Ïîëèòîëîãèÿ
/ 6. Ïðîáëåìû
âçàèìîäåéñòâèÿ
âëàñòè
è
îáùåñòâåííîñòè (îòå÷åñòâåííûé
è
çàðóáåæíûé
îïûò)
Shadei N.V.
National University
“Yaroslav the Wise Law Academy of Ukraine”
The Problem of Human Rights
Violation by Police
Human rights are
the basic rights of every individual against the state or any other public
authority as a member of the human family irrespective of any other
consideration. Thus every individual of the society has the inherent right to
be treated with dignity in all situations.
These basic human
rights are fixed in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which came into
existence shortly after the Second World War, reflecting the wishes of people
never see such a horror again. The Declaration represents the first global
expression of rights to which all human beings are inherently entitled. It
consists of 30 articles which have been elaborated in subsequent international
treaties, regional human rights instruments, national constitutions and laws.
Nowadays more than hundred countries have signed the Declaration.
One of the most important government agency established to ensure the
human rights is the police. There is a prevailing opinion that the police protect
the population and the population helps the police to prevent and solve crimes.
But the real situation is far from dreams. Almost every day we can hear the
information about the human rights violation by police. Most people have heard
the argument that the respect for human rights is somehow opposed to the
effective law enforcement. And the effective law enforcement means to capture
and punish the criminal. Thus to secure his conviction, it is necessary to
“bend the rules” a little. A tendency to use overwhelming force in controlling
demonstrations, physical pressure to extract information from detainees, or
excessive force to secure an arrest can be observed now and then. In this way
of thinking, law enforcement is a war against crime, and human rights are
merely obstacles thrown in the path of the police by lawyers and NGOs (non-governmental
organizations).
In fact, violations of human rights by police only make the already
challenging task of law enforcement more difficult. When the law enforcer
becomes the lawbreaker, the result is an assault on human dignity, on the law
itself and on all institutions of public authority. The effects of police human
rights violations are multi-fold:
· They erode public
confidence
· They hamper
effective prosecutions in court
· They isolate the
police from the community
· They result in the
guilty avoiding sentence, and the innocent being punished
· They force police
agencies to be reactive, rather than preventive in their approach to crime
· They bring agents
and institutions of public authority into disrepute
· They exacerbate
civil unrest
In
Brazil in 2007, according to official figures, police killed at least 1,260
individuals—the highest total to date. All incidents were officially labeled
“acts of resistance” and received little or no investigation.
Police commits rights violations for different reasons. Rulers may believe that
such violations are necessary in order to maintain power, undermine
or destroy the delinquency. They may think that some types of violations are
necessary evils when faced with certain risks. For example, torture or indefinite
detention can appear to be a reasonable price to pay in order to reduce the
risk of terrorism. States can also violate human rights unintentionally:
lawmakers can draft a legal system that unnecessarily encroaches on private
freedom (e.g. the “nanny state“).One more possible reason why the rigts are
violated is corruption. Corruption is a systemic problem and negatively affects
the country's economy and governance. Corruption not only undermines democratic
institutions, but also destroys – directly and brutally – the mechanisms
designed to ensure respect for human rights and the government’s accountability
for human rights violations, thus making people vulnerable to the arbitrariness
of bureaucrats and law enforcement bodies and to the lack of justice in the
judicial system.
When violations do occur, it is important to have the right
institutional safeguards in place to ensure that they remain isolated and that
police management quickly corrects deficiencies. Independent oversight bodies
that are objective, transparent and effective are the first order priority in
every successful police reform strategy. Accountability mechanisms, both
external (public complaints procedures) and internal (disciplinary procedures)
help insure police discipline and the adherence to human rights.
Creating effective disciplinary systems within the police should be a
first-order priority. Effective,
transparent and fair accountability mechanisms, both internal and external,
will help insure police discipline and secure public trust. This is one of the
most important aspects of improving police respect for human rights. A major
problem in many countries has been police impunity where the police literally
got away with murder, torture, rape and extortion. The public needs to know and
have confidence in the complaint procedure; if a police officer did something
wrong a citizen can file a complaint and be sure that it will be acted on and
not dumped in a drawer never to be seen again. The police should conduct a
public information campaign describing the process of how citizens can file a
complaint for police misconduct.
Bibliography
1. Donnelly, Jack. Universal human rights in theory
and practice (2nd ed.)./ Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.
2. Forsythe, David P. Human Rights in International
Relations. / Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.