Psychology and sociology
/1. The psychology of terrorism
Ê.g.n. Plyushch I.V.
The Siberian state space
university of M. F. Reshetnyov,
the Siberian federal
university, Russia
UNDERVALUATION OF SOCIAL AND
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TERRORISM
Terrorism
as a global problem performs relatively recently – with the last decades of the
twentieth century. In the twentieth century we see the spread and strengthening
of terrorism, especially the social conditions of life of modern society is
deepening challenges – urbanization, migration, mass media, rapid transport,
availability of Internet technologies, etc.
Terrorism as a
method of social pressure has very ancient origins, in the historical documents
known to describe the terrorist acts of sicarii groups that operated in
Palestine in 66-73 years BC[1, p. 125]. Even then there was a sharp divergence
of assessments of this activity when one idealizes terrorism, the other is
demonized. Such a polarity assessments regarding terrorism and terrorists can
be traced throughout the history of mankind up to our days, when, for example,
the "Arab street" new York rejoiced at the tragic for the rest of the
population the events of 11 September 2001, Perhaps this feature of perception
reflect certain essential qualitative characteristic of the phenomenon that
does not depend on external conditions of implementation.
The main purpose of
terrorism is to impact on a wide range of people, not the killing of specific
individuals. In other words, terrorism is primarily a means of psychological
impact, in which murder is only an instrument of influence. Act of terror is
aimed at intimidation and psychological oppression of others, its main object –
not those who fell victim and those who survived. According to the American
political science the concept of terrorism is "the threat or use of
violence ... when such actions are intended to influence more people than the
direct victim [2, c. 565]. Accordingly, terrorism is the strategy of action,
based on the principle of the acceptability of violence, the physical
destruction of people to achieve their own goals-or psychological
characteristic of a person.
Terrorism as a
modern social phenomenon develops outside the framework of a particular
religion, ethnic group, country or region. Independence from specific social
realities can be considered terrorism a cultural phenomenon, manifested as
ethnic extremism.
Terrorism has
emerged as a socio-psychological technology of political pressure several years
ago and, in fact, not changing, was used until the beginning of the twentieth
century. In the basis of the use of this technology will continue to drive
socio-psychological characteristics: the use of youth as a tool of
psychological pressure on large groups of people, reliance on emotion, not
reason. Ignoring these characteristics reduces the efficiency of the fight
against terrorism. As a consequence, counteraction to terrorism is carried out
not preemptively but as a reaction to the accomplished facts. Such a strategy
is inevitably doomed to lag behind. This contributes to the international
character of terrorism.
The extent and
peculiarities of implementation of modern terrorism lead to the impossibility
of countering this phenomenon in the framework of the States. This is an area
of modern society, which is implemented at the international level more
actively than the state. Modern terrorism is growing faster than the
international system of counteraction. Terrorism develops as a supranational,
supra-state international phenomenon.
Terrorism always
developed primarily as a form of group crime. But in the twenty-first century
has marked a brand new trend within the terrorist approach is the formation of
a unified holistic concept of strategic planning. For example, for years
defined the following priorities – the full spread of the ideology of
terrorism, creation of the system of ideological impact on children, the use of
information and interactive technologies. Terrorists actively use the
attraction of the most susceptible to psychological treatment of social groups
– children and adolescents. Among the age psychological features of children,
determining their vulnerability to such propaganda include: the lack of
awareness of the value of life, the desire to be a hero, to attract attention,
high emotionality, lack of sustained moral guidelines, etc. is added At
teenagers need to Express themselves, a painful sense of underestimation of the
self, the need to radically change the surrounding, etc.
That terrorist
organizations are starting to implement projects against child bring them to
their activities as martyrs. Within the same region (Palestine) actually
designed a single, integrated educational system of children involved in
terrorist activities. The permanent influence of schools, mosques, mass media,
parent and community meetings calling for self-sacrifice, — tools for creating
young martyrs. The effectiveness of the methods and technologies confirm the
statistics. According to opinion polls over 70% of Palestinian children state
that hope to become suicide bombers [3]. This confirms information from other
sources - mark Sageman, after reviewing investigative materials to more than
500 known terrorists, shows that 60 % of these terrorists attended the same 12
mosques with aggressive servants [4]. We can state as a fact the validity of
the ideological programme of terrorists. Of course, the necessary program of
ideological resistance and the development of other ideological systems for
children and adolescents. But whether for many children and their parents, for
their victims too late by that time, the international community will agree on
the areas of interest on the legislation?
Literature:
1. Belkov O. A. Terrorism - a challenge to national
and international security // Security of Eurasia. 2001. No. 4. P.215.
2. Macionis J. Sociology. St. Petersburg, 2004. S.
565.
3. The website "Israel" //
www.isralife.info/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=5908
4. Website of Institute for public planning /
http://www.inop.ru/reading/borba/ 25.01.2005.