SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF STUDENTS: BASIC DATA BASED

ON AXIOLOGICAL  APPROACH

 
Li A.A., master student of specialty "Social pedagogy and self-cognition", 
al-Farabi Kazakh National University
 
Scientific adviser - Anarbek.N.A. candidate of pedagogical Sciences, associate Professor,

Department of pedagogic and educational management, faculty of Philosophy and political science at the al-Farabi Kazakh National University

 

"Together, we must strengthen the culture of the country in social solidarity, the system of moral values  of developed society"

President of Republic of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev

 

Given the current trends in the Republic of Kazakhstan one of the priority objectives of the State Program for Education Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2011 - 2020 years, is "the formation of the youth active citizenship, social responsibility, patriotism, high moral and leadership qualities." [1]

            Solution of this problem urgently requires a high educational and cultural level of young people and the presence of positive social behavior patterns - a kind of examples which usually cultivate the state.

            The Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan emphasized that Kazakhstan - a socially responsible state. The worldwide trend of strengthening the role of the state in solving social problems highlighted in the World Bank report, 1997 "The state's role in a changing world". [2]

            The need for the existence of social responsibility is stated in the European Union, which has its social legislation at the supranational and national levels.

            Formation of social responsibility of the student is a complex, multi-layered process, the implementation of which we believe is possible by a specially designed course on the basis of universal values, providing a transition from the existing hierarchy in his presence-level manifestation of social responsibility to the potential opportunities, even higher.

            The problem of social responsibility is one of the most complex, also affecting the interests of different social groups. The great diversity of points of view on this issue.

            I.V. Grigorieva defines social responsibility as difficult, a collective moral and legal, ethical and philosophical - psychological category, studied many sciences, but from different angles. [3]

            Social responsibility is a system, which is a prerequisite for interaction between the individual and society; characterized by

• dynamism of its structural elements: the subject - object - a court; manifested in the interaction of the individual (individual) and society (society) as:

• human trait, but not innate, given the nature of birth, and as a result of exposure to certain social conditions to a specific person;

• socio-cultural quality of the person, which is directly related to a strong-willed individual dedication, manifested in the implementation of their activities socially active within a particular society;

• mechanism of social regulation of social and public relations of the individual and society, a sign of social organization. [4]

We have highlighted the structure of social responsibility Pazin O.E

 

Basing on classification  of Sorokin S.L., we highlighted the following basic characteristics of social responsibility:

• valuable attitude to another person (spiritual, socially selective, need-utilitarian) as a sign of manifestation of value-semantic sphere of the person, which is expressed in the ratio of modalities "responsible before" and "responsibility";

• personal choice - a sign that is expressed in the sense of identity of their independence, their right to choose their responsibility for decision-making;

• additional features such  as a social self - spirituality, creativity, social reflection and self-regulation.

At the heart of any society is a certain system of social norms and human values, learning, which determines the level of social responsibility of the individual.

Increased social responsibility is the main task of the administrative and managerial staff, faculty, student body, i.e., It comes to the fore the quality of human capital.

An analysis of the scientific literature shows that the system of value orientations, as a psychological characteristic of a mature personality, one of the central structures of personality, expresses a meaningful relationship of man to the social reality and as such determines the motivation of his behavior, has a significant impact on all aspects of its activities. As an element of the structure of the individual value orientations characterize the internal readiness of the person to commit certain activities to meet the needs and interests indicate the orientation of its behavior.

Values - this is the core of the personality structure that defines its orientation, the highest level of regulation of social behavior.

We focus on the T.I. Petrakova’s classification of values, which involves the division of property into three types: natural, purchased and absolute.

·        Natural values ​​- a value of natural forces and faculties of the soul, i.e. mind, feelings, will. Natural values ​​are clarity of mind, quick thinking, memory reliability, sincerity of feelings, firmness of will.

·        Acquired values ​​- these are the values ​​learned in the course of human intellectual and moral development, such as: correctness, politeness, respect and sympathy for the man, compassion, gratitude, generosity, patience, and others.

·        The absolute universal values ​​- these are values ​​that do not change over time and are not significant for some limited number of people (social group, class, party, state or coalition of states), and something of value to all mankind. [5]

As a result, it can be concluded that the formation of the social responsibility of the student is the result of detection of the absolute human values.

 

List of references:

1. Order of the president of the republic of kazakhstan On approval of the State Program for Education Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2011-2020

2. Maydyrova A.B. PhD, associate professor. Head Chair of "Management and Human Resource Management" of the Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan "Social responsibility of business in Kazakhstan"

3. Grigorieva I.V. Theory of State and Law: Textbook / I.V. Grigorieva. - Tambov Univ Thumb. state. tehn. she ounce, 2009. - 304 p.

4. Pazin O.E.  "The social responsibility of the individual in modern society"  thesis, Nizhny Novgorod, 2007 165 p.

5. Sidorkina S.L.  "Formation of social responsibility among teenagers through social activities", Nizhny Novgorod - 2010.

6. Petrakov T.I. Spiritual bases of moral education. M., 1997.

 

Annotation

In this article we will examine various definitions of social responsibility, human values, the structure and the basic characteristics of the social responsibility of students are highlighted.

Key words: social responsibility, human values.