Law/5. Criminal law and criminology

Zhadan V.N.
PhD in Law, Associate Professor

Kazan Federal University, Elabuga Institute, Russia

On the criminological characteristics of ecological crime in Russia

 

Abstract. The article discusses criminological characteristics of ecological crime in Russia based on the analysis of official statistics, theoretical principles of Russian legislation, scientific approaches and the author's understanding.

Key words: criminological characteristics of ecological crime, Russia, analysis, statistics, theoretical principles, legislation and approaches.

 

In the XXI century "one of the most pressing overarching issues facing the international community is the protection of the natural environment. The impact of man and his activities in different fields on the environment has increased so much and continues to grow that the world community as a crucial component of international (universal) and the national security of each state assigns to environmental safety" [1, p. 515]. Is no exception in this regard and the Russian Federation (further – Russian, Russian Federation), and therefore the necessary regulatory, institutional and technical conditions allow to prevent possible threats to health and human life, pollution of air, earth, bowels, soils, superficial and underground waters, and also the further existence of flora and fauna in Russia.

As you know, the incident in Russia since 90-ies of XX century reforms in the political and socio-economic spheres led to the development of new market relations, providing for the de-monopolization of the state and establishing a multiplicity of forms of ownership, freedom of enterprise and other economic activities. However, this process was not only complex and economically unstable, which caused negative effects in socio-economic terms [2, p. 664], but also entailed, along with other negative consequences of a large increase not only the economic and organized and environmental crime, including the emergence of new types of crimes in this category [3, p. 387].

The analysis of criminological and criminal-legal characteristics of environmental crime subject of many scientific works in the domestic legal literature [4-8]. This interest is not accidental, as the environmental protection, preventing and combating environmental violations and crimes are important tasks of state bodies and organizations in Russia, as evidenced by, for example, decrees of the President of the Russian Federation on carrying out in 2013 the Year of environmental protection in 2017 – the year of the environment.

The subject of this review will have some questions about the criminological characteristics of ecological crime in Russia, and is a continuation of previously published materials, "Current issues of criminological characteristics of ecological crime", "On the development of legislation on environmental crimes", "Criminal-legal analysis of environmental crime in Russia" and others. In the course of consideration of criminological analysis of environmental crime authors will be partially used previously published materials.

On the basis of the specified subject of interest the following questions: what socially dangerous acts are defined as environmental crime; what is the current state, the proportion and dynamics of ecological crimes in Russia; what are the causes and conditions that lead to environmental crimes; some criminological features characterize the personality of offenders; measures taken to prevent crimes in this category?

In accordance with article 42 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation [9] every citizen has the right to favourable environment, reliable information about its condition and on compensation of the damage caused to his health or property by ecological offence. Consequently, the protection of this right is one of the priorities of the state.

A wide range of offences in the sphere of the environment, as well as a high degree of importance of environmental activities determined the need for independent allocation of the category of environmental crimes in a separate Chapter of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation [10] (hereinafter – CC RF). In Chapter 26 of the criminal code of Russian Federation "Environmental crimes" provision of a socially dangerous act specified category, which is defined in art. 246-262 of the criminal code (18 articles), which defines deliberate or careless socially dangerous acts that infringe on the established in Russia, environmental attitude, environmental safety of society and the state, harming or threatening him causing to the environment, human and other pravoohraniteli interests [11, p. 250].

V. D. Ermakov notes that the violation of environmental criminal law is one of the most socially dangerous and common types of wrongful acts [12].

In combination with other environmental violations by severity of negative consequences in the field of demography, ecology and society they are currently a real threat to national security. In this regard, there is a need for the adoption at the Federal, regional and municipal levels of consistent and effective measures for the prevention, combating and reduction of environmental crime in Russia.

As is well known criminological characteristics of certain types of crime, including environmental crime, includes the following elements:

1) the status, dynamics, proportion, structure, level of latency, etc. [13, p. 63];

2) the causes and conditions conducive to the Commission of crimes;

3) criminological characteristics of offender;

4) prevention and prevention of crimes ... [14, p. 17].

These elements of criminological characteristics of ecological crime will be the subject of this study.

