Prof.,
Doctor of Agricultural Science M. Sychov
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences
of Ukraine
Digestibility
of Nutrients Feed in Quail According to Various Levels of Fat in Feed
It
is known [3] that the character lipid metabolism in the body of the bird is
conditioned by many factors, depending on their species, age [2], physiological
condition, breed. However, one of the most important among them is the subject
animal feeding [4]. Digestion is the first stage of metabolism.
As
for the digestion of fat, this process occurs mainly in the proximal part of
the small intestine, the limited hydrolysis of esters containing fatty acids
with short and medium-length chains. Physiological properties of fat emulsion
that enters the intestines from the stomach, changing after mixing with bile,
pancreatic juice and the secrets of the small intestine. PH content of the
proximal part of the small intestine, where most digestion occurs fat, increased
to 5,8-6,5 [1].
Diets
with different carbohydrate unequally affect the speed of advancement of the
feed mass in the digestive canal [6]. Adding fat to the feed leads to a
slowdown in the speed of the advance and improve food digestion of carbohydrates.
[5] Similar results were obtained in determining the efficiency of different
fats depending on the level of glucose in the diet. It is believed that excess
quantities of energy exchange due respect to gross nonlipid intense
assimilation of the diet components.
So
the question digestibility of nutrients in feed quail and influence on this
process at different levels of fat in the fodder is essential both theoretical
and practical importance.
Material and methods research. The material for scientific and economic experiments were Pharaoh quail
species. Experiments were carried out by groups analogs. The general scheme of
studies presented in Table 1. According to the scheme used daily poultry age at
which the principle of analogues was formed three groups: control and two
experimental.
The
main experiment period lasted 49 days and was divided by age into 4
sub-periods: 1-21 and 22-35, 36-42 and 43-49 days each.
Test
herd of young quail kept in single-stage cellular batteries. Landing area per
head was 73.5 cm2, the front feeding - 1.5 cm. Irrigated bird with
vacuum bowls. Options microclimate in the poultry house answered the specified
requirements.
1.
Scheme of the experiment
|
Group |
Poultry at the Beginning of the Experiment, heads |
The Level of Crude Fat in Feed,% |
|
1 |
100 |
5 |
|
2 |
100 |
3 |
|
3 |
100 |
7 |
Subjects
were young quail meat fed full-feed, balanced for all nutrients according to
recommended standards.
As
part of the feed for quail control and experimental groups and set the number
of ingredients were unequal due to the fact that develop feed with different
levels of crude fat without changing the quantitative composition of animal
feed is impossible. Forage mixture prevailed in the structure of grain feed and
soybean cake and meal.
The
chemical composition of animal feed that was used for feeding quail control and
experimental groups was diverse and came close only crude fat content (Table.
2).
2.
The content of energy and essential nutrients in 100 kg of feed
|
Ïîêàçíèê |
Age of quaisl, days |
|||||
|
1–21 |
22–49 |
|||||
|
Group |
||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
ME, kcal |
290,0 |
290,0 |
300,6 |
299,0 |
295,0 |
309,6 |
|
Crude Fat, g |
5,0 |
3,0 |
7,0 |
5,0 |
3,0 |
7,0 |
|
Crude Fiber, g |
4,2 |
4,2 |
4,2 |
4,29 |
4,29 |
4,29 |
|
Crude Protein,
g |
27,5 |
27,5 |
27,5 |
20,5 |
20,5 |
20,5 |
|
Linolenic acid, g |
1,62 |
1,01 |
2,51 |
1,90 |
1,15 |
2,90 |
|
Met, g |
0,65 |
0,65 |
0,66 |
0,46 |
0,44 |
0,46 |
|
Met+Cys, g |
1,00 |
1,00 |
1,00 |
0,75 |
0,75 |
0,75 |
|
Lis, g |
1,68 |
1,68 |
1,68 |
1,11 |
1,11 |
1,11 |
|
Thr,g |
1,00 |
1,07 |
1,01 |
0,75 |
0,77 |
0,75 |
|
Try,g |
0,33 |
0,35 |
0,32 |
0,23 |
0,26 |
0,23 |
|
Calcium, g |
1,00 |
1,00 |
1,00 |
1,00 |
1,00 |
1,00 |
|
Phosphorus, g |
0,80 |
0,80 |
0,80 |
0,80 |
0,80 |
0,80 |
|
Sodium, g |
0,25 |
0,25 |
0,25 |
0,25 |
0,25 |
0,25 |
|
Vitamin A, IU |
1500 |
1500 |
1500 |
700 |
700 |
700 |
|
Vitamin Å, mg |
2,0 |
2,0 |
2,0 |
0,50 |
0,50 |
0,50 |
|
Vitamin D3, IU |
300 |
300 |
300 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
The
difference in feeding poultry control and experimental groups was determined by
various levels of crude fat in the diet. Bird control (1st) group received a
complete feed containing 5% crude fat. The level of crude fat in the diets of
2nd and 3rd research groups regulated by the introduction of additional feed
sunflower oil, as well as changing the quantitative composition of ingredients
to the total content of its consistent scheme experiment. Combined used in a
dry powdery form.
