Ñåëüñêîå õîçÿéñòâî/3. Çåìëåäåëèå, ãðóíòîâåäåíèå è
àãðîõèìèÿ
Candidate of
Agricultural Sciences Shilov M.P., 4rd year student of ABF
Lyubimova E.V.
RSE «Kostanay State University named by A.Baytursinov», Kazakhstan
The
effectiveness of nitric fertilizers having NO-TILL technology in droughty
temperate steppes of Northern Kazakhstan
Introducing
saving-resource technologies of agricultural crops cultivating based on zero
tilling is a modern direction at the steppe farming. At the same time it brings
to have the ability to low nitric-mineralized of black soil and generates a
need to put nitric fertilizers into the fallow corn of crop
rotation. In this regard the sample black soil of Kostanay region was examined
to identify the effectiveness of different doses of nitric fertilizers for
wheat after the second pair in the rotation fallow - spring wheat-wheat-wheat.
The
experiment is used the chemical fallow with herbicide gliphosate. It is
eliminated all the mechanical processing of wheat in crop rotation. Chaff was milled and spread over the surface the soil on
fields everywhere. Nitric and phosphorus fertilizers were put into aisles with
the sowing complex. Such fertilizers were used as the amount nitrate (at the
rate of 34 %) simple granular superphosphate (at the rate of 19,5 %). The
nitrate nitrogen was determinate by the ionometric method in a soil and mobile
phosphorus on Machigin. Experimental design presented in table 1.
The researches of
nitric conditions showed that the provision the check variant was low with a
nitric which had a content on the basis of 6,3 mg/kg equal 0-40 in a layer
before sowing wheat the second time (table 1). This figure usually amounts
12-15mg/kg during normal processing zone and rates as medium and high. Obviously,
such reduction happens due to sharp suppression of nitrification process on
zero tilling.
Table 1
The dynamic of being nitrate nitrogen and agility phosphorus in the soil
on wheat growth stage, on the basis of mg/kg (average for 2011-2012)
|
Variant |
Development phase |
Average per the season |
||
|
Sowing |
Outlet to the tube |
Harvesting |
||
|
1. Chaff 2,0 t
(control) |
6,3/13,4 |
3,4/13,1 |
3,2/13,2 |
4,3/13,2 |
|
2. Chaff 2,0 t + P20 |
6,4/15,2 |
3,7/13,8 |
3,0/13,5 |
4,2/14,2 |
|
3. Chaff 2,0 t + N30 |
8,8/13,7 |
8,5/14,6 |
5,2/14,0 |
7,5/14,1 |
|
4. Chaff 2,0 t +N30 P20 |
9,7/15,0 |
9,2/15,9 |
4,8/14,8 |
8,0/15,2 |
|
5. Chaff 2,0 t +N45 P20 |
10,8/15,4 |
11,2/16,2 |
5,6/15,3 |
9,2/15,6 |
*numerator - N-NO3 in the
0-40 sm soil layer, denominator – P2O5 in the 0-20 sm
layer.
Using of
superphosphate P20 recommended dose had no effect at the nitrogen
content to sowing the amount was at the control level on the basis of 6,4 mg/kg.
The situation has changed when nitrogen fertilizer is applied at a dose of N30.
The nitrogen content in the soil is increased from 34 to 44% and reaches the
value of 8.8 mg/kg. But it does not change the
gradation of security, it remains low, but it can significantly make effect on
a growth as a whole and on the development of plant, especially in the initial
phase of growth with poor root system developing. Putting P20 intensifies
the process of production of nitrates by 10 percent; it gives the opportunity
to bring the number up to 9,7 mg/kg. However, only nitrogen dose changes the limits
of supply on the basis of 45 kg a.s. and the limit increases its content to
10.8 mg/kg with soil transformation into average gradation.
The content of
nitrogen falls steeply to 3,4 and 3,7 mg/kg with the bringing of some form of
phosphate fertilizers (P20) in the phase of the tube exit under control.