In Russia, according to official statistics for the year 2016 was 2160,1 thousand crimes, of which 23.7 thousand environmental crimes, the share of these crimes was 1.1 %, [15]. For 2010 there was 2628,8 thousand crimes, including 39,2 thousand environmental crimes, the proportion is 1.5 %) [16]. From these data it follows that in 2016 in comparison with 2010 was 15.5 thousand less environmental crimes, indicating that the dynamics of the reduction not only of all the recorded crimes and environmental crimes.

It is widely recognized that corruption crimes are characterized by a high latency [17, p. 1809]. This is sufficiently applies to environmental crimes, and therefore in the official statistics does not reflect all crimes committed by this category.

The author in previously published material, wrote that environmental crimes in Russia are characterized by a criminological indicator such as the timeliness of registration environmental offences and crimes, and thus draws attention to the fairly high percentage of the latency of environmental crimes, which according to expert estimates can not be less than 3-5 % [11, p. 250].

It is also worth noting a special danger of ecological crimes, as they carry long-term consequences for the natural environment, and, consequently, affect human health, reduced life expectancy of the population, harmful genetic changes.

Speaking about the reasons of crimes in the sphere of the environment, is a major factor of environmental crime, which will help to characterize this type of crime. First of all, the gaps in public environmental consciousness, which is expressed in the indifferent and even negligent attitude of the population towards the state of nature and the consumer attitude towards it. This attitude increases the crime situation in the sphere of environmental crimes and their relatively high latency.

Thus, according to A. I. Debt, the reasons of the damage of the environment most often are: 1) inadequate legislation, methods of use, storage, transport of biological, chemical, radioactive substances and decomposition products which contaminate the atmosphere, soil and water; 2) the discharge of toxic substances to the natural environment; 3) violation of the production technology of any works; 4) unauthorized by law fishing, hunting and felling of trees; 5) carelessness or negligence in the handling of fire, in consequence, caused a forest fire; 6) inadequate legislation, use of lands, which has led them to exhaustion and erosion of fertile soils; 7) functioning of the enterprises and vehicles with faulty treatment devices; 8) improper performance of regulatory functions by the management of the enterprises, and state and departmental inspectorates and other regulatory authorities [18].

Another reason can be considered as deficiencies in the activities of the bodies responsible for the fight against crime [19, p. 231], both in General and with environmental violations and crimes.

In addition to these reasons and conditions of relevant types of crime environmental crime applies "the scientific approach of causality in which a causes of crime is understood as the interaction of the environment and man, highlighting the internal and external causes and conditions of crime ..." [20, p. 5], which require additional independent research.

Criminological characteristics of perpetrators of environmental crimes and especially of those related to violation of rules of protection of the environment when carrying out various industrial activities, protection of water and atmospheric environment, fisheries, land use, subsoil use and handling of environmentally hazardous substances and wastes, mostly of the same type. Their uniformity is the similarity of the most important, from the standpoint of the science of criminology, the features and characteristics that enable one to identify similarities in the characteristics of criminal behaviour, offenders, circumstances, motives, and mechanisms for the implementation of environmental crimes, typological peculiarities of the personality of offenders, the nature and severity of the damage to the environment.

S. A. Ruzmetov in the criminological characteristics of the perpetrators of environmental crime proposes to consider the following typical elements of criminogenic situations that determine criminal behavior: 1) the tendency of a person to violations of environmental regulations (the regulations change, MIS-reporting etc); 2) as natural factors (adverse effects of temperature, humidity, radiation); 3) adverse working conditions, inadequacy of the instruments of production, etc.; 4) lack of training of certain categories of persons for activities in these natural conditions (inadequate qualification, inability to make decisions in difficult conditions); 5) the weakening of social control (inadequate assessment of the importance of environmental measures, etc.); 6) improper management of economic activities (lack of control, mismanagement, etc.) [21, p. 42-43].

V. I. Tarika proposes the following classification of the individual ecological criminal:

1) citizens as individuals who commit environmental crimes intentionally or recklessly, including in the group;

2) persons performing managerial functions in commercial or other organizations, as well as in non-profit organizations non-state bodies, local self-government bodies, state or municipal authorities, permanently, temporarily or on special authority performing organizational and administrative duties or administrative functions;

3) persons occupying state posts of the Russian Federation, of constituent entities of the Russian Federation, civil servants and employees of local governments and officials constantly, temporarily or on special authority exercising the functions of a representative of authority or performing organizational-administrative, administrative functions in state bodies, local government, state and municipal institutions, as well as in the Armed Forces, other troops and military formations of the Russian Federation (official) [22].