Results. The data in Table
3 show that by feeding quail 2nd group feed with 3% Crude Fat digestibility
coefficients of Crude Protein decreased in the first age period - by 6,9% (p
<0.05), Crude Fat - by 3,6% (p <0.05); the second - by 2,7 and 6,1% (p
<0.05). However, there is a tendency to lower organic matter digestibility
and fiber.
3.
Digestibility of nutrients%
|
Group |
Organic
Matter |
Protein |
Fat |
Fiber |
NFR |
|
Age of 15–21-days |
|||||
|
1 |
82,3±0,68 |
85,9±0,17 |
92,9±0,17 |
6,1±0,35 |
83,3±1,03 |
|
2 |
80,2±0,39 |
79,0±0,40* |
89,3±0,24* |
4,5±0,20 |
83,9±0,84 |
|
3 |
78,5±0,41 |
78,1±0,49* |
90,6±0,24 |
4,7±0,34 |
81,8±0,95 |
|
Age of 36–42-days |
|||||
|
1 |
81,5±,36 |
78,5±1,02 |
92,4±0,94 |
6,1±0,17 |
86,5±0,72 |
|
2 |
80,5±0,34 |
75,8±1,50 |
86,3±0,80 |
5,5±0,30 |
86,2±0,82 |
|
3 |
78,0±0,98 |
74,2±1,22 |
91,5±0,49 |
5,1±0,26 |
82,7±1,05 |
The
bird 3rd group the first age period decreased levels of protein digestibility
by 7.8% and there was a trend to lower organic matter digestibility, fat, fiber
and NFR.
Conclusions.
So as reducing the amount of fat in compound feed from 5 to 3%, and increase
its content is 7% decrease digestibility of protein and fat in young 15-21-day
age on 6,1-6,9 and 2,3 3.6% respectively.
References
1.
Borgstrom
B. Fatdigestionandabsorption / B. Borgstrom // JnBiomembrancs. – 1974. – Vol. 48. –
P.555–620.
2.
Developmentalchangesintheactivitiesofperoxisomalandmitochondrial
beta-oxidationinchickenliver / Ishii H., Ishii S., Suga Ò., Kazama M. //
ArchivesBiochem. &Biophys. – 1985. – Vol 237. – ¹ 1. – P. 151–159.
3.
Donaldson W. E. Lipidmetabolisminliverofchicks: responsetofeeding
/ W. E. Donaldson // PoultSci. – 1990. –Vol. 69. – ¹7. – P. 1183–1187.
4.
Kilburn
J.
Theresponseofbroilerstothefeedingofmashorpelleteddietscontainingmaizeofvaryingparticlesizes
/ J. Kilburn, H. M. Jr. Edwards // BrPoultSci. – 2001. – Ìùäþ 42 (4).
– P. 484–492.
5.
Mateos
G. G. Influenceoffatandcarbohydratesourceonrateoffoodpassageof
semi-purifieddietsforlayinghens / G. G. Mateos, J. L. Sell // Poult.
Sci. – 1981. – Vol. 60. – P. 2114–2119.
6.
Tuckey R. Dietandtherateoffoodpassageinthegrowingchick /
R. Tuckey, B. E. March, J. Biely // Poult. Sci. – 1958. –Vol. 37. – P. 786–792.