It is impossible clarify only such a reduction near from 54 to 60 % using wheat
plant. Obviously, most of the soil nitrogen is absorbed by microorganisms in
the decay straw. This decline does not occur when applying nitrogen
fertilizers. So at a dose of N30, both separately and in combination P20, there was no significant reduction of nitrate nitrogen – 8,5-9, 2
mg/kg. Further increase of the dose (N 45) even increases the amount - 11.2 mg/kg. Obviously, an additional
application of nitrogen in the soil is not only a source for the
microorganisms, but also enhances the process for nitrification. All this
eventually increases nitrogen nutrition wheat and further reduces its yield.
The availability of nitrogen phase
of booting to harvest virtually unchanged and remained very low is from 3,2
to 3,0 mg/kg
before harvesting wheat on the
options with the introduction of straw,
both separately and phosphate
fertilizers. The amount during nitrogen fertilizer
embedding was slightly higher. It’s from 4,8 to 5,6 mg/kg,
which can positively affect the grain
filling.
The dynamics
of phosphorus regime in the experiment was much
less pronounced. It’s substantially the same 13,4 and 13,2 mg/kg
on the control version of mobile phosphorus content before sowing and harvesting
period, which is characterized by low degree of security of this element.
Superphosphate (P20) adding
changes the low level of provision
on average one, with is 15,2
mg/kg. However, these changes occur only
at the time of application them, though its amount decreases to a low level again is
13,8 mg/kg and
remains unchanged for harvest
is 13,5 mg/kg in the phase of booting. Although there is no significantly alter the phosphorus mode with implementation of
nitrogen fertilizer, but it brings in some features of the dynamics. Therefore, the dose amount of
available phosphorus N30 embodiment corresponds to the control is 13,7 mg/kg before
sowing. However, the content of wheat is increased by 7 % and 14,6 mg/kg in the phase of booting. Apparently, nitrogen fertilizers increase soil microbial
activity, which leads to additional release of phosphorus from the
hard-to-reach connections. This process passes
when a joint application of
nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers is most active. This contributes to the fact that
on the options N30P20 and N45P20 security and
phosphorus was at
the average level throughout the growing season of wheat in the end.
Marked features impacted on the productivity of wheat in the conditions
of mineral nutrition (table 2). So, the least yield was got on control variant and was amounted 14,1
c/ha, that explained as low ensure of nitrogenous and phosphorus to all growth
stage of cultivation.
Table
2
Making the effect
of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on
the yield of spring wheat, ñ/ha (average for 2011 - 2012).
|
Variant |
Yields, ñ/ha |
increase grain |
Payback 1 kg active substance (a.s.) by grain, kg |
|
|
ñ/ha |
% |
|||
|
1. Chaff 2.0 tones (control) |
14,1 |
- |
- |
- |
|
2. Chaff 2.0
tones + Ð20 |
15,1 |
1,0 |
7 |
5,0 |
|
3. Chaff 2.0
tones +N30 |
15,9 |
1,8 |
12 |
6,0 |
|
4. Chaff 2.0 tones +N30P20 |
18,4 |
4,3 |
30 |
8,6 |
|
5. Chaff 2.0 tones +N45P20 |
19,3 |
4,8 |
36 |
7,3 |
|
LSD05 |
0,9 |
- |
- |
- |
Although
the separate introduction of the P20 and N30 increased
yields, respectively by 1,0 c (7%) and 1,8 y (12%), but their action was ineffective.
Joint their using
increases the productivity of wheat
to 18.4 ñ/ha sharply, while the increase relative to the
control reaches 4,3 ñ/ha or 30%. Increasing doses of nitrogen in combination up to 45
kg a.s. had no big effect on productivity growth. Compared with the previous version of grain growth was
only 0,5 ñ/ha.
The choice of rational dose nitrogen-phosphorus fertilizers is
derived from analysis of recoupment by
1 kg a.s. of fertilizer grain wheat. This figure was the best option for N30P20,
where 1 kg of
batteries was paid off in 8,6 kg of
grain. Only 1 kg of fertilizer produced only 7,3 kg of grain by N45P20 on the
background despite continued growth yield. The separate putting of N30 and P20 had the
lowest rate of recoupment, respectively
it was only 5,0 and
6,0 kg.