Political
science/10. Regional political processes
Frolov A.
The second year student
The Moscow State University
The Singing Revolution and its influence on Baltic Russians
This year
Lithuania and Latvia celebrate the victory over Soviet troops that was 25 years
ago. This period of time is quite big and now we are to understand who Russians
in the Baltic States are. Rats or not?
What is more important: has 25 years of independence changed anything in
their life and mind or not?
Nowadays a lot of people in Russia use a collocation “The Near Abroad”.
What does it mean? This term is absolutely new, it helps Russian politicians
identify post-Soviet countries. There are 12 countries which signed the
Alma-Ata protocol on 21 December 1991, with many of them Russia has no border.
Norway, the DPRK, Finland, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, China, Estonia are not so
close to Russians. That’s a very serious problem because President Putin talks
a lot about relationships with the Near Abroad but never about other neighbors.
In the case of difficulties Russians faced in the Baltic States it looks like
hushing up the problem.
Different ethnical groups have always lived near the Baltic Sea. Their
impact on indigenous nations was different but
only two of them have become the objects of hatred: the Germans and the
Russians. The Germans have had such reputation for centuries. The Russians got
this dubious achievement only after the Second World War.
A huge flow of migrants from
Russia threatened Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians. They didn’t want any
assimilation with Russians and it led to negative reaction. But 30 years of
common life smoothed over a lot of contradictions: the Russians worked and lived
as the Russians, the Baltic nations worked and lived as the Baltic nations.
They could live absolutely separately, a famous Russian sociologist Simonyan notes that almost all
industrial plants in the Baltic states were established on the principle of monoethnicity, districts of new towns were Russian-speaking,
districts of old towns were native-language-speaking. It means that, for
example, the Latvians could know only their language and be very successful.
There were two worlds: Russian and Baltic. They lived independently from each
other. Perestroika was a moment when those two worlds united to conquer
independence for Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.
Today in Russian media
everyone can very often read that the Russians didn’t want the USSR collapse.
It’s a blatant lie. Mr. Putin wants Russian to think that the West has stolen
their strong Red Empire’s glory. But this big empire was a quasi-state in the
beginning of the 1990s. Lithuania as the richest republic started fighting for
sovereignty first. Latvia and Estonia joined later. It wasn’t a war against
Russia. It was the battle against the Soviet regime in which Lithuanians,
Latvians, Estonians and Russians fought side by side. Together they organized
the Baltic Way, defended the Radio and Television Committee
building in Vilnius. There were some Russians in revolutionary
governments, for example, Anatolijs Gorbunovs who was the Supreme Council of the Republic of Latvia.
As usual, the triumph uncoupled friends: 1992 was the
year of Baltic nationalism. Latvia and Estonia banned Russian press, gave
absolutely no political rights for the Russians, Lithuanian government was more
clever, they just banned Russian part of
the Sąjūdis and gave
citizenship for all the Russians. Boris Yeltsin and his government didn’t want
(or couldn’t) defend their compatriots from discrimination, 10 years later some
politicians admitted that it was a betrayal. I can’t prove this statement, but
I can agree that Russia did nothing to protect its citizens.
It’s quite difficult to live
without faith in the future because you know that nobody wants to help you. The
Baltic Russians couldn’t work in the sphere of civil service, had no money to
leave their homeland, so their started to earn money doing business. Many plants became their property ten years
later. Nowadays thousands of Russians work for Russian
employers because these rich men don’t forget to help their nation.
Today the Russian community
in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia can be a brilliant object to scientific
study. Under normal circumstances, a
Russian will never help his or her compatriot, will try to assimilate with
culture of country he or she lives in. Also typical post-Soviet men are very
conservative, their attitude to capitalism is very negative. But it isn’t about
the Baltic Russians. They are leaders of Baltic capitalism, saviors of Russian
culture; they will never leave anybody in the lurch. Simonyan called them
“Neither Russians nor Europeans”.
What does the future hold
for this atypical ethnic group? There
are 3 approaches: optimistic, pessimistic, realistic.
Optimists think that the
Russian Balts as the most cultural developed Russian group in Europe will
become a very important part of European culture. They will be an ambassador of
Russian civilization.
Pessimists think that the
Russian Balts are not able to be an independent part of Russian culture for a
long time. They will cease to be something special thanks to constant contacts
with their historical homeland.
In my opinion, both of these
ways are wrong. They will never become a reality. The Russian Balts are destined to be strangers
for Balts. They can’t become typical Russians because of the memory about their
history when Russia forgot them. They can’t change attitude to capitalism
because it helps them be a very important part of the society. An English researcher and professor of
Cambridge Anatol Lieven writes ”Russians
in the Baltic States can’t associate themselves with Russia because many of
them have never been in Russia and can’t associate themselves with Lithuania,
Latvia and Estonia because they are ethnical Russian”.
What does it mean for the
World’s culture? It isn’t good or bad, I suppose. We can study this nice
example of a new big ethnic group that was formed by geography, unusual
historical memory and economy.
Bibliography
1.
Anatol Lieven. The Baltic revolution. Estonia, Latvia,
Lithuania and the Path to Independence. Yale University Press New Heaven and
London. 1993
2. Ðîññèÿ è Áàëòèÿ: ýïîõà ïåðåìåí
(1914-1924). Ì.: ÈÂÈ ÐÀÍ. 2002
3. Ð.Õ.Ñèìîíÿí. Ðîññèÿ è ñòðàíû Áàëòèè. Ì.:Academia. 2003