Ôèëîñîôñêèå íàóêè/3. Èñòîðèÿ ôèëîñîôèè
ph. d., associate
professor, Sharova M. A.
Kaluga State
University named after K. Tsiolkovsky, Russia
THE
ANALYSIS OF CATEGORY «REPRESENTATION» IN THE PHILOSOPHICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL VIEWS OF I. A. CHISTOVICH
I.A. Chistovich (1828 – 1893) –
the representative of the theistic philosophy, a graduate, then Professor of
St. Petersburg theological Academy, a prominent scientist, a prominent Church
and public figure, awarded with many state prizes and awards. So, for the work «Course
in experimental psychology» (1868), recognized on the basis of the opinion of
the Ministry of national education as a psychology textbook in all the
seminaries, he was awarded the St. Macarius prize (1869). A. P. Lopukhin
thought this tutorial was the result of scientific and pedagogical work of a
thinker in the St. Petersburg theological Academy (1851 - 1873) and the
Imperial school of jurisprudence (1866-1882), where I.A. Chistovich continued
reading course in psychology after resigned for health reasons A.A. Fisher [2].
Taking the traditions of German
classical philosophy (H. Hegel, I. Fichte, F. Schelling), he identified the
goal of psychological knowledge - the knowledge of the truths of the existing
through experiments: the natural and the metaphysical, connected to the
ultimate source of existence – God. In his views can be traced to the synthetism
create an organic model of the «new psychology», which could evolve in
accordance with the best achievements of empirical psychology and physiology,
without abandoning the basic principles of theistic anthropology. A.
Alekseevskiy recognized the synthesis of philosophical and psychological
knowledge for the second half of the XIX century is obvious, as «modern
educated society ... addicted to the natural Sciences waiting from them some
solution of all the «eternal questions», now survived the heat of first passion
and feeling some disappointment in his most recent idol, turns again to
philosophy» [1, p. 811, 815].
I.A. Chistovich, using
scientific writing style (obviously the influence of his brother - physician J.
A. Chistovich) stops at the physiological processes in the body. So, body
consciousness and mental activity he believed hemisphere of the brain («the
lower surface of the brain ... contains the centres from which come all head
brain nerves. Brain hemispheres are ... body consciousness and mental activity»
[3, p. 17]). But synthesizing cardiogenetics tradition of Russian religious philosophy
(P.D. Yurkevich, I.M. Skvortsov, V.N. Karpov) and the latest achievements of
natural science, he recognized the presence of a hub (= heart), coordinating all
shipments of the spiritual life («...it is difficult to separate sensation from
feeling, because ... many cardiac movements more or less mixed kind» [3, p.
183]). The external impression, acting on the body, enters the soul and excites
the nerve, which conveys impressions to the nerve center (the brain) where it
awakens a sense corresponding to the original excitation.
Mental processes mapping the
sensory world and recreating the image of objects and phenomena after they have
ceased to operate are view. I.A. Chistovich described the view from the
standpoint of physiology, as a mental image of the object, sensed by monitoring
and keeping the «footprint» in the cerebral cortex of the brain, after
excitation of the Central nervous system in the perception. They built a system
of ideas based on: 1) perception, when the power of representation is much
weaker than the sensory image of the subject; 2) thinking, where the generated
ideas are highly abstract; 3) imagination, in which there is a substitution
sensual feeling fantastic images (so, «in my childhood, we
often heard from others mixed in our own experiences» [3, p. 47]). In the
representative system, he identified the following types of representations:
visual, auditory, olfactory, gustatory, tactile.
The sense of light and color I.A.
Chistovich attributed to the visual organ, but is available to human perception
of color was represented as a «color scale», abroad where light was detected
only as a chemical compound. Therefore, where one does not see eastermost
senses, begins the analytical consciousness (= spirit). «... at the entrance to
the garden, smelling the aroma of... we immediately present mental flowers and
looking through their eyes» [3, p. 30]. Therefore, the clarity of vision he
believed the subjective sense of consciousness.
By I.A. Chistovich, the organ of
hearing responds to: the height, power and quality of sound, applies where the
eye is not available tangibility of the subject. However, in the process of
mental formation of visual impressions to be assimilated by consciousness is
much stronger than the impressions of the hearing. I.A. Chistovich considered
as an external vision and hearing – as the inner side of the cognitive faculties
of the soul.
Taste and smell are the basis of
the psychophysiology of perception and more rooted in sensual – practical field
than previous bodies. I. A. Chistovich
drew attention to the fact that, although the smell and helps to restore the
memory image of the object, but almost impossible to remember the smell, just
as we restore mentally the image or sound. The sense of smell and taste called
the chemical senses because their receptors respond to molecular signals («depend
on the chemical changes of saliva» [3, p. 35]).
In the psychology of touch I.A.
