Ìàòàñîâà È.Í.,
Õóäèê Þ.È.
Êàðàãàíäèíñêèé ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé óíèâåðñèòåò èì. àêàä.
Å.À. Áóêåòîâà,
ã.
Êàðàãàíäà, Êàçàõñòàí
Linguistic and pragmatic parameters of the
political metaphor in the modern English-language press
At the present stage
of the development of linguistics, metaphor is the key to the formation of
public opinion; it also serves as a way of expressing the author’s assessment
in foreign media using the example of various newspaper
articles that are devoted to the relationship between society and the state.
Metaphor is a trope that allows us to create at the right moment the necessary
associative links, which, in their turn, help to mitigate the negative reaction
of society to the information that provokes doubt.
In the electronic
version of the “Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language” by S.I.
Ozhegov, the following definition is given: “Metaphor is a hidden figurative
comparison, the assimilation of one thing, phenomenon to another one” [1].
The following
definition is provided in the book “Characteristics of the political discourse”
authored by Sineokaya N.A.: “Political discourse is a form of policy-making,
i.e. political action or in other words a combination of political and speech
action together” [2].
This article is
devoted to the study of the frequently used political metaphors in the modern
English-language press. According to the Russian linguist Beztsennaya Zh.P.,
nowadays cognitive science studies metaphor as the main mental process, as a
way of understanding, structuring and interpreting the world. A person explains
his thoughts with the help of metaphors, and also thinks with metaphors, shapes
his world using metaphors [3, P.
24-26].
Proceeding from the fact that the political metaphor in the speech of
politicians is a special device for discovering people’s reaction to
innovation, we in our work have set the following tasks: to determine the main
role of political metaphor, to analyze the concept of “political metaphor”, to
study various classifications, categories and functions of political metaphor.
For this reason, we have conducted a practical analysis of the use of
political metaphor in the media from the point of view of its belonging to
different classifications.
Our main goal was to study the use of political metaphor in the
English-language modern press and prove its importance for a better
understanding of the political situation in the English-speaking countries.
To conduct practical analysis, we have selected, as well as studied
various examples of political metaphor in the article by Karen Deyang “European
officials criticize Republican letter to Iran” [4].
Metaphors were analyzed in terms of their belonging to different
classifications, namely:
- functions of metaphors (cognitive, nominative, evaluative, modeling,
instrumental, communicative, pragmatic, aesthetic);
- semantic types of political metaphors (anthropomorphic,
naturemorphic, sociomorphic, artifact).
In the future, we will analyze the classification of metaphors by O.G.
Ananchenko in terms of their involvement in the following categories: sports,
theatrical, culinary, health care, military, negative [5, P.10].
Our choice is due to the fact that the first classification allows us
to pay attention to the “complexity” of metaphors used in the text and to
highlight what kind of feeling they are designed to inspire, and the second
classification allows us to link the theme of the metaphor to the subject
matter of the text.
The most important function, in our opinion, is the cognitive one,
because it has been found out that metaphors often have a pronounced expressive
emotional coloring designed to persuade the reader to a certain type of
perception of the information being given. The following examples can be provided:
“Suddenly, Iran can say to us: ‘Are your proposals actually trustworthy
if 47 senators say that no matter what the government agrees to, we can subsequently
take it off the table?’, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said during
a visit to Washington”. - «Íåïîíÿòíî îòêóäà Èðàí ìîæåò ãîâîðèòü íàì: «Äåéñòâèòåëüíî ëè âàøè ïðåäëîæåíèÿ çàñëóæèâàþò äîâåðèÿ, åñëè 47 ñåíàòîðîâ óòâåðæäàþò, ÷òî íåçàâèñèìî îò òîãî, ÷òî ïðàâèòåëüñòâî ðåøèò, ñåíàòîðû äàííîå ðåøåíèå íå ïîääåðæàò?», - ñêàçàë âî âðåìÿ âèçèòà â Âàøèíãòîí ìèíèñòð èíîñòðàííûõ äåë Ãåðìàíèè Ôðàíê-Âàëüòåð Øòàéíìàéåð».
The metaphor is “take it off the table” (i.e. out of sight, out of
mind), but the meaning in this context will be the following: no matter what
decision the government takes, 47 senators will pretend that this decision was
not taken.
According to its semantic classification, this is the artifact
metaphor; according to the thematic belonging it is of technical nature and fulfills
a cognitive function in the sentence.
Using the example of Karen Deyang’s article, we have analyzed ten
examples of the political metaphor in accordance with the semantic
classification, thematic categories of belonging and functions.
An analysis of the materials collected has shown that, according to the
semantic type, the most frequently used are anthropomorphic metaphors closely
related to the concept of man. We have found out that, by the subject matter,
the most frequently used metaphors in the article are military, medical and
technical.
Equally, the article manifests nominative, instrumental and
communicative functions, as well as the other ones. Certain political metaphors
by their semantic load reveal expressive characteristics of various objects, as
well as phenomena, the evaluation and imagery of the speech of political
conversation. We also have made our subjective conclusion
that this work will be useful to both students and teachers of the English
language.
Literature:
1. Electronic version of the “Explanatory dictionary
of the Russian language” by Ozhegov S. I. - Ì: Russian language, 2000 [electronic resource]. -
Access mode. - URL: http://www.ozhegov.com/words/15735.shtml (application date is 02.12.2017).
2. Sineokaya N.A. Characteristics of the political
discourse // Modern problems of science and education. - 2012. - No. 6. - URL: https://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=7695 (application date
is 02.12.2017).
3. Beztsennaya Zh. P. The role of metaphor in the political
discourse [electronic resource] / Beztsennaya Zh. P. //
Bulletin of Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University. - 2007. - No.
36. - P. 24-26. – Access mode: http://elibrary.ru, (application date
is 02.12.2017).
4. The electronic version of Karen
Deyang’s article “European officials criticize Republican letter to Iran”. - Access mode. -
URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/european-allies-join-in-criticism-of-republican-letter-to (application date is 02.12.2017).
5. Ananchenko O.G. Evaluative metaphors in newspaper texts of the beginning
of the XXI century. - Maykop, 2011. - P. 10.