Geography
and geology / 6.Natural management and environmental monitoring
Bocharov V.L., Strogonova L.N.
Voronezh State University
Environmental hazards:
philosophical and psychological aspects
Environmental risk, probability, chance,
uncertainty - these concepts have become part of the daily life of human
society. Environmental issues of modern time are not only based on a risk
assessment, but also with the philosophical, psychological, economic, social
and other factors. The risk is always associated with the decision and
willingness to accept it from the form and dynamics of uncertainty.
Risk, probability, uncertainty are constant and
unavoidable partner in life and work of modern man. The risk touches everybody;
modern society is a society of risk, as uncertainty and the risk of emergencies
and potential threats are increasing [1,5]. The concept of "risk" is
used in almost all natural, technical, humanitarian and social sciences.
Scientists speak about the environmental, geological, psychological, economic,
social, legal, health and many other risks [3,6]. In particular, environmental
risk is based on the principles of sustainability techno-natural ecosystems, using
basic natural (geology, geography, hydrology, geoecology), mathematics (probability
theory, mathematical statistics, computer science) sciences. Therefore, there
are still different interpretations of the concept of "risk",
although a priori assumed that the risk has some general, universal properties
[2,4]. As one of the most common definitions of risk - is the level of
uncertainty in anticipation of the outcome. The decisions taken at risk are
those, whose results are not obvious, certain, however, the likelihood of which
can be evaluated. In other words, risk - is measurable uncertainty. Typically
risk situation involves two interrelated attributes: the first reflects a
certain degree of uncertainty, the second - the ability to make decisions under
conditions of uncertainty.
Thus, the risk as the probability of losses
associated with environmental degradation as a result of the transformation of
the environment of human activity. Of the many definitions used to determine
the environmental risk can be considered, for example, even such as the level
of uncertainty in the prediction of environmental damage resulting from the
economic activity, possible probability of losses arising from the specificity
of certain phenomena of natural or man-made disasters, the probability of
undesirable result of the transformation of ecosystems, the possibility of occurrence
of environmental events under the influence of various factors, activated by
human activities, measurable uncertainty effects of anthropogenic and natural
ecosystems, the ratio of information and entropy on the factors that can affect
the environment and people, the risk of the subject due to the uncertainty of
financial effects of interventions on environmental safety of the environment.
One of the most common ways that take into
account the probabilities of the events and the associated negative
environmental impacts is to obtain the probability of the product on its
results, expressed in quantitative characteristics. In probability theory and
mathematical statistics, this product is called the expected value of a random
event (a random variable).
As a rule, the definition of environmental risk
assessment mainly includes the likelihood of the potential environmental
events. Can be considered in this case, three situations:
- The probability of an adverse event in the
ecological sense is very high, but the alleged damages associated with this
event are missing, so we can assume that the risk is zero;
- The possible effects of environmental adverse
events are very significant, but the probability of its occurrence is very low,
and therefore the risk is zero;
- Damage from possible adverse developments in
the ecological sense is very significant and the probability of its occurrence
is large, in this case the risk is also very high [5]. It is quite obvious that
the assessment of risk depends not only on the probability of the event, but
also on the quantitative parameters.
Quantitative assessment of environmental risk
is constantly used in various projects. Sustainability of modern techno-natural
ecosystems is largely determined by natural conditions, transformed to varying
degrees by human activities. It is logical to assume that the analysis and
evaluation of environmental risks appropriately guided by the potential loss. It
is a psychological phenomenon: the man making the decision, not just avoids the
uncertainty, but do not want to loss.
It is impossible to disagree with the authors
[1,5] that the risk, as a philosophical category is associated both with the
subject and with a solution that takes this subject, so, without making a
decision does not arise and risky situation. In turn, without forecasting and
risk assessment can not make a decision. Thus, the assessment of risk in this
case serves as an integral index, including a probabilistic assessment of how
the implementation of the solution and the quantitative characteristics of the
consequences of the decision. In ecology, a risky situation - a kind of
uncertain situation, including an assessment of the probability of considering
the influence of the environment. Consequently, the situation of the risk
consists of two logically interacting components: the objective (probabilistic,
uncertain) and subjective (behavioral). Subject not only to decide, but it also
assesses the probability of occurrence of adverse events and the associated
risk of loss. The process and result of target selection and how to achieve it –
is always social and psychological phenomenon [1]. The solution can be called
as a link between cognition and in some behaviors, human action.
Decision-making is a thought process, involving a preliminary sense of purpose
and mode of action, study the various options. The most important feature of
this process is its mental attitude and strong will.
In taking decisions human knowledge, interests
and outlook are integrated. Purposeful human activity is always associated with
decision-making and this is a structural element, the most important attribute
of this activity [5]. Any human activity can be represented as a chain of
decision-making.
In practice, the main purpose of all the action
at risk is based replacement for rigorous analytical uncertainties laws. In accordance
with this approach, it is concluded if there is a threat to the established
environmental situation and whether immediate implementation of measures to
reduce or avoid the risk.
In conclusion, it should be emphasized that the
risks including environmental is an integral characteristic combining marks of the
probabilities of decision realization and its consequences. Every subject has
its own system of preferences, so there is no universal index for integrating
probability and loss. However, the task of the subject - to choose a solution
that minimized the risk of implementation. Risk should not be seen simply as a
clash with circumstances beyond our control, but as a conscious choice, so the
subject must have a rational basis for making wise decisions in conditions of
uncertainty. Then he can afford to compare different options and choose the one
that most closely matches its objectives, estimates and system of values.
Literature
1. Aryamov A.A. The general theory of risk:
legal, economic, and psychological analysis. - Moscow: RAP Wolters Klouver,
2010. – 208 p.
2. Bashkin V.N. Environmental risks: the
calculation, management and insurance. - M.: High School, 2007. - 360 p.
3. Bezuglova E.V., Matsiy S.I., Pleshakov D.V.
Geological risk management and psychological aspects // Georisk. - 2011. - ¹ 4.
- p. 44 - 48.
4. Bocharov V.L. Philosophical aspects of
environmental risk // Ecology: synthesis of science, technical and humanities. –
Saratov: Saratov tech. un-ty, 2012. - p.132-136.
5. Diev V.S. Philosophical paradigm of risk //
ECO. - 2008. - ¹ 12. - p. 27 - 38.
6. Kozlovsky S.V., Sheshenya N.L. Prediction of
geological hazards and risks of their display as part of the space-time system
// High school news. Geology and exploration. - 2010. - ¹ 6. - p. 59 - 61.