideas follow from these
laws:
1.
The source of development is a
contradiction. A contradiction characterizes any system. If one contradiction
disappears, then another arises. Therefore, development is universal.
2.
There is a general developmental
algorithm: quantitative changes have boundaries, both in the direction of
increasing and decreasing. If they go beyond existing boundaries, then the
system changes its quality.
3.
There is a continuity in development.
New quality is always associated with the old quality.
4.
Repeatability takes place in
development. The new is to a certain extent identical to some stage in the
evolution of the system [1, p. 84-105].
In our opinion, it is impossible to
ignore these patterns to explain and forecast existing processes. Is not
science supposed to study regularities that are global in nature? If we
consider the causes of the development of science, we will see that, in fact,
the source of the emergence of new knowledge is a contradiction. First, it
occurs when facts are found that contradict the scientific theory. This was
pointed out by I. Lakatos [2]. Secondly, science develops in discussions, when
some scientists criticize others, put forward hypotheses that contradict
existing theories.
According to the second law, the
development of the system is carried out by the accumulation of quantitative
changes. And this idea is also confirmed by the history of science. It is known
that with the increase in the number of certain phenomena (diseases,
earthquakes, economic crises, etc.), it becomes necessary to study them. And the
more these facts influence society, the more energy is devoted to their
research.
According to the third idea of
dialectics, the new state of the system largely depends on its
old state. With scientific research, we can not ignore the achievements of the
previous science, its methods, ideas, ways of substantiation and refutation.
Even A. Einstein said that he could not have created relativistic mechanics
without the classical mechanics of I. Newton. The explanation of the culture of
a certain people is impossible without taking into account the history of this
people.
According to the fourth idea of
dialectics, the evolution of any system is accompanied by the
appearance of such states of it, which are similar to those that have already
been encountered in its history. For example, if a farmer sows wheat, a few
months later, 15-20 new grains are obtained from this grain. And they look like
the wheat grain from which they turned out. In science, this pattern is
observed. For example, in the history of philosophy, we observe how
philosophers constantly return to the theory of Plato's ideas. At first
Plotinus did it, then Hegel, then D. Lukach. Philosophy of Plato used and K.G.
Jung in his doctrine of archetypes. This is, in particular, written by her student
A. Jaffe [3]. In 1975, Mandelbrot created a theory of fractals, which very much
resembles the theory of Plato's ideas [4; 5].
There is an opinion that synergetics
has now replaced dialectics.. In our opinion, synergetics is a variant of the
interpretation of dialectics. For example, according to synergetics, the cause
of the development of the system is its loss of equilibrium, the emergence of
an unstable state. But, from the point of view of dialectics, this is the
manifestation of a contradiction between the two states of the system-the new
and the old. If the scientific theory is unstable, then there is a need for its
development!
In dialectics, there are other
heuristic methods that can be used in scientific cognition. They relate to the
ideas of causality, the influence of form on content, nominalism and realism,
the nature of randomness, etc.
Literature:
1. Абдуллин А.Р., Рахматуллин Р.Ю. История и
философия науки // пособие для аспирантов. Уфа:
Восточный институт экономики, гуманитарных наук, упр. и права, 2007. 152
с.
2. Лакатос И. Избранные произведения по философии и
методологии науки. М.: Академический проект, 2008. 475 с.
3. Яффе А. Наука и подсознание // Юнг К. Г. и др. Человек и
его символы. М.: Серебряные нити, 1997. С. 303-312.
4. Мандельброт Б. Фрактальная геометрия природы. Ижевск: ИКИ,
2010. 656 с.
5. Рахматуллин Р.Ю. Фрактальная концепция творчества // Исторические,
философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и
искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики. 2015. № 7-1 (57). С. 145-147.