For criminological characteristics of perpetrators of environmental crimes, played by such characteristics as social status, age, gender, level of education and other psychological, social and ethical performance. Because environmental crime does not have any affiliation to a particular social class in Russia, and are often perpetrated in equal measure by all segments of the population, personal characteristics of offenders can be quite varied. Nevertheless, as belonging to a particular social position of the offender scientists distinguish three groups, the first of which consists of individuals who have committed an environmental crime on their own, but more often in groups. the second group included individuals being heads of organizations and enterprises, mainly in the transport, industrial and agricultural sector. The third group includes officials of state and municipal authorities, in whose area of responsibility is to organize the various processes in the environmental sphere.

For circumstances, of committing environmental crimes are most often characterized by agricultural, industrial, construction or production of a closed technological cycle with the presence of chemical and biological hazardous substances, with low technical equipment, lack of professional managerial level of organization of these works, in particular in the sphere of functioning of special treatment facilities not strong organizational discipline in the absence of the necessary demands of production managers and following all environmental requirements for technological and operational processes. The disclosure of the specific features of the situation provides the ability to quickly determine at what points you should pay attention during familiarization with the production processes, in which the contamination occurred, when the inspection of the contamination and special facilities designed for purification, study of technical equipment and documentation. Also allows you to answer the question of what officers and what facts should be questioning as witnesses, and which records should be deleted in order to more detailed study and soD. Understanding of the characteristics of the circumstances and the situation allows you to quickly determine the source of pollution and the responsible officials.

Motives for environmental crime is a nihilistic attitude to environmental requirements, the vested interests, but most often the unwillingness to burden themselves with the complexities and cost in order to ensure environmental safety of production and implementation of relevant works. Characteristics of offenders based on their similar motifs and typical subjects of crimes in criminal cases on violation of labour safety rules.

Criminological characteristics of ecological crime includes an element of prevention of crimes of this category.

On the basis of paragraph "d" of article 72 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, joint jurisdiction is determined by "nature management; environmental protection and ensuring environmental safety" [9] possible adoption of the Environmental code, both at the Federal and at the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation, which will contribute to the decision of the legislative gaps and conflicts in the sphere of environmental protection and ecological safety, and will also allow for state control over observance of environmental norms, including mining, which in many cases are produced of potentially environmentally hazardous ways.

The right to prevention of environmental crimes also include:

1) measures of socio-economic nature that are associated with the improvement of industrial production (in oil and gas, mining, steel and other industries) intense impact on the environment, improvement of agricultural production, development of the optimal technologies aimed at the economical relation to the earth, species of farm animals, preservation of wildlife habitat, etc. the intensive development and exploitation of modern transport on the basis of resource saving, reducing harmful impact on the atmosphere, soil, water, and other biological and physical parameters, etc;

2) measures of political and legal nature aimed at implementation of legal environmental policy, environmental security, further improvement of normative-legal regulation at the Federal and regional levels in terms of environmental protection;

3) measures moral-cultural and psychological nature, related to the constant improvement of the ecological and legal consciousness (thinking) as at the public level and at the individual level not only state and municipal employees and the entire population of Russia, and, accordingly, overcoming of inertia, departmental divisions, stereotypes and beliefs demagogy, incompetence, focus on the wrong decisions, lack of control, protectionism, careerist aspirations, sovereignty, etc [23].

We should pay particular attention to the improvement of environmental-legal education, which can lead to:

1) to ensure internal and external consent of the citizens of Russia to legal restrictions;

2) active promotion and information security restrictions, setting administrative, civil and criminal responsibility for ecological offenses and crimes;

3) the formation of citizenship on ecological safety and environmental protection, increase of social activity of citizens, their intolerance and combating environmental offences and crimes, etc.

To special measures for the prevention of environmental crimes include:

1) an effective system of prosecutorial supervision over the enforcement of environmental legislation,

2) permanent and effective system of departmental control of environmental authorities for the relevant areas and areas in economic activities;

3) efficient operation of the permit system in part of the rules, issuance of weapons, explosives, etc.;

4) establishment of the special regime and reorganisation of technology and management functions and processes;

5) the normative prohibition of the implementation of certain environmentally harmful actions, etc. [23].

According to the author, the prevention of environmental crime require a more detailed and independent research in order to develop a consistent and more effective measures for the protection of the environment, which will allow you to use the most optimal methods and forms of prevention of environmental crime in Russia.