Chistovich ascended to the philosophy of Aristotle, for the first time provided
it as a source of tactile information about the space and the mechanical
property of objects. Touch it recognized the movements that occur: 1) randomly,
with the application of willpower, or 2) involuntarily. Voluntary movements
implied a certain act of will, extending to the arousal and direction of
movements. Involuntary movements had the character: 1) reflexive occurring as a
result of sensual arousal, and 2) automatic, without a certain arousal.
I.A. Chistovich wrote that «performances,
educated soul would be the property of the soul and stored it in the
continuation of all life ... in irresponsible <unconscious, M. A. Sharova> state» [3, Pp. 48 - 49]. And
only to the extent necessary, an unconscious way may become the property of
consciousness, coming from secret depths of the soul, as the loss of the need
to return to the sphere of the unconscious. How ambiguous representations arise
in consciousness, I.A. Chistovich concluded that the difference in their degree
of proximity to consciousness. Reliable research method ideas he believed
introspection, through which is revealed the play of consciousness is not one,
and the associations of ideas, and the condition for their occurrence is the
connection between them («the way harder ... kept in memory when impressions of
the individual parts are linked ...» [3, p. 51]).
Thanks to the consciousness of
the person experiences the various manifestations of the soul, raises the kinds
of feelings (pleasant, unpleasant, mixed), similar in characteristic to the
sensations. Most of them to consciousness went unnoticed, except for those that
face barriers in mental activities. He wrote that the influence of physical
processes at the heart of the state cannot be separated from their impact on
the mental state of a person (e.g., hunger, irritation of the nerves or the
physiological sense), so «a heart of the movement more or less mixed kind» [3,
p. 183].
In the mainstream of Russian
religious philosophy, he laid down the intangible essence and the beginning of
the phenomena of the spiritual life, expressed through categories: singleness,
simplicity, indivisibility. The positive quality of the soul, I.A. Chistovich
recognized: introspection, self-awareness, self-determination, a capacity for
feeling. In philosophical and psychological thinker man has established itself
not only as a passive entity, receiving impressions from the outside world, but
self-start, converts them according to the laws of their spiritual nature. The
soul claimed the life force unconsciously and involuntarily creates a living
organism that manages its physical processes, indicating that the formation of
the whole organism (the body) is already preceded by the formation of separate
parts, being present in the unit cell of the ideal, opportunity. Developing,
the soul begins to realize the changes in the body and in the outside world,
and with the emergence of consciousness, the soul manifested as the beginning
of psychic phenomena. Therefore the soul, as the beginning is by nature
immaterial and indivisible, in relation to the body is completely original, but
the body in relation to the soul - original concerning.
Spirit he understood the special
nature in man by the soul, the scope of the principles that distinguish man
from animals: 1) the criteria the knowledge of the truth; 2) moral activities;
3) the totality of the aesthetic and religious feelings. «The human soul, which
is conscious of itself in its activities as an acting agent, samoustraniajutsia
and evaluates his life by the ideas of the true, good and beautiful, and is
called the spirit» [3, p. 218]. I.A. Chistovich distinguish empirical (=
sensual) and spiritual consciousness: the first – still inherent in man and
animal (in the early stages of the evolution of man, like animal, have not
separated themselves from nature, consequently, had no consciousness); the
second – formed according to the spiritual growth of the individual and was
opened in him of the consciousness of himself as a person and his motives («when
... thinking being the man turned into a spirit, then man, or his spirit began
to distinguish itself from the body» [3, p. 219]). «Ever since man first become
conscious of itself, and said about himself: that's me, and about the nature:
it's not me, since his relationship with her is over. Of the things he became
man, from organic member of the world – his Lord. The world instantly fell
apart for him into two halves -- one I, the other something that is beyond me,
the world internal and external, subjective and objective» [3, p. 222]). For
the self-aware soul body was made by not only the external object but the means
by which it is in active communication with the outside world and its own ideal
notions reflected in matter. The human spirit as self-conscious start,
distinguishes itself from the variety of spiritual life. I.A. Chistovich
concluded that the life of the soul begins before the life of the spirit, and
the self-conscious spirit affects the body consciously and deliberately. The
connection of mental phenomena with their internal knowledge in the philosophy
of I.A. Chistovich were the common and main form of mental life called
consciousness.
His work «Course in experimental
psychology» meant the attempt of logical – philosophical research of the foundations
of psychological knowledge, the detection of the sources of the psyche, which
consists of the unity of sensory experience and of the metaphysical realities
of existence.
Literature:
1. Alexis A. Student psychological society at
the St. Petersburg Theological Academy // Christian reading. 1903. ¹. 5. P. 811 - 815
2. Lopukhin A. P. in memory of the historian of
the St. Petersburg Theological Academy A. I. Chistovich: Obituary (extract from
the Ecclesiastical Gazette No. 45 of 1893). SPb. 1893. 11 s.
3. Chistovich I.A. Course of experimental
psychology. SPb. 1868. 272 s.