Thus, this study may be understood as an analysis of the existing norms of the Constitution and the criminal code of the Russian Federation, official statistics of the theoretical principles and scientific approaches, as well as the author's understanding of some issues of criminological characteristics of ecological crime.

 

References:

1. Zhadan V. N. The question of the development of legislation on environmental crimes // the Young scientist. – 2013. – N 5. – P. 515-519.

2.  Zhadan V. N. On the Criminogenic Situation in Russia and Its Significance to the Security of Citizens // World Applied Sciences Journal. – 2013. – N 25 (4). – P. 664-668.

3. Zhadan V. N. Current issues of criminological characteristics of ecological crime // Young scientist. – 2013. – N 4. – P. 387-393.

4. Bakunin O. S. On some problems of the fight against environmental offenses // State and law. – 1997. – N 1. – P. 18-22.

5. Zhevlakov E. N. Environmental crimes: criminal law and criminological aspects. – M.: Publishing house urao, 2002. – 239 p.

6. Ledneva E. G. Environmental crime in the Russian Federation: concept, causes, conditions and prevention: abstract. dis. kand. the faculty of law. Sciences. – M., 2007. – 260 p.

7. Savchenko, I. A. the identity of the offender as one of elements of criminalistic characteristics of the environmental crimes // Siberian law Bulletin. – 2005. – N 4. – P. 76-78.

8.  The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by popular vote 12.12.1993) (as amended, amended Laws of the Russian Federation on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation from 30.12.2008 N 6-FKZ, from 30.12.2008 N 7-FKZ, from 05.02.2014 N 2-FKZ, from 21.07.2014 N 11-FCL) // Sz the Russian Federation. – 2014. – N 31. – St. 4398.

9.  Criminal code of the Russian Federation from 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (as amended on 29.07.2017 N 250-FZ) // Sz the Russian Federation. – 1996. – N 25. – St. 2954.

10.  Zhadan V. N., Lebedev A. A. criminal-legal analysis of environmental crime in Russia // Issues of Russian and international law. – 2017. – T. 7. – N 2B. – P. 247-260.

11.  Ermakov V. D., Sukharev A. Ya. Environmental law of Russia: Textbook // Ermakov V. D., Sukharev A. Ya. – M.: Publishing center "IMPA". – 1997. – 480 p.

12.  Zhadan V. N. The question of the prevention of corruption crime in Russia // News of Science and Education. – 2017. – Vol. 1. – N 2. – P. 61-67.

13. Corruption: the main trends of resistance. The collective monograph; [edited by L. A. Andreeva]. – Novosibirsk: Izd. "Sibak", 2015. – 196 p.

14. Zhadan V. N. Problems of criminological characteristics of criminality of minors in Russia // the Baltic journal of Humanities. – 2017. – T. 6. – N 1 (18). – P. 179-182.

15. A criminality condition in Russia for January-December 2016. URL: https://ģāä.šō/folder/101762/item/9338947/

16. Information about the state of crime in Russia in 2010. URL: http://www.globalitv.ru/show/2542

17. Gumerov T. A., Zhadan V. N., I. G. Mukhametgaliyev On Criminological Aspects of Corruption-Related Criminal Activity in Russia // The Social Sciences. – 2015. – T. 10. – N 7. – P. 1807-1811.

18. Dolgov A. I. Criminology: Textbook for universities. – Moscow: Publishing house "Norma". – 2005. – 912 p.

19. Zhadan V. N. The reasons and conditions of Commission of crimes minors and youth in Russia // Humanitarian, socio-economic and social Sciences. – 2014. – N 4. – P. 227-232.

20. Zhadan V. N., Gataullin Z. S., Muchamedgaliev I. G., A. Z. Ibatova, Rasskazov D. F. General social and personal-microenviron mental determinants of crimes committed by minors in Russian modern society // Man In India. – 2017. – N 97 (2). – P. 1-9.

21. Ruzmetov, S. A. Actual problems of use of special knowledge in the investigation of environmental crimes. – Kaliningrad, 2005. – 219 p.

22. Tarico V. I. analysis of the individual ecological criminal // Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanities and social Sciences. – 2017. – P. 108-114. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/analiz-lichnosti-ekologicheskogo-prestupnika

23. Prevention ekologicheskih crime URL: http://helpiks.org/9-13090.html